No Wrong Turns: The Simple Geometry Of Neural Networks Optimization Paths

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11922v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:10:40 GMT
• Title: No Wrong Turns: The Simple Geometry Of Neural Networks Optimization Paths
• Authors: Charles Guille-Escuret, Hiroki Naganuma, Kilian Fatras, Ioannis Mitliagkas
• Abstract summary: First-order optimization algorithms are known to efficiently locate favorable minima in deep neural networks. We focus on the fundamental geometric properties of sampled quantities of optimization on two key paths. Our findings suggest that not only do optimization trajectories never encounter significant obstacles, but they also maintain stable dynamics during the majority of training.
• Score: 12.068608358926317
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding the optimization dynamics of neural networks is necessary for closing the gap between theory and practice. Stochastic first-order optimization algorithms are known to efficiently locate favorable minima in deep neural networks. This efficiency, however, contrasts with the non-convex and seemingly complex structure of neural loss landscapes. In this study, we delve into the fundamental geometric properties of sampled gradients along optimization paths. We focus on two key quantities, which appear in the restricted secant inequality and error bound. Both hold high significance for first-order optimization. Our analysis reveals that these quantities exhibit predictable, consistent behavior throughout training, despite the stochasticity induced by sampling minibatches. Our findings suggest that not only do optimization trajectories never encounter significant obstacles, but they also maintain stable dynamics during the majority of training. These observed properties are sufficiently expressive to theoretically guarantee linear convergence and prescribe learning rate schedules mirroring empirical practices. We conduct our experiments on image classification, semantic segmentation and language modeling across different batch sizes, network architectures, datasets, optimizers, and initialization seeds. We discuss the impact of each factor. Our work provides novel insights into the properties of neural network loss functions, and opens the door to theoretical frameworks more relevant to prevalent practice.

Related papers

• Improving Generalization of Deep Neural Networks by Optimum Shifting [33.092571599896814]
  We propose a novel method called emphoptimum shifting, which changes the parameters of a neural network from a sharp minimum to a flatter one. Our method is based on the observation that when the input and output of a neural network are fixed, the matrix multiplications within the network can be treated as systems of under-determined linear equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T02:31:55Z)
• Outliers with Opposing Signals Have an Outsized Effect on Neural Network Optimization [36.72245290832128]
  We identify a new phenomenon in neural network optimization which arises from the interaction of depth and a heavytailed structure in natural data. In particular, it implies a conceptually new cause for progressive sharpening and the edge of stability. We demonstrate the significant influence of paired groups of outliers in the training data with strong opposing signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T17:43:50Z)
• Globally Optimal Training of Neural Networks with Threshold Activation Functions [63.03759813952481]
  We study weight decay regularized training problems of deep neural networks with threshold activations. We derive a simplified convex optimization formulation when the dataset can be shattered at a certain layer of the network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T18:59:13Z)
• Towards Theoretically Inspired Neural Initialization Optimization [66.04735385415427]
  We propose a differentiable quantity, named GradCosine, with theoretical insights to evaluate the initial state of a neural network. We show that both the training and test performance of a network can be improved by maximizing GradCosine under norm constraint. Generalized from the sample-wise analysis into the real batch setting, NIO is able to automatically look for a better initialization with negligible cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T06:49:16Z)
• How does unlabeled data improve generalization in self-training? A one-hidden-layer theoretical analysis [93.37576644429578]
  This work establishes the first theoretical analysis for the known iterative self-training paradigm. We prove the benefits of unlabeled data in both training convergence and generalization ability. Experiments from shallow neural networks to deep neural networks are also provided to justify the correctness of our established theoretical insights on self-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T02:16:52Z)
• Optimization-Based Separations for Neural Networks [57.875347246373956]
  We show that gradient descent can efficiently learn ball indicator functions using a depth 2 neural network with two layers of sigmoidal activations. This is the first optimization-based separation result where the approximation benefits of the stronger architecture provably manifest in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-04T18:07:47Z)
• Analytically Tractable Inference in Deep Neural Networks [0.0]
  Tractable Approximate Inference (TAGI) algorithm was shown to be a viable and scalable alternative to backpropagation for shallow fully-connected neural networks. We are demonstrating how TAGI matches or exceeds the performance of backpropagation, for training classic deep neural network architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-09T14:51:34Z)
• Learning Neural Network Subspaces [74.44457651546728]
  Recent observations have advanced our understanding of the neural network optimization landscape. With a similar computational cost as training one model, we learn lines, curves, and simplexes of high-accuracy neural networks. With a similar computational cost as training one model, we learn lines, curves, and simplexes of high-accuracy neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T23:26:58Z)
• A Dynamical View on Optimization Algorithms of Overparameterized Neural Networks [23.038631072178735]
  We consider a broad class of optimization algorithms that are commonly used in practice. As a consequence, we can leverage the convergence behavior of neural networks. We believe our approach can also be extended to other optimization algorithms and network theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T17:10:22Z)
• Efficient and Sparse Neural Networks by Pruning Weights in a Multiobjective Learning Approach [0.0]
  We propose a multiobjective perspective on the training of neural networks by treating its prediction accuracy and the network complexity as two individual objective functions. Preliminary numerical results on exemplary convolutional neural networks confirm that large reductions in the complexity of neural networks with neglibile loss of accuracy are possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-31T13:28:03Z)
• Understanding the Effects of Data Parallelism and Sparsity on Neural Network Training [126.49572353148262]
  We study two factors in neural network training: data parallelism and sparsity. Despite their promising benefits, understanding of their effects on neural network training remains elusive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T10:49:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.