An Annexure to the Paper "Driving the Technology Value Stream by Analyzing App Reviews"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04519v1
• Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:18:27 GMT
• Title: An Annexure to the Paper "Driving the Technology Value Stream by Analyzing App Reviews"
• Authors: Souvick Das, Novarun Deb, Agostino Cortesi and Nabendu Chaki
• Abstract summary: The framework allows software companies to drive their technology value stream based on user reviews. The framework is analyzed in depth, and its modules are evaluated for their effectiveness.
• Score: 3.1733862899654643
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a novel framework that utilizes Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to understand user feedback on mobile applications. The framework allows software companies to drive their technology value stream based on user reviews, which can highlight areas for improvement. The framework is analyzed in depth, and its modules are evaluated for their effectiveness. The proposed approach is demonstrated to be effective through an analysis of reviews for sixteen popular Android Play Store applications over a long period of time.

Related papers

• Scaling Technology Acceptance Analysis with Large Language Model (LLM) Annotation Systems [0.0]
  Technology acceptance models effectively predict how users will adopt new technology products. Traditional surveys, often expensive and cumbersome, are commonly used for this assessment. As an alternative to surveys, we explore the use of large language models for annotating online user-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T14:01:06Z)
• Towards Coarse-to-Fine Evaluation of Inference Efficiency for Large Language Models [95.96734086126469]
  Large language models (LLMs) can serve as the assistant to help users accomplish their jobs, and also support the development of advanced applications. For the wide application of LLMs, the inference efficiency is an essential concern, which has been widely studied in existing work. We perform a detailed coarse-to-fine analysis of the inference performance of various code libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T15:57:50Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
  This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews. The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised. This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review [52.359007622096684]
  Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science. Existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts. editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T16:39:38Z)
• Ranking Scientific Papers Using Preference Learning [48.78161994501516]
  We cast it as a paper ranking problem based on peer review texts and reviewer scores. We introduce a novel, multi-faceted generic evaluation framework for making final decisions based on peer reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T19:41:47Z)
• Android Security using NLP Techniques: A Review [1.218340575383456]
  Android is among the most targeted platform by attackers. Traditional solutions based on static and dynamic analysis have been evolving. This study aims to explore possible research directions for future studies by presenting state-of-the-art in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T08:33:00Z)
• TOUR: Dynamic Topic and Sentiment Analysis of User Reviews for Assisting App Release [34.529117157417176]
  TOUR is able to (i) detect and summarize emerging app issues over app versions, (ii) identify user sentiment towards app features, and (iii) prioritize important user reviews for facilitating developers' examination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T08:44:55Z)
• Sentiment Analysis of Users' Reviews on COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps with a Benchmark Dataset [6.592595861973966]
  Contact tracing has been globally adopted in the fight to control the infection rate of COVID-19. Thanks to digital technologies, such as smartphones and wearable devices, contacts of COVID-19 patients can be easily traced and informed about their potential exposure to the virus. Several interesting mobile applications have been developed. However, there are ever-growing concerns over the working mechanism and performance of these applications. In this work, we propose a pipeline starting from manual annotation via a crowd-sourcing study and concluding on the development and training of AI models for automatic sentiment analysis of users' reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T18:43:10Z)
• Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review Rating Recommendation [81.55533657694016]
  We propose a Hierarchical bi-directional self-attention Network framework (HabNet) for paper review rating prediction and recommendation. Specifically, we leverage the hierarchical structure of the paper reviews with three levels of encoders: sentence encoder (level one), intra-review encoder (level two) and inter-review encoder (level three) We are able to identify useful predictors to make the final acceptance decision, as well as to help discover the inconsistency between numerical review ratings and text sentiment conveyed by reviewers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T08:07:50Z)
• Emerging App Issue Identification via Online Joint Sentiment-Topic Tracing [66.57888248681303]
  We propose a novel emerging issue detection approach named MERIT. Based on the AOBST model, we infer the topics negatively reflected in user reviews for one app version. Experiments on popular apps from Google Play and Apple's App Store demonstrate the effectiveness of MERIT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T06:34:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.