How is the speed of code review affected by activity, usage and code quality?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05770v1
• Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 21:11:17 GMT
• Title: How is the speed of code review affected by activity, usage and code quality?
• Authors: William Brown (University of Aberdeen BSc student)
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates how the speed of code review is affected by the code quality activity and usage in the context of extensions. The median time to merge is compared against several other variables which are collected using a variety of manual methods and APIs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates how the speed of code review is affected by the code quality, activity and usage in the context of MediaWiki extensions. The median time to merge is compared against several other variables which are collected using a variety of manual methods and APIs. The results are graphed where possible and statistical analysis is used to determine the significance of the results. The paper finds that the number of reviewers voting on code and whether the extension has a steward affects the median time to merge. Finally, conclusions are drawn and further research topics are recommended.

Related papers

• Analytical and Empirical Study of Herding Effects in Recommendation Systems [72.6693986712978]
  We study how to manage product ratings via rating aggregation rules and shortlisted representative reviews. We show that proper recency aware rating aggregation rules can improve the speed of convergence in Amazon and TripAdvisor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T14:29:23Z)
• Does Code Review Speed Matter for Practitioners? [0.0]
  Increasing code velocity is a common goal for a variety of software projects. We conducted a survey to study the code velocity-related beliefs and practices in place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T19:22:23Z)
• Comparative Study and Framework for Automated Summariser Evaluation: LangChain and Hybrid Algorithms [0.0]
  The research is concentrated on the user's understanding of a given topic. The focus is on summarizing a PDF document and gauging a user's understanding of its content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T12:14:43Z)
• Augmenting Diffs With Runtime Information [53.22981451758425]
  Collector-Sahab is a tool that augments code diffs with runtime difference information. We run Collector-Sahab on 584 code diffs for Defects4J bugs and find it successfully augments the code diff for 95% (555/584) of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T16:33:51Z)
• Integrating Rankings into Quantized Scores in Peer Review [61.27794774537103]
  In peer review, reviewers are usually asked to provide scores for the papers. To mitigate this issue, conferences have started to ask reviewers to additionally provide a ranking of the papers they have reviewed. There are no standard procedure for using this ranking information and Area Chairs may use it in different ways. We take a principled approach to integrate the ranking information into the scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T19:39:13Z)
• Neural Code Summarization: How Far Are We? [30.324396716447602]
  Deep learning techniques have been exploited to automatically generate summaries for given code snippets. In this paper, we conduct a systematic and in-depth analysis of five state-of-the-art neural source code summarization models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T04:33:59Z)
• Content-Based Detection of Temporal Metadata Manipulation [91.34308819261905]
  We propose an end-to-end approach to verify whether the purported time of capture of an image is consistent with its content and geographic location. The central idea is the use of supervised consistency verification, in which we predict the probability that the image content, capture time, and geographical location are consistent. Our approach improves upon previous work on a large benchmark dataset, increasing the classification accuracy from 59.03% to 81.07%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T13:16:19Z)
• The Influence of Domain-Based Preprocessing on Subject-Specific Clustering [55.41644538483948]
  The sudden change of moving the majority of teaching online at Universities has caused an increased amount of workload for academics. One way to deal with this problem is to cluster these questions depending on their topic. In this paper, we explore the realms of tagging data sets, focusing on identifying code excerpts and providing empirical results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T17:47:19Z)
• Surprise: Result List Truncation via Extreme Value Theory [92.5817701697342]
  We propose a statistical method that produces interpretable and calibrated relevance scores at query time using nothing more than the ranked scores. We demonstrate its effectiveness on the result list truncation task across image, text, and IR datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T19:15:50Z)
• Sentiment Analysis Using Averaged Weighted Word Vector Features [1.2691047660244332]
  We develop two methods that combine different types of word vectors to learn and estimate polarity of reviews. We apply the methods to several datasets from different domains that are used as standard benchmarks for sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T16:30:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.