Natural language processing on customer note data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02029v1
• Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 10:36:56 GMT
• Title: Natural language processing on customer note data
• Authors: Andrew Hilditch, David Webb, Jozef Baca, Tom Armitage, Matthew Shardlow, Peter Appleby
• Abstract summary: We show that accurate sentiment can be extracted from the notes automatically and the notes can be sorted by relevance into different topics. We see that without clear separation topics can lack relevance to a business context.
• Score: 3.0828074702828623
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automatic analysis of customer data for businesses is an area that is of interest to companies. Business to business data is studied rarely in academia due to the sensitive nature of such information. Applying natural language processing can speed up the analysis of prohibitively large sets of data. This paper addresses this subject and applies sentiment analysis, topic modelling and keyword extraction to a B2B data set. We show that accurate sentiment can be extracted from the notes automatically and the notes can be sorted by relevance into different topics. We see that without clear separation topics can lack relevance to a business context.

Related papers

• The Empirical Impact of Data Sanitization on Language Models [1.1359551336076306]
  This paper empirically analyzes the effects of data sanitization across several benchmark language-modeling tasks. Our results suggest that for some tasks such as sentiment analysis or entailment, the impact of redaction is quite low, typically around 1-5%. For tasks such as comprehension Q&A there is a big drop of >25% in performance observed in redacted queries as compared to the original.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T21:22:37Z)
• NeedleBench: Evaluating LLM Retrieval and Reasoning Across Varying Information Densities [51.07379913779232]
  NeedleBench is a framework for assessing retrieval and reasoning performance in long-context tasks.<n>It embeds key data points at varying depths to rigorously test model capabilities.<n>Our experiments reveal that reasoning models like Deep-R1 and OpenAI's o3 struggle with continuous retrieval and reasoning in information-dense scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:59:06Z)
• Seed-Guided Fine-Grained Entity Typing in Science and Engineering Domains [51.02035914828596]
  We study the task of seed-guided fine-grained entity typing in science and engineering domains. We propose SEType which first enriches the weak supervision by finding more entities for each seen type from an unlabeled corpus. It then matches the enriched entities to unlabeled text to get pseudo-labeled samples and trains a textual entailment model that can make inferences for both seen and unseen types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T22:36:03Z)
• Demonstration of InsightPilot: An LLM-Empowered Automated Data Exploration System [48.62158108517576]
  We introduce InsightPilot, an automated data exploration system designed to simplify the data exploration process. InsightPilot automatically selects appropriate analysis intents, such as understanding, summarizing, and explaining. In brief, an IQuery is an abstraction and automation of data analysis operations, which mimics the approach of data analysts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-02T07:27:49Z)
• Cognitive Computing to Optimize IT Services [0.0]
  A Cognitive solution goes beyond the traditional structured data analysis by deep analyses of both structured and unstructured text. In experiments, upto 18-25% of yearly ticket volume has been reduced using the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T09:56:44Z)
• ConvoSumm: Conversation Summarization Benchmark and Improved Abstractive Summarization with Argument Mining [61.82562838486632]
  We crowdsource four new datasets on diverse online conversation forms of news comments, discussion forums, community question answering forums, and email threads. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on our datasets and analyze characteristics associated with the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:17:13Z)
• Sentiment analysis in tweets: an assessment study from classical to modern text representation models [59.107260266206445]
  Short texts published on Twitter have earned significant attention as a rich source of information. Their inherent characteristics, such as the informal, and noisy linguistic style, remain challenging to many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This study fulfils an assessment of existing language models in distinguishing the sentiment expressed in tweets by using a rich collection of 22 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T21:05:28Z)
• Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data [50.09608320112584]
  We argue that for complex language understanding tasks, all simple feature correlations are spurious. We theoretically analyze the difficulty of creating data for competency problems when human bias is taken into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T21:34:10Z)
• Text Mining for Processing Interview Data in Computational Social Science [0.6820436130599382]
  We use commercially available text analysis technology to process interview text data from a computational social science study. We find that topical clustering and terminological enrichment provide for convenient exploration and quantification of the responses. We encourage studies in social science to use text analysis, especially for exploratory open-ended studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-28T00:44:35Z)
• Data Readiness for Natural Language Processing [3.6296396308298795]
  This document concerns data readiness in the context of machine learning and Natural Language Processing. It describes how an organization may proceed to identify, make available, validate, and prepare data to facilitate automated analysis methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-04T07:53:43Z)
• Intweetive Text Summarization [1.1565654851982567]
  We propose to automatically generated summaries of Micro-Blogs conversations dealing with public figures E-Reputation. These summaries are generated using key-word queries or sample tweet and offer a focused view of the whole Micro-Blog network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-16T08:38:40Z)
• ORB: An Open Reading Benchmark for Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Reading Comprehension [53.037401638264235]
  We present an evaluation server, ORB, that reports performance on seven diverse reading comprehension datasets. The evaluation server places no restrictions on how models are trained, so it is a suitable test bed for exploring training paradigms and representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-29T07:27:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.