Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval for Cross-document Relation Extraction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10786v2
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 00:43:13 GMT
- Title: Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval for Cross-document Relation Extraction
- Authors: Keming Lu, I-Hung Hsu, Wenxuan Zhou, Mingyu Derek Ma and Muhao Chen
- Abstract summary: We propose MR.COD (Multi-hop evidence retrieval for Cross-document relation extraction), which is a multi-hop evidence retrieval method based on evidence path mining and ranking.
Experiments on CodRED show that evidence retrieval with MR.COD effectively acquires crossdocument evidence and boosts end-to-end RE performance in both closed and open settings.
- Score: 23.98136192661566
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Relation Extraction (RE) has been extended to cross-document scenarios
because many relations are not simply described in a single document. This
inevitably brings the challenge of efficient open-space evidence retrieval to
support the inference of cross-document relations, along with the challenge of
multi-hop reasoning on top of entities and evidence scattered in an open set of
documents. To combat these challenges, we propose MR.COD (Multi-hop evidence
retrieval for Cross-document relation extraction), which is a multi-hop
evidence retrieval method based on evidence path mining and ranking. We explore
multiple variants of retrievers to show evidence retrieval is essential in
cross-document RE. We also propose a contextual dense retriever for this
setting. Experiments on CodRED show that evidence retrieval with MR.COD
effectively acquires crossdocument evidence and boosts end-to-end RE
performance in both closed and open settings.
Related papers
- Learning More Effective Representations for Dense Retrieval through Deliberate Thinking Before Search [65.53881294642451]
Deliberate Thinking based Dense Retriever (DEBATER)
DEBATER enhances recent dense retrievers by enabling them to learn more effective document representations through a step-by-step thinking process.
Experimental results show that DEBATER significantly outperforms existing methods across several retrieval benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:56:34Z) - Unified Multimodal Interleaved Document Representation for Retrieval [57.65409208879344]
We propose a method that holistically embeds documents interleaved with multiple modalities.
We merge the representations of segmented passages into one single document representation.
We show that our approach substantially outperforms relevant baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T17:49:09Z) - Reward-based Input Construction for Cross-document Relation Extraction [11.52832308525974]
Cross-document Relation extraction (RE) is a fundamental task in natural language processing.
We propose REward-based Input Construction (REIC), the first learning-based sentence selector for cross-document RE.
REIC extracts sentences based on relational evidence, enabling the RE module to effectively infer relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T07:30:34Z) - DAPR: A Benchmark on Document-Aware Passage Retrieval [57.45793782107218]
We propose and name this task emphDocument-Aware Passage Retrieval (DAPR)
While analyzing the errors of the State-of-The-Art (SoTA) passage retrievers, we find the major errors (53.5%) are due to missing document context.
Our created benchmark enables future research on developing and comparing retrieval systems for the new task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T10:39:57Z) - Complex Claim Verification with Evidence Retrieved in the Wild [73.19998942259073]
We present the first fully automated pipeline to check real-world claims by retrieving raw evidence from the web.
Our pipeline includes five components: claim decomposition, raw document retrieval, fine-grained evidence retrieval, claim-focused summarization, and veracity judgment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T17:49:19Z) - Natural Logic-guided Autoregressive Multi-hop Document Retrieval for
Fact Verification [21.04611844009438]
We propose a novel retrieve-and-rerank method for multi-hop retrieval.
It consists of a retriever that jointly scores documents in the knowledge source and sentences from previously retrieved documents.
It is guided by a proof system that dynamically terminates the retrieval process if the evidence is deemed sufficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-10T11:32:38Z) - Entity-centered Cross-document Relation Extraction [34.38369224008656]
Relation Extraction (RE) is a fundamental task of information extraction, which has attracted a large amount of research attention.
Previous studies focus on extracting the relations within a sentence or document, while currently researchers begin to explore cross-document RE.
In this paper, we aim to address both of these shortages and push the state-of-the-art for cross-document RE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-29T09:27:15Z) - GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion.
The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z) - Eider: Evidence-enhanced Document-level Relation Extraction [56.71004595444816]
Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims at extracting semantic relations among entity pairs in a document.
We propose a three-stage evidence-enhanced DocRE framework consisting of joint relation and evidence extraction, evidence-centered relation extraction (RE), and fusion of extraction results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-16T09:43:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.