Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09822v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 01:30:03 GMT
• Title: Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice
• Authors: Tanusree Sharma, Yujin Kwon, Kornrapat Pongmala, Henry Wang, Andrew Miller, Dawn Song, Yang Wang
• Abstract summary: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
• Score: 54.47385318258732
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of (pseudonymous) entities towards a shared vision (e.g., promoting sustainability), utilizing self-executing smart contracts on blockchains to support decentralized governance and decision-making. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how these DAOs actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals. Given this, we aim to unpack how (well) DAOs work in practice. We conducted an in-depth analysis of a diverse set of 10 DAOs of various categories and smart contracts, leveraging on-chain (e.g., voting results) and off-chain data (e.g., community discussions) as well as our interviews with DAO organizers/members. Specifically, we defined metrics to characterize key aspects of DAOs, such as the degrees of decentralization and autonomy. We observed CompoundDAO, AssangeDAO, Bankless, and Krausehouse having poor decentralization in voting, while decentralization has improved over time for one-person-one-vote DAOs (e.g., Proof of Humanity). Moreover, the degree of autonomy varies among DAOs, with some (e.g., Compound and Krausehouse) relying more on third parties than others. Lastly, we offer a set of design implications for future DAO systems based on our findings.

Related papers

• Hybrid-DAOs: Enhancing Governance, Scalability, and Compliance in Decentralized Systems [30.983041162098303]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are emerging governance protocols that enable decentralized community management without a central authority. They face challenges regarding scalability, governance, and compliance. Hybrid-DAOs combine the decentralized nature ofs with traditional legal frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T22:56:19Z)
• Future of Algorithmic Organization: Large-Scale Analysis of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) [45.02792904507959]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) resemble early online communities, particularly those centered around open-source projects. In just a few years, the deployment of governance tokens surged with a total of $24.5 billion and 11.1M governance token holders collectively managing decisions across over 13,000s as of 2024. We examine factors such as voting power, participation, and characteristics dictating the level of decentralization, thus, the efficiency of management structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T23:45:10Z)
• From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  This paper examines the governance of large language models (MM-LLMs) through individual and collective deliberation. We conducted a two-step study: first, interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; second, 114 individuals from the general public engaged in deliberation using Inclusive.AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Demystifying the DAO Governance Process [33.51016407136475]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is a popular governance solution for decentralized applications (dApps) to achieve decentralized governance. Despite its advantages, no single entity can arbitrarily control the dApps without approval from the majority of members.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T13:12:29Z)
• DAO Decentralization: Voting-Bloc Entropy, Bribery, and Dark DAOs [6.92620603424171]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) use smart contracts to foster communities working toward common goals. We propose a new metric called Voting-Bloc Entropy (VBE) that formalizes a broad notion of decentralization in voting on proposals. We present the first practical realization of a Dark Sapphire, a proposed mechanism for privacy-preserving corruption of identity systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T21:13:06Z)
• A Taxonomy of Decentralized Identifier Methods for Practitioners [50.76687001060655]
  A core part of the new identity management paradigm of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) is the W3C Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) standard. We propose a taxonomy of DID methods with the goal to empower practitioners to make informed decisions when selecting DID methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T13:01:40Z)
• The Hidden Shortcomings of (D)AOs -- An Empirical Study of On-Chain Governance [19.365303082741057]
  We study the on-chain governance systems of 21s and open source dataset. Thes we study are of various size and activity, and govern a wide range of protocols and services, such as decentralized exchanges, lending protocols, infrastructure projects and common goods funding. Our analysis unveils a high concentration of voting rights, a significant hidden monetary costs of on-chain governance systems, as well as a remarkably high amount of pointless governance activity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T16:08:48Z)
• Data-centric AI: Perspectives and Challenges [51.70828802140165]
  Data-centric AI (DCAI) advocates a fundamental shift from model advancements to ensuring data quality and reliability. We bring together three general missions: training data development, inference data development, and data maintenance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T05:28:59Z)
• Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent [85.15773446094576]
  We present an in-depth study towards the Byzantine resilience of decentralized learning systems. We propose UBAR, a novel algorithm to enhance decentralized learning with Byzantine Fault Tolerance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T05:11:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.