A Graph-Guided Reasoning Approach for Open-ended Commonsense Question
Answering
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10395v1
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:15:33 GMT
- Title: A Graph-Guided Reasoning Approach for Open-ended Commonsense Question
Answering
- Authors: Zhen Han, Yue Feng, and Mingming Sun
- Abstract summary: We propose a reasoner that constructs a question-dependent open knowledge graph based on retrieved supporting facts and employs a sequential subgraph reasoning process to predict the answer.
Experiments on two OpenCSR datasets show that the proposed model achieves great performance on benchmark OpenCSR datasets.
- Score: 21.61166185452341
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recently, end-to-end trained models for multiple-choice commonsense question
answering (QA) have delivered promising results. However, such
question-answering systems cannot be directly applied in real-world scenarios
where answer candidates are not provided. Hence, a new benchmark challenge set
for open-ended commonsense reasoning (OpenCSR) has been recently released,
which contains natural science questions without any predefined choices. On the
OpenCSR challenge set, many questions require implicit multi-hop reasoning and
have a large decision space, reflecting the difficult nature of this task.
Existing work on OpenCSR sorely focuses on improving the retrieval process,
which extracts relevant factual sentences from a textual knowledge base,
leaving the important and non-trivial reasoning task outside the scope. In this
work, we extend the scope to include a reasoner that constructs a
question-dependent open knowledge graph based on retrieved supporting facts and
employs a sequential subgraph reasoning process to predict the answer. The
subgraph can be seen as a concise and compact graphical explanation of the
prediction. Experiments on two OpenCSR datasets show that the proposed model
achieves great performance on benchmark OpenCSR datasets.
Related papers
- SPARQL Generation: an analysis on fine-tuning OpenLLaMA for Question
Answering over a Life Science Knowledge Graph [0.0]
We evaluate strategies for fine-tuning the OpenLlama LLM for question answering over life science knowledge graphs.
We propose an end-to-end data augmentation approach for extending a set of existing queries over a given knowledge graph.
We also investigate the role of semantic "clues" in the queries, such as meaningful variable names and inline comments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T07:24:01Z) - Open-ended Commonsense Reasoning with Unrestricted Answer Scope [47.14397700770702]
Open-ended Commonsense Reasoning is defined as solving a commonsense question without providing 1) a short list of answer candidates and 2) a pre-defined answer scope.
In this work, we leverage pre-trained language models to iteratively retrieve reasoning paths on the external knowledge base.
The reasoning paths can help to identify the most precise answer to the commonsense question.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-18T02:45:54Z) - Open-Set Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering with Inference Paths [79.55742631375063]
The purpose of Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) is to provide a correct answer to the question with the aid of external knowledge bases.
We propose a new retriever-ranker paradigm of KB-VQA, Graph pATH rankER (GATHER for brevity)
Specifically, it contains graph constructing, pruning, and path-level ranking, which not only retrieves accurate answers but also provides inference paths that explain the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T09:12:50Z) - Multifaceted Improvements for Conversational Open-Domain Question
Answering [54.913313912927045]
We propose a framework with Multifaceted Improvements for Conversational open-domain Question Answering (MICQA)
Firstly, the proposed KL-divergence based regularization is able to lead to a better question understanding for retrieval and answer reading.
Second, the added post-ranker module can push more relevant passages to the top placements and be selected for reader with a two-aspect constrains.
Third, the well designed curriculum learning strategy effectively narrows the gap between the golden passage settings of training and inference, and encourages the reader to find true answer without the golden passage assistance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-01T07:54:27Z) - Answering Ambiguous Questions through Generative Evidence Fusion and
Round-Trip Prediction [46.38201136570501]
We present a model that aggregates and combines evidence from multiple passages to adaptively predict a single answer or a set of question-answer pairs for ambiguous questions.
Our model, named Refuel, achieves a new state-of-the-art performance on the AmbigQA dataset, and shows competitive performance on NQ-Open and TriviaQA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-26T05:48:55Z) - Differentiable Open-Ended Commonsense Reasoning [80.94997942571838]
We study open-ended commonsense reasoning (OpenCSR) using as a resource only a corpus of commonsense facts written in natural language.
As an approach to OpenCSR, we propose DrFact, an efficient Differentiable model for multi-hop Reasoning over knowledge Facts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-24T10:07:00Z) - Answering Any-hop Open-domain Questions with Iterative Document
Reranking [62.76025579681472]
We propose a unified QA framework to answer any-hop open-domain questions.
Our method consistently achieves performance comparable to or better than the state-of-the-art on both single-hop and multi-hop open-domain QA datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-16T04:31:38Z) - ClarQ: A large-scale and diverse dataset for Clarification Question
Generation [67.1162903046619]
We devise a novel bootstrapping framework that assists in the creation of a diverse, large-scale dataset of clarification questions based on postcomments extracted from stackexchange.
We quantitatively demonstrate the utility of the newly created dataset by applying it to the downstream task of question-answering.
We release this dataset in order to foster research into the field of clarification question generation with the larger goal of enhancing dialog and question answering systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T17:56:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.