Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09597v8
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:47:13 GMT
- Title: Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey
- Authors: Shuofei Qiao, Yixin Ou, Ningyu Zhang, Xiang Chen, Yunzhi Yao, Shumin
Deng, Chuanqi Tan, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen
- Abstract summary: Reasoning, as an essential ability for complex problem-solving, can provide back-end support for various real-world applications.
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge research on reasoning with language model prompting.
- Score: 86.96133788869092
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Reasoning, as an essential ability for complex problem-solving, can provide
back-end support for various real-world applications, such as medical
diagnosis, negotiation, etc. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of
cutting-edge research on reasoning with language model prompting. We introduce
research works with comparisons and summaries and provide systematic resources
to help beginners. We also discuss the potential reasons for emerging such
reasoning abilities and highlight future research directions. Resources are
available at https://github.com/zjunlp/Prompt4ReasoningPapers (updated
periodically).
Related papers
- Diagnostic Reasoning in Natural Language: Computational Model and Application [68.47402386668846]
We investigate diagnostic abductive reasoning (DAR) in the context of language-grounded tasks (NL-DAR)
We propose a novel modeling framework for NL-DAR based on Pearl's structural causal models.
We use the resulting dataset to investigate the human decision-making process in NL-DAR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T06:55:37Z) - Survey on Reasoning Capabilities and Accessibility of Large Language Models Using Biology-related Questions [0.0]
This research paper discusses the advances made in the past decade in biomedicine and Large Language Models.
To understand how the advances have been made hand-in-hand with one another, the paper also discusses the integration of Natural Language Processing techniques and tools into biomedicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-11T20:25:40Z) - A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models [235.7288855108172]
Reasoning plays a pivotal role in various real-world settings such as negotiation, medical diagnosis, and criminal investigation.
We introduce seminal foundation models proposed or adaptable for reasoning.
We then delve into the potential future directions behind the emergence of reasoning abilities within foundation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-17T15:16:13Z) - Explanatory Argument Extraction of Correct Answers in Resident Medical
Exams [5.399800035598185]
We present a new dataset which includes not only explanatory arguments for the correct answer, but also arguments to reason why the incorrect answers are not correct.
This new benchmark allows us to setup a novel extractive task which consists of identifying the explanation of the correct answer written by medical doctors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T13:22:35Z) - Neural Conversation Models and How to Rein Them in: A Survey of Failures
and Fixes [17.489075240435348]
Recent conditional language models are able to continue any kind of text source in an often seemingly fluent way.
From a linguistic perspective, contributing to a conversation is high.
Recent approaches try to tame the underlying language models at various intervention points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-11T12:07:45Z) - ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational
Finance Question Answering [70.6359636116848]
We propose a new large-scale dataset, ConvFinQA, to study the chain of numerical reasoning in conversational question answering.
Our dataset poses great challenge in modeling long-range, complex numerical reasoning paths in real-world conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-07T23:48:50Z) - Rethinking Explainability as a Dialogue: A Practitioner's Perspective [57.87089539718344]
We ask doctors, healthcare professionals, and policymakers about their needs and desires for explanations.
Our study indicates that decision-makers would strongly prefer interactive explanations in the form of natural language dialogues.
Considering these needs, we outline a set of five principles researchers should follow when designing interactive explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-03T22:17:21Z) - A Survey on Interpretable Reinforcement Learning [28.869513255570077]
This survey provides an overview of various approaches to achieve higher interpretability in reinforcement learning (RL)
We distinguish interpretability (as a property of a model) and explainability (as a post-hoc operation, with the intervention of a proxy)
We argue that interpretable RL may embrace different facets: interpretable inputs, interpretable (transition/reward) models, and interpretable decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-24T17:26:57Z) - Discrete Reasoning Templates for Natural Language Understanding [79.07883990966077]
We present an approach that reasons about complex questions by decomposing them to simpler subquestions.
We derive the final answer according to instructions in a predefined reasoning template.
We show that our approach is competitive with the state-of-the-art while being interpretable and requires little supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-05T18:56:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.