Review of coreference resolution in English and Persian

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.04428v2
• Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 20:24:09 GMT
• Title: Review of coreference resolution in English and Persian
• Authors: Hassan Haji Mohammadi, Alireza Talebpour, Ahmad Mahmoudi Aznaveh, Samaneh Yazdani,
• Abstract summary: Coreference resolution (CR) identifies expressions referring to the same real-world entity. This paper explores the latest advancements in CR, spanning coreference and anaphora resolution. Recognizing the unique challenges of Persian CR, we dedicate a focused analysis to this under-resourced language.
• Score: 8.604145658574689
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Coreference resolution (CR), identifying expressions referring to the same real-world entity, is a fundamental challenge in natural language processing (NLP). This paper explores the latest advancements in CR, spanning coreference and anaphora resolution. We critically analyze the diverse corpora that have fueled CR research, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and suitability for various tasks. We examine the spectrum of evaluation metrics used to assess CR systems, emphasizing their advantages, disadvantages, and the need for more nuanced, task-specific metrics. Tracing the evolution of CR algorithms, we provide a detailed overview of methodologies, from rule-based approaches to cutting-edge deep learning architectures. We delve into mention-pair, entity-based, cluster-ranking, sequence-to-sequence, and graph neural network models, elucidating their theoretical foundations and performance on benchmark datasets. Recognizing the unique challenges of Persian CR, we dedicate a focused analysis to this under-resourced language. We examine existing Persian CR systems and highlight the emergence of end-to-end neural models leveraging pre-trained language models like ParsBERT. This review is an essential resource for researchers and practitioners, offering a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art in CR, identifying key challenges, and charting a course for future research in this rapidly evolving field.

Related papers

• A comprehensive survey of oracle character recognition: challenges, benchmarks, and beyond [39.542007188857376]
  Oracle character recognition has become a pivotal field intersecting archaeology, paleography, and historical cultural studies. Traditional methods of oracle character recognition have relied heavily on manual interpretation by experts. With recent breakthroughs in pattern recognition and deep learning, there is a growing movement towards the automation of oracle character recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T07:50:22Z)
• A Survey of Event Causality Identification: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Assessment [6.492836595169771]
  Event Causality Identification (ECI) has become a crucial task in Natural Language Processing (NLP) Our taxonomy classifies ECI methods according to the two primary tasks of sentence-level (SECI) and document-level (DECI) event causality identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T17:19:42Z)
• Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks [68.49251303172674]
  State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive problem-solving capabilities but may struggle with complex reasoning and factual correctness. Existing methods harness the strengths of chain-of-thought and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to decompose a complex problem into simpler steps and apply retrieval to improve factual correctness. We introduce Critic-guided planning with Retrieval-augmentation, CR-Planner, a novel framework that leverages fine-tuned critic models to guide both reasoning and retrieval processes through planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T11:26:02Z)
• Beyond Metrics: A Critical Analysis of the Variability in Large Language Model Evaluation Frameworks [3.773596042872403]
  Large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, the need for robust and standardized evaluation benchmarks becomes paramount. Various frameworks have emerged as noteworthy contributions to the field, offering comprehensive evaluation tests and benchmarks. This paper provides an exploration and critical analysis of some of these evaluation methodologies, shedding light on their strengths, limitations, and impact on advancing the state-of-the-art in natural language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T03:37:14Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges [57.88520765782177]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. We propose a coherent taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics, offering a structured framework to understand and compare these methods. By discussing unresolved challenges, including bias, robustness, domain-specificity, and unified evaluation, this paper seeks to offer insights to researchers and advocate for fairer and more advanced NLG evaluation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T15:59:09Z)
• OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Models [122.27878464009181]
  We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of Large Multimodal Models, such as GPT4V and Gemini, in various text-related visual tasks. OCRBench contains 29 datasets, making it the most comprehensive OCR evaluation benchmark available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-13T11:28:37Z)
• GLUECons: A Generic Benchmark for Learning Under Constraints [102.78051169725455]
  In this work, we create a benchmark that is a collection of nine tasks in the domains of natural language processing and computer vision. We model external knowledge as constraints, specify the sources of the constraints for each task, and implement various models that use these constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T16:45:36Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• An Interpretable and Uncertainty Aware Multi-Task Framework for Multi-Aspect Sentiment Analysis [15.755185152760083]
  Document-level Multi-aspect Sentiment Classification (DMSC) is a challenging and imminent problem. We propose a deliberate self-attention-based deep neural network model, namely FEDAR, for the DMSC problem. FEDAR can achieve competitive performance while also being able to interpret the predictions made.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T22:32:39Z)
• A Framework for Evaluation of Machine Reading Comprehension Gold Standards [7.6250852763032375]
  This paper proposes a unifying framework to investigate the present linguistic features, required reasoning and background knowledge and factual correctness. The absence of features that contribute towards lexical ambiguity, the varying factual correctness of the expected answers and the presence of lexical cues, all of which potentially lower the reading comprehension complexity and quality of the evaluation data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T11:30:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.