A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms in Decision-Making in Higher Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05839v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 02:30:50 GMT
• Title: A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms in Decision-Making in Higher Education
• Authors: Kelly McConvey, Shion Guha, Anastasia Kuzminykh
• Abstract summary: We reviewed an extensive corpus of papers proposing algorithms for decision-making in higher education. We found that the models are trending towards deep learning, and increased use of student personal data and protected attributes. Despite the associated decrease in interpretability and explainability, current development predominantly fails to incorporate human-centered lenses.
• Score: 16.578096382702597
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The use of algorithms for decision-making in higher education is steadily growing, promising cost-savings to institutions and personalized service for students but also raising ethical challenges around surveillance, fairness, and interpretation of data. To address the lack of systematic understanding of how these algorithms are currently designed, we reviewed an extensive corpus of papers proposing algorithms for decision-making in higher education. We categorized them based on input data, computational method, and target outcome, and then investigated the interrelations of these factors with the application of human-centered lenses: theoretical, participatory, or speculative design. We found that the models are trending towards deep learning, and increased use of student personal data and protected attributes, with the target scope expanding towards automated decisions. However, despite the associated decrease in interpretability and explainability, current development predominantly fails to incorporate human-centered lenses. We discuss the challenges with these trends and advocate for a human-centered approach.

Related papers

• Deep Learning-Based Object Pose Estimation: A Comprehensive Survey [73.74933379151419]
  We discuss the recent advances in deep learning-based object pose estimation. Our survey also covers multiple input data modalities, degrees-of-freedom of output poses, object properties, and downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T14:44:22Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Proactive and Reactive Engagement of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Education: A Review [2.2843885788439793]
  We investigate how artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods are being utilized to support students, educators and administrative staff. We consider the involvement of AI-driven methods in the education process in its entirety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-23T02:47:36Z)
• Interpreting Neural Policies with Disentangled Tree Representations [58.769048492254555]
  We study interpretability of compact neural policies through the lens of disentangled representation. We leverage decision trees to obtain factors of variation for disentanglement in robot learning. We introduce interpretability metrics that measure disentanglement of learned neural dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T01:10:41Z)
• A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithms [14.96024118861361]
  We apply the lens of validity to re-examine challenges in problem formulation and data issues that jeopardize the justifiability of using predictive algorithms. We demonstrate how these validity considerations could distill into a series of high-level questions intended to promote and document reflections on the legitimacy of the predictive task and the suitability of the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T02:22:31Z)
• A Human-Centric Perspective on Fairness and Transparency in Algorithmic Decision-Making [0.0]
  Automated decision systems (ADS) are increasingly used for consequential decision-making. Non-transparent systems are prone to yield unfair outcomes because their sanity is challenging to assess and calibrate. I aim to make the following three main contributions through my doctoral thesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T18:31:04Z)
• Evaluation Methods and Measures for Causal Learning Algorithms [33.07234268724662]
  We focus on the two fundamental causal-inference tasks and causality-aware machine learning tasks. The survey seeks to bring to the forefront the urgency of developing publicly available benchmarks and consensus-building standards for causal learning evaluation with observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T00:24:34Z)
• Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
  The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal. In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)
• FairCVtest Demo: Understanding Bias in Multimodal Learning with a Testbed in Fair Automatic Recruitment [79.23531577235887]
  This demo shows the capacity of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) behind a recruitment tool to extract sensitive information from unstructured data. Aditionally, the demo includes a new algorithm for discrimination-aware learning which eliminates sensitive information in our multimodal AI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T17:45:09Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.