How Powerful are Decoder-Only Transformer Neural Models?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17026v3
• Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 18:04:58 GMT
• Title: How Powerful are Decoder-Only Transformer Neural Models?
• Authors: Jesse Roberts
• Abstract summary: This is the first work to address the Turing completeness of the underlying technology employed in GPT-x. We show that the sparsity/compressibility of the word embedding is an important consideration for Turing completeness to hold.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In this article we prove that the general transformer neural model undergirding modern large language models (LLMs) is Turing complete under reasonable assumptions. This is the first work to directly address the Turing completeness of the underlying technology employed in GPT-x as past work has focused on the more expressive, full auto-encoder transformer architecture. From this theoretical analysis, we show that the sparsity/compressibility of the word embedding is an important consideration for Turing completeness to hold. We also show that Transformers are are a variant of B machines studied by Hao Wang.

Related papers

• Simulating Weighted Automata over Sequences and Trees with Transformers [5.078561931628571]
  We show that transformers can simulate weighted finite automata (WFAs), a class of models which subsumes DFAs, as well as weighted tree automata (WTA) We prove these claims formally and provide upper bounds on the sizes of the transformer models needed as a function of the number of states the target automata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T21:54:34Z)
• Transformers are Expressive, But Are They Expressive Enough for Regression? [38.369337945109855]
  We show that Transformers struggle to reliably approximate smooth functions, relying on piecewise constant approximations with sizable intervals. By shedding light on these challenges, we advocate a refined understanding of Transformers' capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:12:53Z)
• Repeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying [53.47717661441142]
  We show that while generalized state space models are promising in terms of inference-time efficiency, they are limited compared to transformer models on tasks that require copying from the input context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T21:44:11Z)
• Introduction to Transformers: an NLP Perspective [59.0241868728732]
  We introduce basic concepts of Transformers and present key techniques that form the recent advances of these models. This includes a description of the standard Transformer architecture, a series of model refinements, and common applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T13:51:04Z)
• On the Convergence of Encoder-only Shallow Transformers [62.639819460956176]
  We build the global convergence theory of encoder-only shallow Transformers under a realistic setting. Our results can pave the way for a better understanding of modern Transformers, particularly on training dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T20:03:05Z)
• An Introduction to Transformers [23.915718146956355]
  transformer is a neural network component that can be used to learn useful sequences or sets of data-points. In this note we aim for a mathematically precise, intuitive, and clean description of the transformer architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T14:54:19Z)
• Your Transformer May Not be as Powerful as You Expect [88.11364619182773]
  We mathematically analyze the power of RPE-based Transformers regarding whether the model is capable of approximating any continuous sequence-to-sequence functions. We present a negative result by showing there exist continuous sequence-to-sequence functions that RPE-based Transformers cannot approximate no matter how deep and wide the neural network is. We develop a novel attention module, called Universal RPE-based (URPE) Attention, which satisfies the conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T14:51:30Z)
• On the Power of Saturated Transformers: A View from Circuit Complexity [87.20342701232869]
  We show that saturated transformers transcend the limitations of hard-attention transformers. The jump from hard to saturated attention can be understood as increasing the transformer's effective circuit depth by a factor of $O(log n)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T17:09:47Z)
• Thinking Like Transformers [64.96770952820691]
  We propose a computational model for the transformer-encoder in the form of a programming language. We show how RASP can be used to program solutions to tasks that could conceivably be learned by a Transformer. We provide RASP programs for histograms, sorting, and Dyck-languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-13T13:04:46Z)
• On the Computational Power of Transformers and its Implications in Sequence Modeling [10.497742214344855]
  In particular, the roles of various components in Transformers such as positional encodings, attention heads, residual connections, and feedforward networks, are not clear. We provide an alternate and simpler proof to show that vanilla Transformers are Turing-complete. We further analyze the necessity of each component for the Turing-completeness of the network; interestingly, we find that a particular type of residual connection is necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T16:27:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.