Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10450v2
• Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:11:50 GMT
• Title: Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?
• Authors: Bosheng Ding, Chengwei Qin, Linlin Liu, Yew Ken Chia, Shafiq Joty, Boyang Li, Lidong Bing
• Abstract summary: GPT-3 is a large-scale language model developed by OpenAI. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GPT-3 as a data annotator.
• Score: 30.9559541574174
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Data annotation is the process of labeling data that could be used to train machine learning models. Having high-quality annotation is crucial, as it allows the model to learn the relationship between the input data and the desired output. GPT-3, a large-scale language model developed by OpenAI, has demonstrated impressive zero- and few-shot performance on a wide range of NLP tasks. It is therefore natural to wonder whether it can be used to effectively annotate data for NLP tasks. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GPT-3 as a data annotator by comparing it with traditional data annotation methods and analyzing its output on a range of tasks. Through this analysis, we aim to provide insight into the potential of GPT-3 as a general-purpose data annotator in NLP.

Related papers

• Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration [90.41908331897639]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly benefited from training on diverse, high-quality task-specific data. We present a novel approach, ReverseGen, designed to automatically generate effective training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T06:43:28Z)
• CYGENT: A cybersecurity conversational agent with log summarization powered by GPT-3 [0.08192907805418582]
  CYGENT is a conversational agent framework powered by GPT-3.5 turbo model. It provides cybersecurity information, analyzing and summarizing uploaded log files, detecting specific events, and delivering essential instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T20:17:04Z)
• Does fine-tuning GPT-3 with the OpenAI API leak personally-identifiable information? [1.7590081165362783]
  We simulate a privacy attack on GPT-3 using OpenAI's fine-tuning API. Our objective is to determine if personally identifiable information (PII) can be extracted from this model. Our findings reveal that fine-tuning GPT3 for both tasks led to the model memorizing and disclosing critical personally identifiable information (PII) obtained from the underlying fine-tuning dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T03:17:51Z)
• Prefer to Classify: Improving Text Classifiers via Auxiliary Preference Learning [76.43827771613127]
  In this paper, we investigate task-specific preferences between pairs of input texts as a new alternative way for such auxiliary data annotation. We propose a novel multi-task learning framework, called prefer-to-classify (P2C), which can enjoy the cooperative effect of learning both the given classification task and the auxiliary preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T04:04:47Z)
• AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators [98.11286353828525]
  GPT-3.5 series models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot and zero-shot ability across various NLP tasks. We propose AnnoLLM, which adopts a two-step approach, explain-then-annotate. We build the first conversation-based information retrieval dataset employing AnnoLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T17:03:21Z)
• Improving Short Text Classification With Augmented Data Using GPT-3 [0.0]
  GPT-3 is a large-scale natural language model developed by OpenAI. This study teaches GPT-3 to classify whether a question is related to data science by augmenting a small training set with additional examples. We find that while the augmented Completion achieves upwards of 80 percent validation accuracy, using the augmented Classification yields more consistent accuracy on unseen examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T01:10:38Z)
• Data Augmentation for Intent Classification with Off-the-shelf Large Language Models [13.895236210726202]
  We propose a prompting-based approach to generate labelled training data for intent classification with off-the-shelf language models. We evaluate the proposed method in a few-shot setting on four diverse intent classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T03:29:26Z)
• Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts [62.63504976810927]
  We propose methods to facilitate identification of training data artifacts. We show that this proposed training-feature attribution approach can be used to uncover artifacts in training data. We execute a small user study to evaluate whether these methods are useful to NLP researchers in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T09:26:13Z)
• DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach for Low-resource Tagging Tasks [88.62288327934499]
  We propose a novel augmentation method with language models trained on the linearized labeled sentences. Our method is applicable to both supervised and semi-supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T07:49:15Z)
• Language Models are Few-Shot Learners [61.36677350504291]
  We show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance. We train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T17:29:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.