C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08322v3
• Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 13:24:16 GMT
• Title: C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models
• Authors: Yuzhen Huang, Yuzhuo Bai, Zhihao Zhu, Junlei Zhang, Jinghan Zhang, Tangjun Su, Junteng Liu, Chuancheng Lv, Yikai Zhang, Jiayi Lei, Yao Fu, Maosong Sun, Junxian He
• Abstract summary: We present C-Eval, the first comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite designed to assess advanced knowledge and reasoning abilities of foundation models in a Chinese context. C-Eval comprises multiple-choice questions across four difficulty levels: middle school, high school, college, and professional. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the most advanced LLMs on C-Eval, including both English- and Chinese-oriented models.
• Score: 58.42279750824907
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: New NLP benchmarks are urgently needed to align with the rapid development of large language models (LLMs). We present C-Eval, the first comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite designed to assess advanced knowledge and reasoning abilities of foundation models in a Chinese context. C-Eval comprises multiple-choice questions across four difficulty levels: middle school, high school, college, and professional. The questions span 52 diverse disciplines, ranging from humanities to science and engineering. C-Eval is accompanied by C-Eval Hard, a subset of very challenging subjects in C-Eval that requires advanced reasoning abilities to solve. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the most advanced LLMs on C-Eval, including both English- and Chinese-oriented models. Results indicate that only GPT-4 could achieve an average accuracy of over 60%, suggesting that there is still significant room for improvement for current LLMs. We anticipate C-Eval will help analyze important strengths and shortcomings of foundation models, and foster their development and growth for Chinese users.

Related papers

• CJEval: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models Using Chinese Junior High School Exam Data [31.324617466692754]
  CJEval is a benchmark based on Chinese Junior High School Exam Evaluations. It consists of 26,136 samples across four application-level educational tasks covering ten subjects. By utilizing this benchmark, we assessed LLMs' potential applications and conducted a comprehensive analysis of their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T16:00:28Z)
• ICLEval: Evaluating In-Context Learning Ability of Large Language Models [68.7494310749199]
  In-Context Learning (ICL) is a critical capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) as it empowers them to comprehend and reason across interconnected inputs. Existing evaluation frameworks primarily focus on language abilities and knowledge, often overlooking the assessment of ICL ability. We introduce the ICLEval benchmark to evaluate the ICL abilities of LLMs, which encompasses two key sub-abilities: exact copying and rule learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T08:06:10Z)
• MultiPragEval: Multilingual Pragmatic Evaluation of Large Language Models [0.5822010906632046]
  This study introduces MultiPragEval, the first pragmatic evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) Comprising 1200 question units categorized according to Grice's Cooperative Principle, MultiPragEval enables an in-depth assessment of LLMs' contextual awareness and their ability to infer implied meanings. Our findings demonstrate that Claude3-Opus significantly outperforms other models in all tested languages, establishing a state-of-the-art in the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T21:46:03Z)
• FoundaBench: Evaluating Chinese Fundamental Knowledge Capabilities of Large Language Models [64.11333762954283]
  This paper introduces FoundaBench, a pioneering benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the fundamental knowledge capabilities of Chinese LLMs. We present an extensive evaluation of 12 state-of-the-art LLMs using FoundaBench, employing both traditional assessment methods and our CircularEval protocol to mitigate potential biases in model responses. Our results highlight the superior performance of models pre-trained on Chinese corpora, and reveal a significant disparity between models' reasoning and memory recall capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T01:49:07Z)
• E-EVAL: A Comprehensive Chinese K-12 Education Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [44.74622336775077]
  We introduce the E-EVAL, the first comprehensive evaluation benchmark specifically designed for the Chinese K-12 education field. The E-EVAL consists of 4,351 multiple-choice questions at the primary, middle, and high school levels across a wide range of subjects, including Chinese, English, Politics, History, Ethics, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Geography. Findings show that Chinese-dominant models perform well compared to English-dominant models, with many scoring even above the GPT 4.0. However, almost all models perform poorly in complex subjects such as mathematics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T07:34:37Z)
• LLaMA Beyond English: An Empirical Study on Language Capability Transfer [49.298360366468934]
  We focus on how to effectively transfer the capabilities of language generation and following instructions to a non-English language. We analyze the impact of key factors such as vocabulary extension, further pretraining, and instruction tuning on transfer. We employ four widely used standardized testing benchmarks: C-Eval, MMLU, AGI-Eval, and GAOKAO-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T06:29:02Z)
• CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese [133.70911295934746]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive Chinese benchmark that covers various subjects, including natural science, social sciences, engineering, and humanities. CMMLU fills the gap in evaluating the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of large language models within the Chinese context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T15:49:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.