Rainproof: An Umbrella To Shield Text Generators From Out-Of-Distribution Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09171v2
• Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 19:06:58 GMT
• Title: Rainproof: An Umbrella To Shield Text Generators From Out-Of-Distribution Data
• Authors: Maxime Darrin, Pablo Piantanida, Pierre Colombo
• Abstract summary: Key ingredient to ensure safe system behaviour is Out-Of-Distribution detection. Most methods rely on hidden features output by the encoder. In this work, we focus on leveraging soft-probabilities in a black-box framework.
• Score: 41.62897997865578
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Implementing effective control mechanisms to ensure the proper functioning and security of deployed NLP models, from translation to chatbots, is essential. A key ingredient to ensure safe system behaviour is Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) detection, which aims to detect whether an input sample is statistically far from the training distribution. Although OOD detection is a widely covered topic in classification tasks, most methods rely on hidden features output by the encoder. In this work, we focus on leveraging soft-probabilities in a black-box framework, i.e. we can access the soft-predictions but not the internal states of the model. Our contributions include: (i) RAINPROOF a Relative informAItioN Projection OOD detection framework; and (ii) a more operational evaluation setting for OOD detection. Surprisingly, we find that OOD detection is not necessarily aligned with task-specific measures. The OOD detector may filter out samples well processed by the model and keep samples that are not, leading to weaker performance. Our results show that RAINPROOF provides OOD detection methods more aligned with task-specific performance metrics than traditional OOD detectors.

Related papers

• The Best of Both Worlds: On the Dilemma of Out-of-distribution Detection [75.65876949930258]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for model trustworthiness. We show that the superior OOD detection performance of state-of-the-art methods is achieved by secretly sacrificing the OOD generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:02:04Z)
• Fast Decision Boundary based Out-of-Distribution Detector [7.04686607977352]
  Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection is essential for the safe deployment of AI systems. Existing feature space methods, while effective, often incur significant computational overhead. We propose a computationally-efficient OOD detector without using auxiliary models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T19:50:32Z)
• Classical Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods Benchmark in Text Classification Tasks [0.0]
  State-of-the-art models can perform well in controlled environments, but they often struggle when presented with out-of-distribution (OOD) examples. In this paper, we focus on highlighting the limitations of existing approaches to OOD detection in NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T18:06:12Z)
• SR-OOD: Out-of-Distribution Detection via Sample Repairing [48.272537939227206]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a crucial task for ensuring the reliability and robustness of machine learning models. Recent works have shown that generative models often assign high confidence scores to OOD samples, indicating that they fail to capture the semantic information of the data. We take advantage of sample repairing and propose a novel OOD detection framework, namely SR-OOD. Our framework achieves superior performance over the state-of-the-art generative methods in OOD detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T16:35:20Z)
• Is Fine-tuning Needed? Pre-trained Language Models Are Near Perfect for Out-of-Domain Detection [28.810524375810736]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a critical task for reliable predictions over text. Fine-tuning with pre-trained language models has been a de facto procedure to derive OOD detectors. We show that using distance-based detection methods, pre-trained language models are near-perfect OOD detectors when the distribution shift involves a domain change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:42:44Z)
• Rethinking Out-of-distribution (OOD) Detection: Masked Image Modeling is All You Need [52.88953913542445]
  We find surprisingly that simply using reconstruction-based methods could boost the performance of OOD detection significantly. We take Masked Image Modeling as a pretext task for our OOD detection framework (MOOD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T08:24:41Z)
• Learn what you can't learn: Regularized Ensembles for Transductive Out-of-distribution Detection [76.39067237772286]
  We show that current out-of-distribution (OOD) detection algorithms for neural networks produce unsatisfactory results in a variety of OOD detection scenarios. This paper studies how such "hard" OOD scenarios can benefit from adjusting the detection method after observing a batch of the test data. We propose a novel method that uses an artificial labeling scheme for the test data and regularization to obtain ensembles of models that produce contradictory predictions only on the OOD samples in a test batch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T16:55:13Z)
• Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detection [36.61315534166451]
  This paper proposes and investigates the use of contrastive training to boost OOD detection performance. We show in extensive experiments that contrastive training significantly helps OOD detection performance on a number of common benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-10T18:40:37Z)
• Robust Out-of-distribution Detection for Neural Networks [51.19164318924997]
  We show that existing detection mechanisms can be extremely brittle when evaluating on in-distribution and OOD inputs. We propose an effective algorithm called ALOE, which performs robust training by exposing the model to both adversarially crafted inlier and outlier examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-21T17:46:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.