Response: Commentary: Is the moon there if nobody looks? Bell inequalities and physical reality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08061v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 03:52:27 GMT
• Title: Response: Commentary: Is the moon there if nobody looks? Bell inequalities and physical reality
• Authors: Marian Kupczynski
• Abstract summary: Gill and Lambare completely misinterpret the content and conclusions of this article. Their model defines a probabilistic coupling for our model describing only the raw data from Bell tests. Inequalities cannot be derived because our model violates statistical independence.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We reject unjustified criticism of our published article [2209.07992] by Gill and Lambare [arXiv:2211.02481, arXiv:2208.09930]. They completely misinterpret the content and conclusions of this article. They construct a counterfactual probabilistic model in which random variables representing outcomes of four experiments performed using incompatible experimental settings are jointly distributed. Thus, CHSH inequalities trivially hold for all finite samples generated by their model. Their model defines a probabilistic coupling for our model describing only the raw data from Bell tests. The existence of this coupling does not invalidate the derivation of the contextual probabilistic model describing the final data from Bell tests. Only these final data are used to test Bell inequalities. Inequalities cannot be derived because our model violates statistical independence. Our contextual model allows to explain in a local and causal way the violation of inequalities and the apparent violation of no-signaling reported in these experiments.

Related papers

• Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
  Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed. In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z)
• Response: Kupczynski Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are constrained by Bell theorem [0.0]
  In our contextual model, statistical independence is violated, thus it is not constrained by Bell Theorem. In several Bell Tests, two time series of distant clicks are converted into finite samples containing pairs of non zero outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T20:09:01Z)
• An Appropriate Probability Model for the Bell Experiment [0.0]
  The Bell inequality constrains the outcomes of measurements on pairs of distant entangled particles. The Bell contradiction states that the Bell inequality is inconsistent with the calculated outcomes of these quantum experiments. This paper proposes an appropriate probability model for the Bell experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T11:08:23Z)
• Bi-Noising Diffusion: Towards Conditional Diffusion Models with Generative Restoration Priors [64.24948495708337]
  We introduce a new method that brings predicted samples to the training data manifold using a pretrained unconditional diffusion model. We perform comprehensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on super-resolution, colorization, turbulence removal, and image-deraining tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T17:26:35Z)
• Is the Moon there if nobody looks: A reply to Gill and Lambare [0.0]
  In a recent preprint Gill and Lambare criticize our paper published in Frontiers in Physics. They define a probabilistic coupling, in which BI-CHSH hold for all finite samples. A joint probability distribution of these random variables does not exist and may not be used to derive inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T14:59:24Z)
• Reconciling Individual Probability Forecasts [78.0074061846588]
  We show that two parties who agree on the data cannot disagree on how to model individual probabilities. We conclude that although individual probabilities are unknowable, they are contestable via a computationally and data efficient process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T20:20:35Z)
• Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell inequality violations via statistical model selection [0.0]
  Bell inequalities follow from a set of seemingly natural assumptions about how to provide a causal model of a Bell experiment. Two types of causal models that modify some of these assumptions have been proposed. We seek to adjudicate between these alternatives based on their predictive power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T19:33:02Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Contextuality scenarios arising from networks of stochastic processes [68.8204255655161]
  An empirical model is said contextual if its distributions cannot be obtained marginalizing a joint distribution over X. We present a different and classical source of contextual empirical models: the interaction among many processes. The statistical behavior of the network in the long run makes the empirical model generically contextual and even strongly contextual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T16:57:52Z)
• Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
  Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic. "Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected. "Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z)
• Is the Moon there if nobody looks: Bell Inequalities and Physical Reality [0.0]
  The violation of various Bell inequalities may neither justify the quantum nonlocality nor allow for doubt regarding the existence of atoms, electrons and other invisible elementary particles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T16:49:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.