Learnersourcing in the Age of AI: Student, Educator and Machine Partnerships for Content Creation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06386v1
• Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:17:45 GMT
• Title: Learnersourcing in the Age of AI: Student, Educator and Machine Partnerships for Content Creation
• Authors: Hassan Khosravi and Paul Denny and Steven Moore and John Stamper
• Abstract summary: Engaging students in creating novel content, also referred to as learnersourcing, is increasingly recognised as an effective approach to promoting higher-order learning. This paper presents a framework that considers the existing learnersourcing literature, the latest insights from the learning sciences and advances in AI to offer promising future directions for developing learnersourcing systems.
• Score: 2.8074364079901013
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Engaging students in creating novel content, also referred to as learnersourcing, is increasingly recognised as an effective approach to promoting higher-order learning, deeply engaging students with course material and developing large repositories of content suitable for personalized learning. Despite these benefits, some common concerns and criticisms are associated with learnersourcing (e.g., the quality of resources created by students, challenges in incentivising engagement and lack of availability of reliable learnersourcing systems), which have limited its adoption. This paper presents a framework that considers the existing learnersourcing literature, the latest insights from the learning sciences and advances in AI to offer promising future directions for developing learnersourcing systems. The framework is designed around important questions and human-AI partnerships relating to four key aspects: (1) creating novel content, (2) evaluating the quality of the created content, (3) utilising learnersourced contributions of students and (4) enabling instructors to support students in the learnersourcing process. We then present two comprehensive case studies that illustrate the application of the proposed framework in relation to two existing popular learnersourcing systems.

Related papers

• Development of an open education resources (OER) system: a comparative analysis and implementation approach [0.0]
  The project includes a comparative analysis of the top five open-source Learning Management Systems (LMS) The primary objective is to create a web-based system that facilitates the sharing of educational resources for non-commercial users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:58:45Z)
• Representing Pedagogic Content Knowledge Through Rough Sets [0.0]
  The paper is meant for rough set researchers intending to build logical models or develop meaning-aware AI-software to aid teachers. The main advantage of the proposed approach is in its ability to coherently handle vagueness, multi-modality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T11:00:45Z)
• Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models as Knowledge Generators [78.63553017938911]
  Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks. However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge. We introduce CONNER, designed to evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T08:22:37Z)
• Exploring Iterative Enhancement for Improving Learnersourced Multiple-Choice Question Explanations with Large Language Models [23.12128710240935]
  We present and evaluate a framework called "ILearner-LLM" to scaffold the task of automated explanation generation. The framework generates high-quality student-aligned explanations by iteratively feeding the quality rating score from the evaluation model back into the instruction prompt. Our findings represent a promising path to enrich the learnersourcing experience for students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T09:04:15Z)
• Can We Trust AI-Generated Educational Content? Comparative Analysis of Human and AI-Generated Learning Resources [4.528957284486784]
  Large language models (LLMs) appear to offer a promising solution to the rapid creation of learning materials at scale. We compare the quality of resources generated by an LLM with those created by students as part of a learnersourcing activity. Our results show that the quality of AI-generated resources, as perceived by students, is equivalent to the quality of resources generated by their peers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:49:21Z)
• Multimodal Dialog Systems with Dual Knowledge-enhanced Generative Pretrained Language Model [63.461030694700014]
  We propose a novel dual knowledge-enhanced generative pretrained language model for multimodal task-oriented dialog systems (DKMD) The proposed DKMD consists of three key components: dual knowledge selection, dual knowledge-enhanced context learning, and knowledge-enhanced response generation. Experiments on a public dataset verify the superiority of the proposed DKMD over state-of-the-art competitors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-16T13:02:54Z)
• Contextualized Knowledge-aware Attentive Neural Network: Enhancing Answer Selection with Knowledge [77.77684299758494]
  We extensively investigate approaches to enhancing the answer selection model with external knowledge from knowledge graph (KG) First, we present a context-knowledge interaction learning framework, Knowledge-aware Neural Network (KNN), which learns the QA sentence representations by considering a tight interaction with the external knowledge from KG and the textual information. To handle the diversity and complexity of KG information, we propose a Contextualized Knowledge-aware Attentive Neural Network (CKANN), which improves the knowledge representation learning with structure information via a customized Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) and comprehensively learns context-based and knowledge-based sentence representation via
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T05:52:20Z)
• Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
  The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education. A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum. The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)
• Dual Policy Distillation [58.43610940026261]
  Policy distillation, which transfers a teacher policy to a student policy, has achieved great success in challenging tasks of deep reinforcement learning. In this work, we introduce dual policy distillation(DPD), a student-student framework in which two learners operate on the same environment to explore different perspectives of the environment. The key challenge in developing this dual learning framework is to identify the beneficial knowledge from the peer learner for contemporary learning-based reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T06:49:47Z)
• Knowledge Integration of Collaborative Product Design Using Cloud Computing Infrastructure [65.2157099438235]
  The main focus of this paper is the concept of ongoing research in providing the knowledge integration service for collaborative product design and development using cloud computing infrastructure. Proposed knowledge integration services support users by giving real-time access to knowledge resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-16T18:44:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.