Label Distribution Learning from Logical Label

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06847v2
• Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 05:32:28 GMT
• Title: Label Distribution Learning from Logical Label
• Authors: Yuheng Jia, Jiawei Tang, Jiahao Jiang,
• Abstract summary: Label distribution learning (LDL) is an effective method to predict the label description degree (a.k.a. label distribution) of a sample. But annotating label distribution for training samples is extremely costly. We propose a novel method to learn an LDL model directly from the logical label, which unifies LE and LDL into a joint model.
• Score: 19.632157794117553
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Label distribution learning (LDL) is an effective method to predict the label description degree (a.k.a. label distribution) of a sample. However, annotating label distribution (LD) for training samples is extremely costly. So recent studies often first use label enhancement (LE) to generate the estimated label distribution from the logical label and then apply external LDL algorithms on the recovered label distribution to predict the label distribution for unseen samples. But this step-wise manner overlooks the possible connections between LE and LDL. Moreover, the existing LE approaches may assign some description degrees to invalid labels. To solve the above problems, we propose a novel method to learn an LDL model directly from the logical label, which unifies LE and LDL into a joint model, and avoids the drawbacks of the previous LE methods. Extensive experiments on various datasets prove that the proposed approach can construct a reliable LDL model directly from the logical label, and produce more accurate label distribution than the state-of-the-art LE methods.

Related papers

• Towards Better Performance in Incomplete LDL: Addressing Data Imbalance [48.54894491724677]
  We propose textIncomplete and Imbalance Label Distribution Learning (I(2)LDL), a framework that simultaneously handles incomplete labels and imbalanced label distributions. Our method decomposes the label distribution matrix into a low-rank component for frequent labels and a sparse component for rare labels, effectively capturing the structure of both head and tail labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T14:12:57Z)
• Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning with Dependency Noise [52.08553913094809]
  We introduce the Dependent Noise-based Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning (DN-ILDL) framework to tackle the challenges posed by noise in label distribution learning. We show that DN-ILDL effectively addresses the ILDL problem and outperforms existing LDL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T07:58:07Z)
• Exploiting Multi-Label Correlation in Label Distribution Learning [0.0]
  Label Distribution Learning (LDL) is a novel machine learning paradigm that assigns label distribution to each instance. Recent studies disclosed that label distribution matrices are typically full-rank, posing challenges to works exploiting low-rank label correlation. We introduce an auxiliary MLL process in LDL and capture low-rank label correlation on that MLL rather than LDL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T13:06:45Z)
• Contrastive Label Enhancement [13.628665406039609]
  We propose Contrastive Label Enhancement (ConLE) to generate high-level features by contrastive learning strategy. We leverage the obtained high-level features to gain label distributions through a welldesigned training strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T14:53:07Z)
• Inaccurate Label Distribution Learning [56.89970970094207]
  Label distribution learning (LDL) trains a model to predict the relevance of a set of labels (called label distribution (LD)) to an instance. This paper investigates the problem of inaccurate LDL, i.e., developing an LDL model with noisy LDs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-25T06:23:45Z)
• Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspective [89.5370481649529]
  We propose a label distribution perspective for PU learning in this paper. Motivated by this, we propose to pursue the label distribution consistency between predicted and ground-truth label distributions. Experiments on three benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T07:38:29Z)
• Label distribution learning via label correlation grid [9.340734188957727]
  We propose a textbfLabel textbfCorrelation textbfGrid (LCG) to model the uncertainty of label relationships. Our network learns the LCG to accurately estimate the label distribution for each instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T03:58:15Z)
• One Positive Label is Sufficient: Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning with Label Enhancement [71.9401831465908]
  We investigate single-positive multi-label learning (SPMLL) where each example is annotated with only one relevant label. A novel method named proposed, i.e., Single-positive MultI-label learning with Label Enhancement, is proposed. Experiments on benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T14:26:30Z)
• Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learning [69.49681837908511]
  Partial label learning is a typical weakly supervised learning problem. Most existing approaches assume that the incorrect labels in each training example are randomly picked as the candidate labels. In this paper, we consider instance-dependent and assume that each example is associated with a latent label distribution constituted by the real number of each label.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T12:50:26Z)
• Generalized Label Enhancement with Sample Correlations [24.582764493585362]
  We propose two novel label enhancement methods, i.e., Label Enhancement with Sample Correlations (LESC) and generalized Label Enhancement with Sample Correlations (gLESC) Benefitting from the sample correlations, the proposed methods can boost the performance of label enhancement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T03:32:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.