Related papers: The Devil is in the Details: Analyzing the Lucrative Ad Fraud Patterns of the Online Ad Ecosystem

The Devil is in the Details: Analyzing the Lucrative Ad Fraud Patterns of the Online Ad Ecosystem

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08418v1
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:28:07 GMT
Title: The Devil is in the Details: Analyzing the Lucrative Ad Fraud Patterns of the Online Ad Ecosystem
Authors: Emmanouil Papadogiannakis, Nicolas Kourtellis, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Evangelos P. Markatos
Abstract summary: We study over 7 million websites and examine how state-of-the-art standards associated with online advertising are applied. We discover and present actual practices observed in the wild and show that publishers are able to monetize objectionable and illegal content.
Score: 3.936965297430477
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: The online advertising market has recently reached the 500 billion dollar mark, and to accommodate the need to match a user with the highest bidder at a fraction of a second, it has moved towards a complex automated model involving numerous agents and middle men. Stimulated by potential revenue and the lack of transparency, bad actors have found ways to abuse it, circumvent restrictions, and generate substantial revenue from objectionable and even illegal content. To make matters worse, they often receive advertisements from respectable companies which have nothing to do with these illegal activities. Altogether, advertiser money is funneled towards unknown entities, supporting their objectionable operations and maintaining their existence. In this project, we work towards understanding the extent of the problem and shed light on how shady agents take advantage of gaps in the ad ecosystem to monetize their operations. We study over 7 million websites and examine how state-of-the-art standards associated with online advertising are applied. We discover and present actual practices observed in the wild and show that publishers are able to monetize objectionable and illegal content and generate thousands of dollars of revenue on a monthly basis.

Related papers

The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [53.83179030955546]
We find that Telegram is a perfect breeding ground for a complex ecosystem of conspiracy channels. Conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. We uncover the "Conspiracy Money Machine," revealing how most conspiracy channels actively seek to profit from their subscribers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
Long-Term Ad Memorability: Understanding & Generating Memorable Ads [54.23854539909078]
There has been no large-scale study on the memorability of ads. We release the first memorability dataset, LAMBDA, consisting of 1749 participants and 2205 ads covering 276 brands.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T10:27:04Z)
Targeted and Troublesome: Tracking and Advertising on Children's Websites [10.066090482189015]
We measure the prevalence of trackers, fingerprinting scripts, and advertisements on child-directed websites. Our results show that around 90% of child-directed websites embed one or more trackers, and about 27% contain targeted advertisements. Next, we identify improper ads on child-directed websites by developing an ML pipeline that processes both images and text extracted from ads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-09T11:37:39Z)
Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
Problematic Advertising and its Disparate Exposure on Facebook [15.667983888666312]
We study Facebook and investigate key gaps in our understanding of problematic online advertising. We find that older people and minority groups are especially likely to be shown such ads. Given that 22% of problematic ads had no specific targeting from advertisers, we infer that ad delivery algorithms played a significant role in the biased distribution of these ads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T17:23:59Z)
Multilingual Disinformation Detection for Digital Advertising [0.9684919127633844]
We make the first step towards quickly detecting and red-flaging websites that potentially manipulate the public with disinformation. We build a machine learning model based on multilingual text embeddings that first determines whether the page mentions a topic of interest, then estimates the likelihood of the content being malicious. Our system empowers internal teams to proactively blacklist unsafe content, thus protecting the reputation of the advertisement provider.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-04T10:29:20Z)
Who Funds Misinformation? A Systematic Analysis of the Ad-related Profit Routines of Fake News sites [3.936965297430477]
We study more than 2400 popular fake and real news websites and show that well-known legitimate ad networks have a direct advertising relation with more than 40% of these fake news websites. We show that entities who own fake news websites, also own (or operate) other types of websites for entertainment, business, and politics, pointing to the fact that owning a fake news website is part of a broader business operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-10T15:07:33Z)
Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand. Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z)
Online Joint Bid/Daily Budget Optimization of Internet Advertising Campaigns [115.96295568115251]
We study the problem of automating the online joint bid/daily budget optimization of pay-per-click advertising campaigns over multiple channels. For every campaign, we capture the dependency of the number of clicks on the bid and daily budget by Gaussian Processes. We design four algorithms and show that they suffer from a regret that is upper bounded with high probability as O(sqrtT) We present the results of the adoption of our algorithms in a real-world application with a daily average spent of 1,000 Euros for more than one year.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-03T11:07:38Z)
Adversarial Attacks on Linear Contextual Bandits [87.08004581867537]
Malicious agents may have incentives to attack the bandit algorithm to induce it to perform a desired behavior. We show that a malicious agent can force a linear contextual bandit algorithm to pull any desired arm $T - o(T)$ times over a horizon of $T$ steps. We also investigate the case when a malicious agent is interested in affecting the behavior of the bandit algorithm in a single context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T15:04:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.