Sample-Specific Debiasing for Better Image-Text Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13181v2
• Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 15:44:27 GMT
• Title: Sample-Specific Debiasing for Better Image-Text Models
• Authors: Peiqi Wang, Yingcheng Liu, Ching-Yun Ko, William M. Wells, Seth Berkowitz, Steven Horng, Polina Golland
• Abstract summary: Self-supervised representation learning on image-text data facilitates crucial medical applications, such as image classification, visual grounding, and cross-modal retrieval. One common approach involves contrasting semantically similar (positive) and dissimilar (negative) pairs of data points. Drawing negative samples uniformly from the training data set introduces false negatives, i.e., samples that are treated as dissimilar but belong to the same class. In healthcare data, the underlying class distribution is nonuniform, implying that false negatives occur at a highly variable rate.
• Score: 6.301766237907306
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Self-supervised representation learning on image-text data facilitates crucial medical applications, such as image classification, visual grounding, and cross-modal retrieval. One common approach involves contrasting semantically similar (positive) and dissimilar (negative) pairs of data points. Drawing negative samples uniformly from the training data set introduces false negatives, i.e., samples that are treated as dissimilar but belong to the same class. In healthcare data, the underlying class distribution is nonuniform, implying that false negatives occur at a highly variable rate. To improve the quality of learned representations, we develop a novel approach that corrects for false negatives. Our method can be viewed as a variant of debiased contrastive learning that uses estimated sample-specific class probabilities. We provide theoretical analysis of the objective function and demonstrate the proposed approach on both image and paired image-text data sets. Our experiments illustrate empirical advantages of sample-specific debiasing.

Related papers

• Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness [100.36114135663836]
  We experimentally demonstrate that classes are not equal and the fairness issue is prevalent for image classification models across various datasets. Our findings reveal that models tend to exhibit greater prediction biases for classes that are more challenging to recognize. Data augmentation and representation learning algorithms improve overall performance by promoting fairness to some degree in image classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T07:54:50Z)
• Contrastive Learning with Negative Sampling Correction [52.990001829393506]
  We propose a novel contrastive learning method named Positive-Unlabeled Contrastive Learning (PUCL) PUCL treats the generated negative samples as unlabeled samples and uses information from positive samples to correct bias in contrastive loss. PUCL can be applied to general contrastive learning problems and outperforms state-of-the-art methods on various image and graph classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T11:18:18Z)
• Synthetic Hard Negative Samples for Contrastive Learning [8.776888865665024]
  This paper proposes a novel feature-level method, namely sampling synthetic hard negative samples for contrastive learning (SSCL) We generate more and harder negative samples by mixing negative samples, and then sample them by controlling the contrast of anchor sample with the other negative samples. Our proposed method improves the classification performance on different image datasets and can be readily integrated into existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T09:54:35Z)
• Bootstrapping Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation with Anatomical-aware Contrastive Distillation [10.877450596327407]
  We present ACTION, an Anatomical-aware ConTrastive dIstillatiON framework, for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. We first develop an iterative contrastive distillation algorithm by softly labeling the negatives rather than binary supervision between positive and negative pairs. We also capture more semantically similar features from the randomly chosen negative set compared to the positives to enforce the diversity of the sampled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T01:30:03Z)
• Exploring Negatives in Contrastive Learning for Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation [12.754320302262533]
  We introduce a new negative Pruning technology for Unpaired image-to-image Translation (PUT) by sparsifying and ranking the patches. The proposed algorithm is efficient, flexible and enables the model to learn essential information between corresponding patches stably.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-23T08:31:18Z)
• Modulated Contrast for Versatile Image Synthesis [60.304183493234376]
  MoNCE is a versatile metric that introduces image contrast to learn a calibrated metric for the perception of multifaceted inter-image distances. We introduce optimal transport in MoNCE to modulate the pushing force of negative samples collaboratively across multiple contrastive objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T14:03:46Z)
• Negative Evidence Matters in Interpretable Histology Image Classification [22.709305584896295]
  weakly-supervised learning methods allow CNN classifiers to jointly classify an image, and yield the regions of interest associated with the predicted class. This problem is known to be more challenging with histology images than with natural ones. We propose a simple yet efficient method based on a composite loss function that leverages information from the fully negative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-07T13:26:18Z)
• Rethinking InfoNCE: How Many Negative Samples Do You Need? [54.146208195806636]
  We study how many negative samples are optimal for InfoNCE in different scenarios via a semi-quantitative theoretical framework. We estimate the optimal negative sampling ratio using the $K$ value that maximizes the training effectiveness function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T08:38:29Z)
• An Unsupervised Sampling Approach for Image-Sentence Matching Using Document-Level Structural Information [64.66785523187845]
  We focus on the problem of unsupervised image-sentence matching. Existing research explores to utilize document-level structural information to sample positive and negative instances for model training. We propose a new sampling strategy to select additional intra-document image-sentence pairs as positive or negative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-21T05:43:29Z)
• Doubly Contrastive Deep Clustering [135.7001508427597]
  We present a novel Doubly Contrastive Deep Clustering (DCDC) framework, which constructs contrastive loss over both sample and class views. Specifically, for the sample view, we set the class distribution of the original sample and its augmented version as positive sample pairs. For the class view, we build the positive and negative pairs from the sample distribution of the class. In this way, two contrastive losses successfully constrain the clustering results of mini-batch samples in both sample and class level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-09T15:15:32Z)
• Conditional Negative Sampling for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations [19.136685699971864]
  We show that choosing difficult negatives, or those more similar to the current instance, can yield stronger representations. We introduce a family of mutual information estimators that sample negatives conditionally -- in a "ring" around each positive. We prove that these estimators lower-bound mutual information, with higher bias but lower variance than NCE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T14:17:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.