Cheaply Evaluating Inference Efficiency Metrics for Autoregressive Transformer APIs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02440v1
• Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 21:51:42 GMT
• Title: Cheaply Evaluating Inference Efficiency Metrics for Autoregressive Transformer APIs
• Authors: Deepak Narayanan, Keshav Santhanam, Peter Henderson, Rishi Bommasani, Tony Lee, Percy Liang
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) power many state-of-the-art systems in natural language processing. LLMs are extremely computationally expensive, even at inference time. We propose a new metric for comparing inference efficiency across models.
• Score: 66.30706841821123
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) power many state-of-the-art systems in natural language processing. However, these models are extremely computationally expensive, even at inference time, raising the natural question: when is the extra cost of deploying a larger model worth the anticipated boost in capabilities? Better understanding this tradeoff fundamentally could benefit from an inference efficiency metric that is both (i) easily comparable across models from different providers, and (ii) representative of the true cost of running queries in an isolated performance environment. Unfortunately, access to LLMs today is largely restricted to black-box text generation APIs and raw runtimes measured through this interface do not satisfy these desiderata: model providers can apply various software and hardware optimizations orthogonal to the model, and models served on shared infrastructure are susceptible to performance contention. To circumvent these problems, we propose a new metric for comparing inference efficiency across models. This metric puts models on equal footing as though they were served (i) on uniform hardware and software, and (ii) without performance contention. We call this metric the \emph{idealized runtime}, and we propose a methodology to efficiently estimate this metric for autoregressive Transformer models. We also propose cost-aware variants that incorporate the number of accelerators needed to serve the model. Using these metrics, we compare ten state-of-the-art LLMs to provide the first analysis of inference efficiency-capability tradeoffs; we make several observations from this analysis, including the fact that the superior inference runtime performance of certain APIs is often a byproduct of optimizations within the API rather than the underlying model. Our methodology also facilitates the efficient comparison of different software and hardware stacks.

Related papers

• Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models for Unit Test Generation: An Empirical Study [3.5189934649278922]
  Large language models (LLMs) like GitHub Copilot struggle with real-world tasks without fine-tuning. This paper investigates full fine-tuning and various PEFT methods, including LoRA, (IA)3, and prompt tuning. Our findings show that PEFT methods can deliver performance comparable to full fine-tuning for unit test generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T09:03:18Z)
• COrAL: Order-Agnostic Language Modeling for Efficient Iterative Refinement [80.18490952057125]
  Iterative refinement has emerged as an effective paradigm for enhancing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) on complex tasks. We propose Context-Wise Order-Agnostic Language Modeling (COrAL) to overcome these challenges. Our approach models multiple token dependencies within manageable context windows, enabling the model to perform iterative refinement internally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T23:56:19Z)
• The Impact of Hyperparameters on Large Language Model Inference Performance: An Evaluation of vLLM and HuggingFace Pipelines [6.381783966294295]
  Open-source large language models (LLMs) enable developers to create AI-based solutions while maintaining control over aspects such as privacy and compliance. We analyze the performance, particularly the throughput (tokens generated per unit of time) of 20 LLMs using two inference libraries: vLLM and HuggingFace's pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T06:56:59Z)
• Fine-Tuning with Divergent Chains of Thought Boosts Reasoning Through Self-Correction in Language Models [63.36637269634553]
  We present a novel method of further improving performance by requiring models to compare multiple reasoning chains. We find that instruction tuning on DCoT datasets boosts the performance of even smaller, and therefore more accessible, language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:01:18Z)
• Sorted LLaMA: Unlocking the Potential of Intermediate Layers of Large Language Models for Dynamic Inference [32.62084449979531]
  We extend SortedNet to generative NLP tasks by replacing Standard Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Sorted Fine-Tuning (SoFT) Our approach boosts model efficiency, eliminating the need for multiple models for various scenarios during inference. Our results show the superior performance of sub-models in comparison to Standard Fine-Tuning and SFT+ICT (Early-Exit)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T11:58:34Z)
• Energy-efficient Task Adaptation for NLP Edge Inference Leveraging Heterogeneous Memory Architectures [68.91874045918112]
  adapter-ALBERT is an efficient model optimization for maximal data reuse across different tasks. We demonstrate the advantage of mapping the model to a heterogeneous on-chip memory architecture by performing simulations on a validated NLP edge accelerator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T14:40:59Z)
• An Efficiency Study for SPLADE Models [5.725475501578801]
  In this paper, we focus on improving the efficiency of the SPLADE model. We propose several techniques including L1 regularization for queries, a separation of document/ encoders, a FLOPS-regularized middle-training, and the use of faster query encoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-08T11:42:05Z)
• SOLIS -- The MLOps journey from data acquisition to actionable insights [62.997667081978825]
  In this paper we present a unified deployment pipeline and freedom-to-operate approach that supports all requirements while using basic cross-platform tensor framework and script language engines. This approach however does not supply the needed procedures and pipelines for the actual deployment of machine learning capabilities in real production grade systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T14:45:37Z)
• Efficient Nearest Neighbor Language Models [114.40866461741795]
  Non-parametric neural language models (NLMs) learn predictive distributions of text utilizing an external datastore. We show how to achieve up to a 6x speed-up in inference speed while retaining comparable performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T12:32:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.