Effect-Invariant Mechanisms for Policy Generalization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10983v2
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 16:09:11 GMT
- Title: Effect-Invariant Mechanisms for Policy Generalization
- Authors: Sorawit Saengkyongam, Niklas Pfister, Predrag Klasnja, Susan Murphy,
Jonas Peters
- Abstract summary: It has been suggested to exploit invariant conditional distributions to learn models that generalize better to unseen environments.
We introduce a relaxation of full invariance called effect-invariance and prove that it is sufficient, under suitable assumptions, for zero-shot policy generalization.
We present empirical results using simulated data and a mobile health intervention dataset to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
- Score: 3.701112941066256
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Policy learning is an important component of many real-world learning
systems. A major challenge in policy learning is how to adapt efficiently to
unseen environments or tasks. Recently, it has been suggested to exploit
invariant conditional distributions to learn models that generalize better to
unseen environments. However, assuming invariance of entire conditional
distributions (which we call full invariance) may be too strong of an
assumption in practice. In this paper, we introduce a relaxation of full
invariance called effect-invariance (e-invariance for short) and prove that it
is sufficient, under suitable assumptions, for zero-shot policy generalization.
We also discuss an extension that exploits e-invariance when we have a small
sample from the test environment, enabling few-shot policy generalization. Our
work does not assume an underlying causal graph or that the data are generated
by a structural causal model; instead, we develop testing procedures to test
e-invariance directly from data. We present empirical results using simulated
data and a mobile health intervention dataset to demonstrate the effectiveness
of our approach.
Related papers
- Optimal Classification under Performative Distribution Shift [13.508249764979075]
We propose a novel view in which performative effects are modelled as push-forward measures.
We prove the convexity of the performative risk under a new set of assumptions.
We also establish a connection with adversarially robust classification by reformulating the minimization of the performative risk as a min-max variational problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T12:20:13Z) - Conformal Inference for Invariant Risk Minimization [12.049545417799125]
The application of machine learning models can be significantly impeded by the occurrence of distributional shifts.
One way to tackle this problem is to use invariant learning, such as invariant risk minimization (IRM), to acquire an invariant representation.
This paper develops methods for obtaining distribution-free prediction regions to describe uncertainty estimates for invariant representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T03:48:38Z) - Domain-Specific Risk Minimization for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [104.17683265084757]
We first establish a generalization bound that explicitly considers the adaptivity gap.
We propose effective gap estimation methods for guiding the selection of a better hypothesis for the target.
The other method is minimizing the gap directly by adapting model parameters using online target samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-18T06:42:49Z) - Equivariance and Invariance Inductive Bias for Learning from
Insufficient Data [65.42329520528223]
We show why insufficient data renders the model more easily biased to the limited training environments that are usually different from testing.
We propose a class-wise invariant risk minimization (IRM) that efficiently tackles the challenge of missing environmental annotation in conventional IRM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-25T15:26:19Z) - Predicting Out-of-Domain Generalization with Neighborhood Invariance [59.05399533508682]
We propose a measure of a classifier's output invariance in a local transformation neighborhood.
Our measure is simple to calculate, does not depend on the test point's true label, and can be applied even in out-of-domain (OOD) settings.
In experiments on benchmarks in image classification, sentiment analysis, and natural language inference, we demonstrate a strong and robust correlation between our measure and actual OOD generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-05T14:55:16Z) - Counterfactual Invariance to Spurious Correlations: Why and How to Pass
Stress Tests [87.60900567941428]
A spurious correlation' is the dependence of a model on some aspect of the input data that an analyst thinks shouldn't matter.
In machine learning, these have a know-it-when-you-see-it character.
We study stress testing using the tools of causal inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-31T14:39:38Z) - Nonlinear Invariant Risk Minimization: A Causal Approach [5.63479133344366]
We propose a learning paradigm that enables out-of-distribution generalization in the nonlinear setting.
We show identifiability of the data representation up to very simple transformations.
Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that our approach significantly outperforms a variety of baseline methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-24T15:38:41Z) - What causes the test error? Going beyond bias-variance via ANOVA [21.359033212191218]
Modern machine learning methods are often overparametrized, allowing adaptation to the data at a fine level.
Recent work aimed to understand in greater depth why overparametrization is helpful for generalization.
We propose using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to decompose the variance in the test error in a symmetric way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-11T05:21:13Z) - A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptation [82.01909503235385]
A default assumption in many machine learning scenarios is that the training and test samples are drawn from the same probability distribution.
We propose a novel one-step approach that jointly learns the predictive model and the associated weights in one optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-08T11:35:47Z) - Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers.
We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model.
Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.