Efficient Detection of LLM-generated Texts with a Bayesian Surrogate Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16617v3
• Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:05:48 GMT
• Title: Efficient Detection of LLM-generated Texts with a Bayesian Surrogate Model
• Authors: Yibo Miao, Hongcheng Gao, Hao Zhang, Zhijie Deng,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new method to detect machine-generated text, especially from large language models (LLMs) We use a Bayesian surrogate model, which allows us to select typical samples based on Bayesian uncertainty and interpolate scores from typical samples to other samples, to improve query efficiency. Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches under a low query budget.
• Score: 14.98695074168234
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The detection of machine-generated text, especially from large language models (LLMs), is crucial in preventing serious social problems resulting from their misuse. Some methods train dedicated detectors on specific datasets but fall short in generalizing to unseen test data, while other zero-shot ones often yield suboptimal performance. Although the recent DetectGPT has shown promising detection performance, it suffers from significant inefficiency issues, as detecting a single candidate requires querying the source LLM with hundreds of its perturbations. This paper aims to bridge this gap. Concretely, we propose to incorporate a Bayesian surrogate model, which allows us to select typical samples based on Bayesian uncertainty and interpolate scores from typical samples to other samples, to improve query efficiency. Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches under a low query budget. Notably, when detecting the text generated by LLaMA family models, our method with just 2 or 3 queries can outperform DetectGPT with 200 queries.

Related papers

• On Speeding Up Language Model Evaluation [48.51924035873411]
  Development of prompt-based methods with Large Language Models (LLMs) requires making numerous decisions. We propose a novel method to address this challenge. We show that it can identify the top-performing method using only 5-15% of the typically needed resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:48:42Z)
• LLMs as Factual Reasoners: Insights from Existing Benchmarks and Beyond [135.8013388183257]
  We propose a new protocol for inconsistency detection benchmark creation and implement it in a 10-domain benchmark called SummEdits. Most LLMs struggle on SummEdits, with performance close to random chance. The best-performing model, GPT-4, is still 8% below estimated human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T21:50:06Z)
• Hard Nominal Example-aware Template Mutual Matching for Industrial Anomaly Detection [74.9262846410559]
  textbfHard Nominal textbfExample-aware textbfTemplate textbfMutual textbfMatching (HETMM) textitHETMM aims to construct a robust prototype-based decision boundary, which can precisely distinguish between hard-nominal examples and anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T17:54:56Z)
• MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection [54.81446366272403]
  This paper proposes the first benchmark framework for MGT detection against powerful large language models (LLMs) We show that a larger number of words in general leads to better performance and most detection methods can achieve similar performance with much fewer training samples. Our findings indicate that the model-based detection methods still perform well in the text attribution task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-26T21:12:36Z)
• DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvature [143.5381108333212]
  We show that text sampled from an large language model tends to occupy negative curvature regions of the model's log probability function. We then define a new curvature-based criterion for judging if a passage is generated from a given LLM. We find DetectGPT is more discriminative than existing zero-shot methods for model sample detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T18:44:06Z)
• Unsupervised Model Selection for Time-series Anomaly Detection [7.8027110514393785]
  We identify three classes of surrogate (unsupervised) metrics, namely, prediction error, model centrality, and performance on injected synthetic anomalies. We formulate metric combination with multiple imperfect surrogate metrics as a robust rank aggregation problem. Large-scale experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that our proposed unsupervised approach is as effective as selecting the most accurate model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T16:49:30Z)
• Pareto Optimization for Active Learning under Out-of-Distribution Data Scenarios [79.02009938011447]
  We propose a sampling scheme, which selects optimal subsets of unlabeled samples with fixed batch size from the unlabeled data pool. Experimental results show its effectiveness on both classical Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T04:11:44Z)
• A Systematic Evaluation of Object Detection Networks for Scientific Plots [17.882932963813985]
  We train and compare the accuracy of various SOTA object detection networks on the PlotQA dataset. At the standard IOU setting of 0.5, most networks perform well with mAP scores greater than 80% in detecting the relatively simple objects in plots. However, the performance drops drastically when evaluated at a stricter IOU of 0.9 with the best model giving a mAP of 35.70%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T05:30:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.