What Is Missing in IRM Training and Evaluation? Challenges and Solutions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02343v1
- Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 07:06:24 GMT
- Title: What Is Missing in IRM Training and Evaluation? Challenges and Solutions
- Authors: Yihua Zhang and Pranay Sharma and Parikshit Ram and Mingyi Hong and
Kush Varshney and Sijia Liu
- Abstract summary: Invariant risk minimization (IRM) has received increasing attention as a way to acquire environment-agnostic data representations and predictions.
Recent works have found that the optimality of the originally-proposed IRM optimization (IRM) may be compromised in practice.
We identify and resolve three practical limitations in IRM training and evaluation.
- Score: 41.56612265456626
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Invariant risk minimization (IRM) has received increasing attention as a way
to acquire environment-agnostic data representations and predictions, and as a
principled solution for preventing spurious correlations from being learned and
for improving models' out-of-distribution generalization. Yet, recent works
have found that the optimality of the originally-proposed IRM optimization
(IRM) may be compromised in practice or could be impossible to achieve in some
scenarios. Therefore, a series of advanced IRM algorithms have been developed
that show practical improvement over IRM. In this work, we revisit these recent
IRM advancements, and identify and resolve three practical limitations in IRM
training and evaluation. First, we find that the effect of batch size during
training has been chronically overlooked in previous studies, leaving room for
further improvement. We propose small-batch training and highlight the
improvements over a set of large-batch optimization techniques. Second, we find
that improper selection of evaluation environments could give a false sense of
invariance for IRM. To alleviate this effect, we leverage diversified test-time
environments to precisely characterize the invariance of IRM when applied in
practice. Third, we revisit (Ahuja et al. (2020))'s proposal to convert IRM
into an ensemble game and identify a limitation when a single invariant
predictor is desired instead of an ensemble of individual predictors. We
propose a new IRM variant to address this limitation based on a novel viewpoint
of ensemble IRM games as consensus-constrained bi-level optimization. Lastly,
we conduct extensive experiments (covering 7 existing IRM variants and 7
datasets) to justify the practical significance of revisiting IRM training and
evaluation in a principled manner.
Related papers
- Continual Invariant Risk Minimization [46.051656238770086]
Empirical risk minimization can lead to poor generalization behavior on unseen environments if the learned model does not capture invariant feature representations.
Invariant risk minimization (IRM) is a recent proposal for discovering environment-invariant representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-21T11:44:47Z) - Frustratingly Easy Model Generalization by Dummy Risk Minimization [38.67678021055096]
Dummy Risk Minimization (DuRM) is a frustratingly easy and general technique to improve the generalization of Empirical risk minimization (ERM)
We show that DuRM could consistently improve the performance under all tasks with an almost free lunch manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-04T12:43:54Z) - Learning Optimal Features via Partial Invariance [18.552839725370383]
Invariant Risk Minimization (IRM) is a popular framework that aims to learn robust models from multiple environments.
We show that IRM can over-constrain the predictor and to remedy this, we propose a relaxation via $textitpartial invariance$.
Several experiments, conducted both in linear settings as well as with deep neural networks on tasks over both language and image data, allow us to verify our conclusions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-28T02:48:14Z) - Probable Domain Generalization via Quantile Risk Minimization [90.15831047587302]
Domain generalization seeks predictors which perform well on unseen test distributions.
We propose a new probabilistic framework for DG where the goal is to learn predictors that perform well with high probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T14:41:09Z) - Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization [32.01775861630696]
We propose a new optimization scheme for invariant risk minimization (IRM) called PAreto Invariant Risk Minimization (PAIR)
We show PAIR can empower the practical IRM variants to overcome the barriers with the original IRM when provided with proper guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-15T19:04:02Z) - The Missing Invariance Principle Found -- the Reciprocal Twin of
Invariant Risk Minimization [7.6146285961466]
In Risk Minimization (IRM) can fail to generalize poorly to out-of-distribution (OOD) data.
We show that MRI-v1 can guarantee invariant predictors given sufficient environments.
We also demonstrate that MRI strongly out-performs IRM and achieves a near-optimal OOD in image-based problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T00:14:51Z) - Domain-Adjusted Regression or: ERM May Already Learn Features Sufficient
for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [52.7137956951533]
We argue that devising simpler methods for learning predictors on existing features is a promising direction for future research.
We introduce Domain-Adjusted Regression (DARE), a convex objective for learning a linear predictor that is provably robust under a new model of distribution shift.
Under a natural model, we prove that the DARE solution is the minimax-optimal predictor for a constrained set of test distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-14T16:42:16Z) - Meta-Learned Invariant Risk Minimization [12.6484257912092]
Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) based machine learning algorithms have suffered from weak generalization performance on data obtained from out-of-distribution (OOD)
In this paper, we propose a novel meta-learning based approach for IRM.
We show that our algorithm not only has better OOD generalization performance than IRMv1 and all IRM variants, but also addresses the weakness of IRMv1 with improved stability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-24T02:52:48Z) - Empirical or Invariant Risk Minimization? A Sample Complexity
Perspective [49.43806345820883]
It is unclear when in-variant risk generalization (IRM) should be preferred over the widely-employed empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework.
We find that depending on the type of data generation mechanism, the two approaches might have very different finite sample and behavior.
We further investigate how different factors -- the number of environments, complexity of the model, and IRM penalty weight -- impact the sample complexity of IRM in relation to its distance from the OOD solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-30T17:55:30Z) - The Risks of Invariant Risk Minimization [52.7137956951533]
Invariant Risk Minimization is an objective based on the idea for learning deep, invariant features of data.
We present the first analysis of classification under the IRM objective--as well as these recently proposed alternatives--under a fairly natural and general model.
We show that IRM can fail catastrophically unless the test data are sufficiently similar to the training distribution--this is precisely the issue that it was intended to solve.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-12T14:54:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.