Unraveling ChatGPT: A Critical Analysis of AI-Generated Goal-Oriented Dialogues and Annotations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14556v1
• Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 22:31:01 GMT
• Title: Unraveling ChatGPT: A Critical Analysis of AI-Generated Goal-Oriented Dialogues and Annotations
• Authors: Tiziano Labruna, Sofia Brenna, Andrea Zaninello, Bernardo Magnini
• Abstract summary: Large pre-trained language models have exhibited unprecedented capabilities in producing high-quality text via prompting. In this paper, we explore the potential of these models to generate and annotate goal-oriented dialogues, and conduct an in-depth analysis to evaluate their quality. Based on extensive human-based evaluations, we demonstrate that the quality of generated dialogues and annotations is on par with those generated by humans.
• Score: 1.7969777786551426
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large pre-trained language models have exhibited unprecedented capabilities in producing high-quality text via prompting techniques. This fact introduces new possibilities for data collection and annotation, particularly in situations where such data is scarce, complex to gather, expensive, or even sensitive. In this paper, we explore the potential of these models to generate and annotate goal-oriented dialogues, and conduct an in-depth analysis to evaluate their quality. Our experiments employ ChatGPT, and encompass three categories of goal-oriented dialogues (task-oriented, collaborative, and explanatory), two generation modes (interactive and one-shot), and two languages (English and Italian). Based on extensive human-based evaluations, we demonstrate that the quality of generated dialogues and annotations is on par with those generated by humans.

Related papers

• A Comparative Analysis of Conversational Large Language Models in Knowledge-Based Text Generation [5.661396828160973]
  We conduct an empirical analysis of conversational large language models in generating natural language text from semantic triples. We compare four large language models of varying sizes with different prompting techniques. Our findings show that the capabilities of large language models in triple verbalization can be significantly improved through few-shot prompting, post-processing, and efficient fine-tuning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T15:26:39Z)
• Dialogue Quality and Emotion Annotations for Customer Support Conversations [7.218791626731783]
  This paper presents a holistic annotation approach for emotion and conversational quality in the context of bilingual customer support conversations. It provides a unique and valuable resource for the development of text classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T10:56:14Z)
• Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension from a Topic-aware Perspective [70.37126956655985]
  This paper proposes to model multi-turn dialogues from a topic-aware perspective. We use a dialogue segmentation algorithm to split a dialogue passage into topic-concentrated fragments in an unsupervised way. We also present a novel model, Topic-Aware Dual-Attention Matching (TADAM) Network, which takes topic segments as processing elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T11:03:55Z)
• Neural Conversation Models and How to Rein Them in: A Survey of Failures and Fixes [17.489075240435348]
  Recent conditional language models are able to continue any kind of text source in an often seemingly fluent way. From a linguistic perspective, contributing to a conversation is high. Recent approaches try to tame the underlying language models at various intervention points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T12:07:45Z)
• Disco-Bench: A Discourse-Aware Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelling [70.23876429382969]
  We propose a benchmark that can evaluate intra-sentence discourse properties across a diverse set of NLP tasks. Disco-Bench consists of 9 document-level testsets in the literature domain, which contain rich discourse phenomena. For linguistic analysis, we also design a diagnostic test suite that can examine whether the target models learn discourse knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T15:18:25Z)
• Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluation [82.31575622685902]
  A document summary's quality can be assessed by human annotators on various criteria, both objective ones like grammar and correctness, and subjective ones like informativeness, succinctness, and appeal. Most of the automatic evaluation methods like BLUE/ROUGE may be not able to adequately capture the above dimensions. We propose a new evaluation framework based on LLMs, which provides a comprehensive evaluation framework by comparing generated text and reference text from both objective and subjective aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T10:40:59Z)
• A Benchmark for Understanding and Generating Dialogue between Characters in Stories [75.29466820496913]
  We present the first study to explore whether machines can understand and generate dialogue in stories. We propose two new tasks including Masked Dialogue Generation and Dialogue Speaker Recognition. We show the difficulty of the proposed tasks by testing existing models with automatic and manual evaluation on DialStory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-18T10:19:04Z)
• Cross-Lingual Dialogue Dataset Creation via Outline-Based Generation [70.81596088969378]
  Cross-lingual Outline-based Dialogue dataset (termed COD) enables natural language understanding. COD enables dialogue state tracking, and end-to-end dialogue modelling and evaluation in 4 diverse languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T18:11:21Z)
• Language Model as an Annotator: Exploring DialoGPT for Dialogue Summarization [29.887562761942114]
  We show how DialoGPT, a pre-trained model for conversational response generation, can be developed as an unsupervised dialogue annotator. We apply DialoGPT to label three types of features on two dialogue summarization datasets, SAMSum and AMI, and employ pre-trained and non pre-trained models as our summarizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-26T13:50:13Z)
• Robustness Testing of Language Understanding in Dialog Systems [33.30143655553583]
  We conduct comprehensive evaluation and analysis with respect to the robustness of natural language understanding models. We introduce three important aspects related to language understanding in real-world dialog systems, namely, language variety, speech characteristics, and noise perturbation. We propose a model-agnostic toolkit LAUG to approximate natural perturbation for testing the robustness issues in dialog systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T18:18:47Z)
• Video-Grounded Dialogues with Pretrained Generation Language Models [88.15419265622748]
  We leverage the power of pre-trained language models for improving video-grounded dialogue. We propose a framework by formulating sequence-to-grounded dialogue tasks as a sequence-to-grounded task. Our framework allows fine-tuning language models to capture dependencies across multiple modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T08:24:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.