Do Embodied Agents Dream of Pixelated Sheep: Embodied Decision Making using Language Guided World Modelling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12050v2
• Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:14:01 GMT
• Title: Do Embodied Agents Dream of Pixelated Sheep: Embodied Decision Making using Language Guided World Modelling
• Authors: Kolby Nottingham, Prithviraj Ammanabrolu, Alane Suhr, Yejin Choi, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Sameer Singh, Roy Fox
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) agents typically learn tabula rasa, without prior knowledge of the world. We propose using few-shot large language models (LLMs) to hypothesize an Abstract World Model (AWM) Our method of hypothesizing an AWM with LLMs and then verifying the AWM based on agent experience not only increases sample efficiency over contemporary methods by an order of magnitude.
• Score: 101.59430768507997
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) agents typically learn tabula rasa, without prior knowledge of the world. However, if initialized with knowledge of high-level subgoals and transitions between subgoals, RL agents could utilize this Abstract World Model (AWM) for planning and exploration. We propose using few-shot large language models (LLMs) to hypothesize an AWM, that will be verified through world experience, to improve sample efficiency of RL agents. Our DECKARD agent applies LLM-guided exploration to item crafting in Minecraft in two phases: (1) the Dream phase where the agent uses an LLM to decompose a task into a sequence of subgoals, the hypothesized AWM; and (2) the Wake phase where the agent learns a modular policy for each subgoal and verifies or corrects the hypothesized AWM. Our method of hypothesizing an AWM with LLMs and then verifying the AWM based on agent experience not only increases sample efficiency over contemporary methods by an order of magnitude but is also robust to and corrects errors in the LLM, successfully blending noisy internet-scale information from LLMs with knowledge grounded in environment dynamics.

Related papers

• From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems [59.40480894948944]
  Large language model (LLM) empowered agents are able to solve decision-making problems in the physical world. Under this model, the LLM Planner navigates a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) by iteratively generating language-based subgoals via prompting. We prove that the pretrained LLM Planner effectively performs Bayesian aggregated imitation learning (BAIL) through in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T09:42:54Z)
• Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Large Language Model-based Search [27.307583105810895]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly gained prominence across a magnitude of natural language tasks. We propose MEDIC: a framework that augments LLMs with a Model-based feEDback critIC to generate a possibly sub-optimal but valid plan for an abstract problem. Our experiments show 1) the effectiveness of augmenting LLMs with MEDIC, 2) a significant improvement in the sample complexity of PPO and A2C-based RL agents when guided by our LLM-generated plan, and 3) pave the direction for further explorations of how these models can be used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T03:53:57Z)
• Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [70.09561665520043]
  We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans. We provide theoretical analysis by extending advantage-weighted regression in reinforcement learning to multi-agent systems. Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z)
• EnvGen: Generating and Adapting Environments via LLMs for Training Embodied Agents [65.38474102119181]
  We propose EnvGen, a framework to adaptively create training environments. We train a small RL agent in a mixture of the original and LLM-generated environments. We find that a small RL agent trained with EnvGen can outperform SOTA methods, including a GPT-4 agent, and learns long-horizon tasks significantly faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:51:16Z)
• How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities. We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z)
• True Knowledge Comes from Practice: Aligning LLMs with Embodied Environments via Reinforcement Learning [37.10401435242991]
  Large language models (LLMs) often fail in solving simple decision-making tasks due to misalignment of the knowledge in LLMs with environments. We propose TWOSOME, a novel framework that deploys LLMs as decision-making agents to efficiently interact and align with embodied environments via RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T13:03:20Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• LgTS: Dynamic Task Sampling using LLM-generated sub-goals for Reinforcement Learning Agents [10.936460061405157]
  We propose LgTS (LLM-guided Teacher-Student learning), a novel approach that explores the planning abilities of LLMs. Our approach does not assume access to a propreitary or a fine-tuned LLM, nor does it require pre-trained policies that achieve the sub-goals proposed by the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T00:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.