Simple initialization and parametrization of sinusoidal networks via their kernel bandwidth

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14503v1
• Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 07:41:48 GMT
• Title: Simple initialization and parametrization of sinusoidal networks via their kernel bandwidth
• Authors: Filipe de Avila Belbute-Peres, J. Zico Kolter
• Abstract summary: sinusoidal neural networks with activations have been proposed as an alternative to networks with traditional activation functions. We first propose a simplified version of such sinusoidal neural networks, which allows both for easier practical implementation and simpler theoretical analysis. We then analyze the behavior of these networks from the neural tangent kernel perspective and demonstrate that their kernel approximates a low-pass filter with an adjustable bandwidth.
• Score: 92.25666446274188
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Neural networks with sinusoidal activations have been proposed as an alternative to networks with traditional activation functions. Despite their promise, particularly for learning implicit models, their training behavior is not yet fully understood, leading to a number of empirical design choices that are not well justified. In this work, we first propose a simplified version of such sinusoidal neural networks, which allows both for easier practical implementation and simpler theoretical analysis. We then analyze the behavior of these networks from the neural tangent kernel perspective and demonstrate that their kernel approximates a low-pass filter with an adjustable bandwidth. Finally, we utilize these insights to inform the sinusoidal network initialization, optimizing their performance for each of a series of tasks, including learning implicit models and solving differential equations.

Related papers

• Training Hamiltonian neural networks without backpropagation [0.0]
  We present a backpropagation-free algorithm to accelerate the training of neural networks for approximating Hamiltonian systems. We show that our approach is more than 100 times faster with CPUs than the traditionally trained Hamiltonian Neural Networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T15:22:30Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Learning Equivariant Representations of Neural Networks [55.04145324152541]
  We propose to represent neural networks as computational graphs of parameters. Our approach enables a single model to encode neural computational graphs with diverse architectures. We showcase the effectiveness of our method on a wide range of tasks, including classification and editing of implicit neural representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T18:01:01Z)
• How neural networks learn to classify chaotic time series [77.34726150561087]
  We study the inner workings of neural networks trained to classify regular-versus-chaotic time series. We find that the relation between input periodicity and activation periodicity is key for the performance of LKCNN models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T08:53:27Z)
• Globally Optimal Training of Neural Networks with Threshold Activation Functions [63.03759813952481]
  We study weight decay regularized training problems of deep neural networks with threshold activations. We derive a simplified convex optimization formulation when the dataset can be shattered at a certain layer of the network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T18:59:13Z)
• Lifted Bregman Training of Neural Networks [28.03724379169264]
  We introduce a novel mathematical formulation for the training of feed-forward neural networks with (potentially non-smooth) proximal maps as activation functions. This formulation is based on Bregman and a key advantage is that its partial derivatives with respect to the network's parameters do not require the computation of derivatives of the network's activation functions. We present several numerical results that demonstrate that these training approaches can be equally well or even better suited for the training of neural network-based classifiers and (denoising) autoencoders with sparse coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T11:12:52Z)
• Robust Training and Verification of Implicit Neural Networks: A Non-Euclidean Contractive Approach [64.23331120621118]
  This paper proposes a theoretical and computational framework for training and robustness verification of implicit neural networks. We introduce a related embedded network and show that the embedded network can be used to provide an $ell_infty$-norm box over-approximation of the reachable sets of the original network. We apply our algorithms to train implicit neural networks on the MNIST dataset and compare the robustness of our models with the models trained via existing approaches in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-08T03:13:24Z)
• Imbedding Deep Neural Networks [0.0]
  Continuous depth neural networks, such as Neural ODEs, have refashioned the understanding of residual neural networks in terms of non-linear vector-valued optimal control problems. We propose a new approach which explicates the network's depth' as a fundamental variable, thus reducing the problem to a system of forward-facing initial value problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T22:00:41Z)
• Training Integrable Parameterizations of Deep Neural Networks in the Infinite-Width Limit [0.0]
  Large-width dynamics has emerged as a fruitful viewpoint and led to practical insights on real-world deep networks. For two-layer neural networks, it has been understood that the nature of the trained model radically changes depending on the scale of the initial random weights. We propose various methods to avoid this trivial behavior and analyze in detail the resulting dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T07:53:35Z)
• Fast Adaptation with Linearized Neural Networks [35.43406281230279]
  We study the inductive biases of linearizations of neural networks, which we show to be surprisingly good summaries of the full network functions. Inspired by this finding, we propose a technique for embedding these inductive biases into Gaussian processes through a kernel designed from the Jacobian of the network. In this setting, domain adaptation takes the form of interpretable posterior inference, with accompanying uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T03:23:03Z)
• Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Study [69.07049353209463]
  kernel methods outperform fully-connected finite-width networks. Centered and ensembled finite networks have reduced posterior variance. Weight decay and the use of a large learning rate break the correspondence between finite and infinite networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T01:57:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.