Toward Textual Internet Immunity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02875v1
• Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 13:47:30 GMT
• Title: Toward Textual Internet Immunity
• Authors: Gregory M. Dickinson
• Abstract summary: Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, online entities are immune from lawsuits related to content authored by third parties. This Essay discusses how courts' zealous enforcement of the early internet's free-information ethos gave birth to an expansive immunity doctrine. It explores what a narrower, text-focused doctrine might mean for the tech industry.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Internet immunity doctrine is broken. Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, online entities are absolutely immune from lawsuits related to content authored by third parties. The law has been essential to the internet's development over the last twenty years, but it has not kept pace with the times and is now deeply flawed. Democrats demand accountability for online misinformation. Republicans decry politically motivated censorship. And Congress, President Biden, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Communications Commission all have their own plans for reform. Absent from the fray, however -- until now -- has been the Supreme Court, which has never issued a decision interpreting Section 230. That appears poised to change, however, following Justice Thomas's statement in Malwarebytes v. Enigma in which he urges the Court to prune back decades of lower-court precedent to craft a more limited immunity doctrine. This Essay discusses how courts' zealous enforcement of the early internet's free-information ethos gave birth to an expansive immunity doctrine, warns of potential pitfalls to reform, and explores what a narrower, text-focused doctrine might mean for the tech industry.

Related papers

• Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons [74.68176012363253]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems are built on massive swathes of public web data. We conduct the first, large-scale, longitudinal audit of the consent protocols for the web domains underlying AI training corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T16:50:18Z)
• Google Topics as a way out of the cookie dilemma? [0.9217021281095907]
  The paper discusses the legal requirements and implications of the processing of information and personal data for advertising purposes. It emphasises that obtaining explicit consent of individuals is necessary for setting cookies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T11:28:29Z)
• Why Should This Article Be Deleted? Transparent Stance Detection in Multilingual Wikipedia Editor Discussions [47.944081120226905]
  We construct a novel dataset of Wikipedia editor discussions along with their reasoning in three languages. The dataset contains the stances of the editors (keep, delete, merge, comment), along with the stated reason, and a content moderation policy, for each edit decision. We demonstrate that stance and corresponding reason (policy) can be predicted jointly with a high degree of accuracy, adding transparency to the decision-making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T15:11:02Z)
• An Interpretive Framework for Narrower Immunity Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act [0.0]
  Almost all courts to interpret Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act have construed its ambiguously worded immunity provision broadly. This analysis examines the text and history of Section 230 in light of two strains of pre-Internet vicarious liability defamation doctrine. It concludes that the immunity provision of Section 230, though broad, was not intended to abrogate entirely traditional common law notions of vicarious liability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T14:10:07Z)
• Rebooting Internet Immunity [0.0]
  Article proposes refining online immunity by limiting it to claims that threaten to impose a content-moderation burden on internet defendants. Internet also operates as a platform for the delivery of real-world goods and services. This approach empowers courts to identify culpable actors in the virtual world and treat like conduct alike wherever it occurs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:47:47Z)
• Big Tech's Tightening Grip on Internet Speech [0.0]
  Control over online speech lies in the hands of a select few. Platforms have their own interests at stake. With control over online speech so centralized, online outcasts are left with few avenues for expression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:47:12Z)
• No Easy Way Out: the Effectiveness of Deplatforming an Extremist Forum to Suppress Hate and Harassment [4.8185026703701705]
  We show that deplatforming an active community to suppress online hate and harassment can be hard. Case study is the disruption of the largest and longest-running harassment forum Kiwi Farms in late 2022.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T10:14:16Z)
• Web3: The Next Internet Revolution [50.16560061003771]
  Next internet revolution: Web3 is going to open new opportunities for traditional social models. Decentralized finance will be global, and open with financial inclusiveness for unbanked people. Several worthwhile future research directions of Web3 are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T23:37:43Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)
• HoaxItaly: a collection of Italian disinformation and fact-checking stories shared on Twitter in 2019 [72.96986027203377]
  The dataset includes also title and body for approximately 37k news articles. It is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.79DVN/ PGVDHX.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-29T16:14:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.