Montague semantics and modifier consistency measurement in neural language models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04310v2
• Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 14:11:43 GMT
• Title: Montague semantics and modifier consistency measurement in neural language models
• Authors: Danilo S. Carvalho, Edoardo Manino, Julia Rozanova, Lucas Cordeiro, Andr\'e Freitas
• Abstract summary: This work proposes a methodology for measuring compositional behavior in contemporary language models. Specifically, we focus on adjectival modifier phenomena in adjective-noun phrases. Our experimental results indicate that current neural language models behave according to the expected linguistic theories to a limited extent only.
• Score: 1.6799377888527685
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, distributional language representation models have demonstrated great practical success. At the same time, the need for interpretability has elicited questions on their intrinsic properties and capabilities. Crucially, distributional models are often inconsistent when dealing with compositional phenomena in natural language, which has significant implications for their safety and fairness. Despite this, most current research on compositionality is directed towards improving their performance on similarity tasks only. This work takes a different approach, and proposes a methodology for measuring compositional behavior in contemporary language models. Specifically, we focus on adjectival modifier phenomena in adjective-noun phrases. We introduce three novel tests of compositional behavior inspired by Montague semantics. Our experimental results indicate that current neural language models behave according to the expected linguistic theories to a limited extent only. This raises the question of whether these language models are not able to capture the semantic properties we evaluated, or whether linguistic theories from Montagovian tradition would not match the expected capabilities of distributional models.

Related papers

• Investigating Idiomaticity in Word Representations [9.208145117062339]
  We focus on noun compounds of varying levels of idiomaticity in two languages (English and Portuguese) We present a dataset of minimal pairs containing human idiomaticity judgments for each noun compound at both type and token levels. We define a set of fine-grained metrics of Affinity and Scaled Similarity to determine how sensitive the models are to perturbations that may lead to changes in idiomaticity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:05:01Z)
• UNcommonsense Reasoning: Abductive Reasoning about Uncommon Situations [62.71847873326847]
  We investigate the ability to model unusual, unexpected, and unlikely situations. Given a piece of context with an unexpected outcome, this task requires reasoning abductively to generate an explanation. We release a new English language corpus called UNcommonsense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T19:00:55Z)
• Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds [59.71218039095155]
  We evaluate language understanding capacities on simple inference tasks that most humans find trivial. We target (i) grammatically-specified entailments, (ii) premises with evidential adverbs of uncertainty, and (iii) monotonicity entailments. The models exhibit moderate to low performance on these evaluation sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:41:09Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Integrating Linguistic Theory and Neural Language Models [2.870517198186329]
  I present several case studies to illustrate how theoretical linguistics and neural language models are still relevant to each other. This thesis contributes three studies that explore different aspects of the syntax-semantics interface in language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T04:20:46Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)
• Schr\"odinger's Tree -- On Syntax and Neural Language Models [10.296219074343785]
  Language models have emerged as NLP's workhorse, displaying increasingly fluent generation capabilities. We observe a lack of clarity across numerous dimensions, which influences the hypotheses that researchers form. We outline the implications of the different types of research questions exhibited in studies on syntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-17T18:25:23Z)
• Did the Cat Drink the Coffee? Challenging Transformers with Generalized Event Knowledge [59.22170796793179]
  Transformers Language Models (TLMs) were tested on a benchmark for the textitdynamic estimation of thematic fit Our results show that TLMs can reach performances that are comparable to those achieved by SDM. However, additional analysis consistently suggests that TLMs do not capture important aspects of event knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T20:52:26Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• Do Neural Models Learn Systematicity of Monotonicity Inference in Natural Language? [41.649440404203595]
  We introduce a method for evaluating whether neural models can learn systematicity of monotonicity inference in natural language. We consider four aspects of monotonicity inferences and test whether the models can systematically interpret lexical and logical phenomena on different training/test splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T14:48:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.