To think inside the box, or to think out of the box? Scientific
discovery via the reciprocation of insights and concepts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00258v2
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 09:04:30 GMT
- Title: To think inside the box, or to think out of the box? Scientific
discovery via the reciprocation of insights and concepts
- Authors: Yu-Zhe Shi, Manjie Xu, Wenjuan Han, Yixin Zhu
- Abstract summary: We view scientific discovery as an interplay between $thinking out of the box$ that actively seeks insightful solutions.
We propose Mindle, a semantic searching game that triggers scientific-discovery-like thinking spontaneously.
On this basis, the meta-strategies for insights and the usage of concepts can be investigated reciprocally.
- Score: 26.218943558900552
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: If scientific discovery is one of the main driving forces of human progress,
insight is the fuel for the engine, which has long attracted behavior-level
research to understand and model its underlying cognitive process. However,
current tasks that abstract scientific discovery mostly focus on the emergence
of insight, ignoring the special role played by domain knowledge. In this
concept paper, we view scientific discovery as an interplay between $thinking \
out \ of \ the \ box$ that actively seeks insightful solutions and $thinking \
inside \ the \ box$ that generalizes on conceptual domain knowledge to keep
correct. Accordingly, we propose Mindle, a semantic searching game that
triggers scientific-discovery-like thinking spontaneously, as infrastructure
for exploring scientific discovery on a large scale. On this basis, the
meta-strategies for insights and the usage of concepts can be investigated
reciprocally. In the pilot studies, several interesting observations inspire
elaborated hypotheses on meta-strategies, context, and individual diversity for
further investigations.
Related papers
- LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery [141.39722070734737]
We propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of Large Language Models with the computational strength of simulations.
We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework.
We conduct experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in law discovery and molecular design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T03:04:10Z) - Computational Thought Experiments for a More Rigorous Philosophy and Science of the Mind [7.101125921299772]
We offer philosophical motivations for a method we call Virtual World Cognitive Science (VW CogSci)
Researchers use virtual embodied agents that are embedded in virtual worlds to explore questions in the field of Cognitive Science.
We focus on questions about mental and linguistic representation and the ways that such computational modeling can add rigor to philosophical thought experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T03:58:19Z) - Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology.
We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table.
It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z) - Intrinsic Physical Concepts Discovery with Object-Centric Predictive
Models [86.25460882547581]
We introduce the PHYsical Concepts Inference NEtwork (PHYCINE), a system that infers physical concepts in different abstract levels without supervision.
We show that object representations containing the discovered physical concepts variables could help achieve better performance in causal reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-03T11:52:21Z) - Memory-Augmented Theory of Mind Network [59.9781556714202]
Social reasoning requires the capacity of theory of mind (ToM) to contextualise and attribute mental states to others.
Recent machine learning approaches to ToM have demonstrated that we can train the observer to read the past and present behaviours of other agents.
We tackle the challenges by equipping the observer with novel neural memory mechanisms to encode, and hierarchical attention to selectively retrieve information about others.
This results in ToMMY, a theory of mind model that learns to reason while making little assumptions about the underlying mental processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-17T14:48:58Z) - Deep Learning to See: Towards New Foundations of Computer Vision [88.69805848302266]
This book criticizes the supposed scientific progress in the field of computer vision.
It proposes the investigation of vision within the framework of information-based laws of nature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T15:20:36Z) - Acquiring and Modelling Abstract Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualization [49.00409552570441]
We study the role of conceptualization in commonsense reasoning, and formulate a framework to replicate human conceptual induction.
We apply the framework to ATOMIC, a large-scale human-annotated CKG, aided by the taxonomy Probase.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-03T12:24:49Z) - Mind the gap: Challenges of deep learning approaches to Theory of Mind [0.0]
Theory of Mind is an essential ability of humans to infer the mental states of others.
Here we provide a coherent summary of the potential, current progress, and problems of deep learning approaches to Theory of Mind.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T15:48:05Z) - A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physics [1.3190581566723918]
intuitive physics is a cognitive ability that is commonly known as intuitive physics.
Many of the contemporary approaches in modelling intuitive physics for machine cognition have been inspired by literature from cognitive science.
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of recent advances and techniques in intuitive physics-inspired deep learning approaches for physical reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-14T04:44:44Z) - How can scientists establish an observer-independent science? Embodied cognition, consciousness and quantum mechanics [0.0]
Evidence is growing for the theory of embodied cognition.
In particular, we conjecture that an embodied scientist doing experiments must be described from the perspective of another scientist.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-28T18:39:24Z) - Will This Idea Spread Beyond Academia? Understanding Knowledge Transfer
of Scientific Concepts across Text Corpora [18.76916879679805]
We study translational research at the level of scientific concepts for all scientific fields.
We extract scientific concepts from corpora as instantiations of "research ideas"
We then follow the trajectories of over 450,000 new concepts to identify factors that lead only a small proportion of these ideas to be used in inventions and drug trials.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T19:46:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.