Optimization- and AI-based approaches to academic quality quantification for transparent academic recruitment: part 1-model development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05460v1
• Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 13:17:04 GMT
• Title: Optimization- and AI-based approaches to academic quality quantification for transparent academic recruitment: part 1-model development
• Authors: Ercan atam
• Abstract summary: We develop two computational frameworks which can be used to construct a decision-support tool. The output of both models is a single index called Academic Quality Index (AQI) which is a measure of the overall academic quality. The data of academics from first-class and average-class world universities, based on Times Higher Education World University Rankings and QS World University Rankings, are assumed as the reference data for tuning model parameters.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: For fair academic recruitment at universities and research institutions, determination of the right measure based on globally accepted academic quality features is a highly delicate, challenging, but quite important problem to be addressed. In a series of two papers, we consider the modeling part for academic quality quantification in the first paper, in this paper, and the case studies part in the second paper. For academic quality quantification modeling, we develop two computational frameworks which can be used to construct a decision-support tool: (i) an optimization-based framework and (ii) a Siamese network (a type of artificial neural network)-based framework. The output of both models is a single index called Academic Quality Index (AQI) which is a measure of the overall academic quality. The data of academics from first-class and average-class world universities, based on Times Higher Education World University Rankings and QS World University Rankings, are assumed as the reference data for tuning model parameters.

Related papers

• Q-Ground: Image Quality Grounding with Large Multi-modality Models [61.72022069880346]
  We introduce Q-Ground, the first framework aimed at tackling fine-scale visual quality grounding. Q-Ground combines large multi-modality models with detailed visual quality analysis. Central to our contribution is the introduction of the QGround-100K dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T06:42:46Z)
• G-Refine: A General Quality Refiner for Text-to-Image Generation [74.16137826891827]
  We introduce G-Refine, a general image quality refiner designed to enhance low-quality images without compromising integrity of high-quality ones. The model is composed of three interconnected modules: a perception quality indicator, an alignment quality indicator, and a general quality enhancement module. Extensive experimentation reveals that AIGIs after G-Refine outperform in 10+ quality metrics across 4 databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T00:54:38Z)
• PCQA: A Strong Baseline for AIGC Quality Assessment Based on Prompt Condition [4.125007507808684]
  This study proposes an effective AIGC quality assessment (QA) framework. First, we propose a hybrid prompt encoding method based on a dual-source CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-Training) text encoder. Second, we propose an ensemble-based feature mixer module to effectively blend the adapted prompt and vision features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-20T07:05:45Z)
• Model-Based Data-Centric AI: Bridging the Divide Between Academic Ideals and Industrial Pragmatism [8.938344250520851]
  We argue that while Data-Centric AI focuses on the primacy of high-quality data for model performance, Model-Agnostic AI prioritizes algorithmic flexibility. This distinction reveals that academic standards for data quality frequently do not meet the rigorous demands of industrial applications. We propose a novel paradigm: Model-Based Data-Centric AI, which aims to reconcile these differences by integrating model considerations into data optimization processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T08:29:15Z)
• AcademicGPT: Empowering Academic Research [19.175478235030234]
  AcademicGPT is a continual training model derived from LLaMA2-70B. Our training corpus mainly consists of academic papers, thesis, content from some academic domain, high-quality Chinese data and others. Building upon AcademicGPT's foundation model, we also developed several applications catered to the academic area, including General Academic Question Answering, AI-assisted Paper Reading, Paper Review, and AI-assisted Title and Abstract Generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T03:17:14Z)
• Rethinking Word-Level Auto-Completion in Computer-Aided Translation [76.34184928621477]
  Word-Level Auto-Completion (WLAC) plays a crucial role in Computer-Assisted Translation. It aims at providing word-level auto-completion suggestions for human translators. We introduce a measurable criterion to answer this question and discover that existing WLAC models often fail to meet this criterion. We propose an effective approach to enhance WLAC performance by promoting adherence to the criterion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T03:11:46Z)
• Evaluating the Generation Capabilities of Large Chinese Language Models [27.598864484231477]
  This paper unveils CG-Eval, the first-ever comprehensive and automated evaluation framework. It assesses the generative capabilities of large Chinese language models across a spectrum of academic disciplines. Gscore automates the quality measurement of a model's text generation against reference standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T09:22:56Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Image Quality Assessment in the Modern Age [53.19271326110551]
  This tutorial provides the audience with the basic theories, methodologies, and current progresses of image quality assessment (IQA) We will first revisit several subjective quality assessment methodologies, with emphasis on how to properly select visual stimuli. Both hand-engineered and (deep) learning-based methods will be covered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T02:38:46Z)
• Improved Bilevel Model: Fast and Optimal Algorithm with Theoretical Guarantee [110.16183719936629]
  We propose an improved bilevel model which converges faster and better compared to the current formulation. The empirical results show that our model outperforms the current bilevel model with a great margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T20:52:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.