How Spurious Features Are Memorized: Precise Analysis for Random and NTK Features

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.12100v3
• Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 14:10:20 GMT
• Title: How Spurious Features Are Memorized: Precise Analysis for Random and NTK Features
• Authors: Simone Bombari, Marco Mondelli,
• Abstract summary: We consider spurious features that are uncorrelated with the learning task. We provide a precise characterization of how they are memorized via two separate terms. We prove that the memorization of spurious features weakens as the generalization capability increases.
• Score: 19.261178173399784
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning models are known to overfit and memorize spurious features in the training dataset. While numerous empirical studies have aimed at understanding this phenomenon, a rigorous theoretical framework to quantify it is still missing. In this paper, we consider spurious features that are uncorrelated with the learning task, and we provide a precise characterization of how they are memorized via two separate terms: (i) the stability of the model with respect to individual training samples, and (ii) the feature alignment between the spurious feature and the full sample. While the first term is well established in learning theory and it is connected to the generalization error in classical work, the second one is, to the best of our knowledge, novel. Our key technical result gives a precise characterization of the feature alignment for the two prototypical settings of random features (RF) and neural tangent kernel (NTK) regression. We prove that the memorization of spurious features weakens as the generalization capability increases and, through the analysis of the feature alignment, we unveil the role of the model and of its activation function. Numerical experiments show the predictive power of our theory on standard datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10).

Related papers

• Complexity Matters: Dynamics of Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlations [13.119576365743624]
  We study the dynamics of feature learning under spurious correlations. We demonstrate that our findings justify the success of retraining the last layer to remove spurious correlation. We also identify limitations of popular debiasing algorithms that exploit early learning of spurious features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T23:54:00Z)
• On the Foundations of Shortcut Learning [20.53986437152018]
  We study how predictivity and availability interact to shape models' feature use. We find that linear models are relatively unbiased, but introducing a single hidden layer with ReLU or Tanh units yields a bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T22:54:05Z)
• On the Joint Interaction of Models, Data, and Features [82.60073661644435]
  We introduce a new tool, the interaction tensor, for empirically analyzing the interaction between data and model through features. Based on these observations, we propose a conceptual framework for feature learning. Under this framework, the expected accuracy for a single hypothesis and agreement for a pair of hypotheses can both be derived in closed-form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T21:35:26Z)
• Feature Chirality in Deep Learning Models [7.402957682300806]
  We study feature chirality innovatively, which shows how the statistics of deep learning models' feature data are changed by training. Our work shows that feature chirality implies model evaluation, interpretability of the model, and model parameters optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T07:57:38Z)
• Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descent [71.91871020059857]
  We study the phenomenon of "double descent" of the generalization error. We find that double descent can be attributed to distinct features being learned at different scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T18:17:08Z)
• Towards Open-World Feature Extrapolation: An Inductive Graph Learning Approach [80.8446673089281]
  We propose a new learning paradigm with graph representation and learning. Our framework contains two modules: 1) a backbone network (e.g., feedforward neural nets) as a lower model takes features as input and outputs predicted labels; 2) a graph neural network as an upper model learns to extrapolate embeddings for new features via message passing over a feature-data graph built from observed data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T09:02:45Z)
• More data or more parameters? Investigating the effect of data structure on generalization [17.249712222764085]
  Properties of data impact the test error as a function of the number of training examples and number of training parameters. We show that noise in the labels and strong anisotropy of the input data play similar roles on the test error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-09T16:08:41Z)
• Don't Just Blame Over-parametrization for Over-confidence: Theoretical Analysis of Calibration in Binary Classification [58.03725169462616]
  We show theoretically that over-parametrization is not the only reason for over-confidence. We prove that logistic regression is inherently over-confident, in the realizable, under-parametrized setting. Perhaps surprisingly, we also show that over-confidence is not always the case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T21:38:09Z)
• Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networks [97.02382916372594]
  Gradient Starvation arises when cross-entropy loss is minimized by capturing only a subset of features relevant for the task. This work provides a theoretical explanation for the emergence of such feature imbalance in neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T18:52:08Z)
• Can Temporal-Difference and Q-Learning Learn Representation? A Mean-Field Theory [110.99247009159726]
  Temporal-difference and Q-learning play a key role in deep reinforcement learning, where they are empowered by expressive nonlinear function approximators such as neural networks. In particular, temporal-difference learning converges when the function approximator is linear in a feature representation, which is fixed throughout learning, and possibly diverges otherwise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T17:25:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.