Not All Neuro-Symbolic Concepts Are Created Equal: Analysis and Mitigation of Reasoning Shortcuts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19951v2
• Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:20:34 GMT
• Title: Not All Neuro-Symbolic Concepts Are Created Equal: Analysis and Mitigation of Reasoning Shortcuts
• Authors: Emanuele Marconato, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari, Andrea Passerini
• Abstract summary: Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictive models hold the promise of improved compliance with given constraints. They allow to infer labels that are consistent with some prior knowledge by reasoning over high-level concepts extracted from sub-symbolic inputs. It was recently shown that NeSy predictors are affected by reasoning shortcuts: they can attain high accuracy but by leveraging concepts with unintended semantics, thus coming short of their promised advantages.
• Score: 24.390922632057627
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictive models hold the promise of improved compliance with given constraints, systematic generalization, and interpretability, as they allow to infer labels that are consistent with some prior knowledge by reasoning over high-level concepts extracted from sub-symbolic inputs. It was recently shown that NeSy predictors are affected by reasoning shortcuts: they can attain high accuracy but by leveraging concepts with unintended semantics, thus coming short of their promised advantages. Yet, a systematic characterization of reasoning shortcuts and of potential mitigation strategies is missing. This work fills this gap by characterizing them as unintended optima of the learning objective and identifying four key conditions behind their occurrence. Based on this, we derive several natural mitigation strategies, and analyze their efficacy both theoretically and empirically. Our analysis shows reasoning shortcuts are difficult to deal with, casting doubts on the trustworthiness and interpretability of existing NeSy solutions.

Related papers

• On the Independence Assumption in Neurosymbolic Learning [14.447011414006719]
  State-of-the-art neurosymbolic learning systems use probabilistic reasoning to guide neural networks towards predictions that conform to logical constraints over symbols. Many such systems assume that the probabilities of the considered symbols are conditionally independent given the input to simplify learning and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T13:09:48Z)
• BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcuts [21.743306538494043]
  Reasoning Shortcuts can affect Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictors. They learn concepts consistent with symbolic knowledge by exploiting unintended semantics. We propose to ensure NeSy models are aware of the semantic ambiguity of the concepts they learn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T15:54:36Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning Shortcuts: Mitigation Strategies and their Limitations [23.7625973884849]
  Neuro-symbolic predictors learn a mapping from sub-symbolic inputs to higher-level concepts and then carry out (probabilistic) logical inference on this intermediate representation. This setup is often believed to provide interpretability benefits in that - by virtue of complying with the knowledge - the learned concepts can be better understood by human stakeholders. However, it was recently shown that this setup is affected by reasoning shortcuts whereby predictions attain high accuracy by leveraging concepts with unintended semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T14:03:23Z)
• Semantic Strengthening of Neuro-Symbolic Learning [85.6195120593625]
  Neuro-symbolic approaches typically resort to fuzzy approximations of a probabilistic objective. We show how to compute this efficiently for tractable circuits. We test our approach on three tasks: predicting a minimum-cost path in Warcraft, predicting a minimum-cost perfect matching, and solving Sudoku puzzles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T00:04:22Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Continual Learning: Knowledge, Reasoning Shortcuts and Concept Rehearsal [26.999987105646966]
  We introduce Neuro-Symbolic Continual Learning, where a model has to solve a sequence of neuro-symbolic tasks. Our key observation is that neuro-symbolic tasks, although different, often share concepts whose semantics remains stable over time. We show that leveraging prior knowledge by combining neuro-symbolic architectures with continual strategies does help avoid catastrophic forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T17:24:43Z)
• NeuroExplainer: Fine-Grained Attention Decoding to Uncover Cortical Development Patterns of Preterm Infants [73.85768093666582]
  We propose an explainable geometric deep network dubbed NeuroExplainer. NeuroExplainer is used to uncover altered infant cortical development patterns associated with preterm birth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T12:48:12Z)
• Logical Satisfiability of Counterfactuals for Faithful Explanations in NLI [60.142926537264714]
  We introduce the methodology of Faithfulness-through-Counterfactuals. It generates a counterfactual hypothesis based on the logical predicates expressed in the explanation. It then evaluates if the model's prediction on the counterfactual is consistent with that expressed logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T03:40:59Z)
• The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression [72.30888739450343]
  A new approach with uncertainty-aware regression-based neural networks (NNs) shows promise over traditional deterministic methods and typical Bayesian NNs. We detail the theoretical shortcomings and analyze the performance on synthetic and real-world data sets, showing that Deep Evidential Regression is a quantification rather than an exact uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T10:10:32Z)
• Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networks [97.02382916372594]
  Gradient Starvation arises when cross-entropy loss is minimized by capturing only a subset of features relevant for the task. This work provides a theoretical explanation for the emergence of such feature imbalance in neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T18:52:08Z)
• Towards falsifiable interpretability research [7.360807642941714]
  We argue that interpretability research suffers from an over-reliance on intuition-based approaches. We examine two popular classes of interpretability methods-saliency and single-neuron-based approaches. We propose a strategy to address these impediments in the form of a framework for strongly falsifiable interpretability research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T22:03:41Z)
• Logical Neural Networks [51.46602187496816]
  We propose a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning) Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly intepretable disentangled representation. Inference is omni rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T16:55:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.