Bring Your Own Data! Self-Supervised Evaluation for Large Language
Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13651v2
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:30:45 GMT
- Title: Bring Your Own Data! Self-Supervised Evaluation for Large Language
Models
- Authors: Neel Jain, Khalid Saifullah, Yuxin Wen, John Kirchenbauer, Manli Shu,
Aniruddha Saha, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping and Tom Goldstein
- Abstract summary: We propose a framework for self-supervised evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs)
We demonstrate self-supervised evaluation strategies for measuring closed-book knowledge, toxicity, and long-range context dependence.
We find strong correlations between self-supervised and human-supervised evaluations.
- Score: 52.15056231665816
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: With the rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) and their ubiquitous deployment
in diverse domains, measuring language model behavior on realistic data is
imperative. For example, a company deploying a client-facing chatbot must
ensure that the model will not respond to client requests with profanity.
Current evaluations approach this problem using small, domain-specific datasets
with human-curated labels. These evaluation sets are often sampled from a
narrow and simplified distribution, and data sources can unknowingly be leaked
into the training set which can lead to misleading evaluations. To bypass these
drawbacks, we propose a framework for self-supervised evaluation of LLMs by
analyzing their sensitivity or invariance to transformations on the input text.
Self-supervised evaluation can directly monitor LLM behavior on datasets
collected in the wild or streamed during live model deployment. We demonstrate
self-supervised evaluation strategies for measuring closed-book knowledge,
toxicity, and long-range context dependence, in addition to sensitivity to
grammatical structure and tokenization errors. When comparisons to similar
human-labeled benchmarks are available, we find strong correlations between
self-supervised and human-supervised evaluations. The self-supervised paradigm
complements current evaluation strategies that rely on labeled data.
Related papers
- Beyond the Singular: The Essential Role of Multiple Generations in Effective Benchmark Evaluation and Analysis [10.133537818749291]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant utilities in real-world applications.
Benchmark evaluations are crucial for assessing the capabilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T03:43:33Z) - Towards Understanding the Robustness of LLM-based Evaluations under Perturbations [9.944512689015998]
Large Language Models (LLMs) can serve as automatic evaluators for non-standardized metrics in summarization and dialog-based tasks.
We conduct experiments across multiple prompting strategies to examine how LLMs fare as quality evaluators when compared with human judgments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T13:31:58Z) - Socio-Emotional Response Generation: A Human Evaluation Protocol for LLM-Based Conversational Systems [9.101091541480434]
We propose a neural architecture that includes an intermediate step in planning socio-emotional strategies before response generation.
Our study shows that predicting a sequence of expected strategy labels and using this sequence to generate a response yields better results than a direct end-to-end generation scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-26T08:15:36Z) - Towards More Effective Table-to-Text Generation: Assessing In-Context Learning and Self-Evaluation with Open-Source Models [0.0]
This study explores the effectiveness of various in-context learning strategies in language models (LMs) across benchmark datasets.
We employ a large language model (LLM) self-evaluation approach using chain-of-thought reasoning and assess its correlation with human-aligned metrics like BERTScore.
Our findings highlight the significant impact of examples in improving table-to-text generation and suggest that, while LLM self-evaluation has potential, its current alignment with human judgment could be enhanced.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T09:19:42Z) - A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classification [51.35500308126506]
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a machine learning approach where the data itself provides supervision, eliminating the need for external labels.
We study how classification-based evaluation protocols for SSL correlate and how well they predict downstream performance on different dataset types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T23:17:36Z) - Self-Training with Pseudo-Label Scorer for Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction [54.23208041792073]
Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction (ASQP) aims to predict all quads (aspect term, aspect category, opinion term, sentiment polarity) for a given review.
A key challenge in the ASQP task is the scarcity of labeled data, which limits the performance of existing methods.
We propose a self-training framework with a pseudo-label scorer, wherein a scorer assesses the match between reviews and their pseudo-labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T05:30:21Z) - Self-training Large Language Models through Knowledge Detection [26.831873737733737]
Large language models (LLMs) often necessitate extensive labeled datasets and training compute to achieve impressive performance across downstream tasks.
This paper explores a self-training paradigm, where the LLM autonomously curates its own labels and selectively trains on unknown data samples.
Empirical evaluations demonstrate significant improvements in reducing hallucination in generation across multiple subjects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T07:25:09Z) - Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score.
Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score.
Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z) - FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Sets [69.91340332545094]
We introduce FLASK, a fine-grained evaluation protocol for both human-based and model-based evaluation.
We experimentally observe that the fine-graininess of evaluation is crucial for attaining a holistic view of model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T14:56:35Z) - Stateful Offline Contextual Policy Evaluation and Learning [88.9134799076718]
We study off-policy evaluation and learning from sequential data.
We formalize the relevant causal structure of problems such as dynamic personalized pricing.
We show improved out-of-sample policy performance in this class of relevant problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-19T16:15:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.