Factors Influencing Intention to use the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Application

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10770v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 03:12:44 GMT
• Title: Factors Influencing Intention to use the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Application
• Authors: Vinh T. Nguyen and Chuyen T. H. Nguyen
• Abstract summary: Performance expectations, trust, and privacy all have an impact on app usage intention. Social impact, effort expectation, and facilitating conditions were not shown to be statistically significant.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study investigated the effects of variables influencing the intention to use the COVID-19 tracker. Experiment results from 224 individuals revealed that performance expectations, trust, and privacy all have an impact on app usage intention. However, social impact, effort expectation, and facilitating conditions were not shown to be statistically significant. The conceptual model explained 60.07 percent of the amount of variation, suggesting that software developers, service providers, and policymakers should consider performance expectations, trust, and privacy as viable factors to encourage citizens to use the app

Related papers

• Beyond Trial-and-Error: Predicting User Abandonment After a Moderation Intervention [0.6918368994425961]
  Current content moderation follows a reactive, trial-and-error approach. We introduce a proactive, predictive approach that enables moderators to anticipate the impact of their actions before implementation. We study the reactions of 16,540 users to a massive ban of online communities on Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T08:52:41Z)
• Improving Personalisation in Valence and Arousal Prediction using Data Augmentation [2.447631206868802]
  This paper presents our work on an enhanced personalisation strategy, that leverages data augmentation to develop tailored models. Our proposed approach, Distance Weighting Augmentation (DWA), employs a weighting-based augmentation method that expands a target individual's dataset. Experimental results on the MuSe-Personalisation 2023 Challenge dataset demonstrate that our method significantly improves the performance of features sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T16:57:37Z)
• Fairness Concerns in App Reviews: A Study on AI-based Mobile Apps [9.948068408730654]
  This research aims to investigate fairness concerns raised in mobile app reviews. Our research focuses on AI-based mobile app reviews as the chance of unfair behaviors and outcomes in AI-based apps may be higher than in non-AI-based apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T03:43:33Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-sectional Survey Analysis [1.9580473532948401]
  This study investigated how perceived workload, satisfaction, performance expectancy, and risk-benefit perception influenced users' trust in Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) A semi-structured, web-based survey was conducted among adults in the United States who actively use ChatGPT at least once a month.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T16:06:11Z)
• Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
  SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics. Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z)
• Measuring the Effect of Influential Messages on Varying Personas [67.1149173905004]
  We present a new task, Response Forecasting on Personas for News Media, to estimate the response a persona might have upon seeing a news message. The proposed task not only introduces personalization in the modeling but also predicts the sentiment polarity and intensity of each response. This enables more accurate and comprehensive inference on the mental state of the persona.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T21:01:00Z)
• A Comprehensive Picture of Factors Affecting User Willingness to Use Mobile Health Applications [62.60524178293434]
  The aim of this paper is to investigate the factors that influence user acceptance of mHealth apps. Users' digital literacy has the strongest impact on their willingness to use them, followed by their online habit of sharing personal information. Users' demographic background, such as their country of residence, age, ethnicity, and education, has a significant moderating effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T08:11:21Z)
• Fair Effect Attribution in Parallel Online Experiments [57.13281584606437]
  A/B tests serve the purpose of reliably identifying the effect of changes introduced in online services. It is common for online platforms to run a large number of simultaneous experiments by splitting incoming user traffic randomly. Despite a perfect randomization between different groups, simultaneous experiments can interact with each other and create a negative impact on average population outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:15:51Z)
• DAPPER: Label-Free Performance Estimation after Personalization for Heterogeneous Mobile Sensing [95.18236298557721]
  We present DAPPER (Domain AdaPtation Performance EstimatoR) that estimates the adaptation performance in a target domain with unlabeled target data. Our evaluation with four real-world sensing datasets compared against six baselines shows that DAPPER outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline by 39.8% in estimation accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:49:33Z)
• How good is good enough for COVID19 apps? The influence of benefits, accuracy, and privacy on willingness to adopt [24.202334512830255]
  A growing number of contact tracing apps are being developed to complement manual contact tracing. We evaluate the effect of both accuracy and privacy concerns on reported willingness to install COVID19 contact tracing apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T01:53:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.