Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14565v4
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:53:25 GMT
• Title: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning
• Authors: Fuxiao Liu, Kevin Lin, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Yaser Yacoob, Lijuan Wang,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the first large and diverse visual instruction tuning dataset, named Large-scale Robust Visual (LRV)-Instruction. Our dataset comprises 400k visual instructions generated by GPT4, covering 16 vision-and-language tasks with open-ended instructions and answers. To efficiently measure the hallucination generated by LMMs, we propose GPT4-Assisted Visual Instruction Evaluation (GAVIE), a stable approach to evaluate visual instruction tuning like human experts.
• Score: 92.85265959892115
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite the promising progress in multi-modal tasks, current large multi-modal models (LMMs) are prone to hallucinating inconsistent descriptions with respect to the associated image and human instructions. This paper addresses this issue by introducing the first large and diverse visual instruction tuning dataset, named Large-scale Robust Visual (LRV)-Instruction. Our dataset comprises 400k visual instructions generated by GPT4, covering 16 vision-and-language tasks with open-ended instructions and answers. Unlike existing studies that primarily focus on positive instruction samples, we design LRV-Instruction to include both positive and negative instructions for more robust visual instruction tuning. Our negative instructions are designed at three semantic levels: (i) Nonexistent Object Manipulation, (ii) Existent Object Manipulation and (iii) Knowledge Manipulation. To efficiently measure the hallucination generated by LMMs, we propose GPT4-Assisted Visual Instruction Evaluation (GAVIE), a stable approach to evaluate visual instruction tuning like human experts. GAVIE does not require human-annotated groundtruth answers and can adapt to diverse instruction formats. We conduct comprehensive experiments to investigate the hallucination of LMMs. Our results demonstrate existing LMMs exhibit significant hallucinations when presented with our negative instructions, particularly Existent Object and Knowledge Manipulation instructions. Moreover, we successfully mitigate hallucination by finetuning MiniGPT4 and mPLUG-Owl on LRV-Instruction while improving performance on several public datasets compared to state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, we observed that a balanced ratio of positive and negative instances in the training data leads to a more robust model. Code and data are available at https://github.com/FuxiaoLiu/LRV-Instruction.

Related papers

• MMInstruct: A High-Quality Multi-Modal Instruction Tuning Dataset with Extensive Diversity [80.02202386597138]
  We construct a high-quality, diverse visual instruction tuning dataset MMInstruct, which consists of 973K instructions from 24 domains. Our instruction generation engine enables semi-automatic, low-cost, and multi-domain instruction generation at the cost of manual construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T17:55:22Z)
• Less is More: High-value Data Selection for Visual Instruction Tuning [127.38740043393527]
  We propose a high-value data selection approach TIVE, to eliminate redundancy within the visual instruction data and reduce the training cost. Our approach using only about 15% data can achieve comparable average performance to the full-data fine-tuned model across eight benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T16:47:25Z)
• To See is to Believe: Prompting GPT-4V for Better Visual Instruction Tuning [82.34463739289892]
  We introduce a fine-grained visual instruction dataset, LVIS-Instruct4V, which contains 220K visually aligned and context-aware instructions. By simply replacing the LLaVA-Instruct with our LVIS-Instruct4V, we achieve better results than LLaVA on most challenging LMM benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T18:59:31Z)
• What Makes for Good Visual Instructions? Synthesizing Complex Visual Reasoning Instructions for Visual Instruction Tuning [115.19451843294154]
  Visual instruction tuning is an essential approach to improving the zero-shot generalization capability of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We propose a systematic approach to automatically creating high-quality complex visual reasoning instructions. Our dataset consistently enhances the performance of all the compared MLLMs, e.g., improving the performance of MiniGPT-4 and BLIP-2 on MME-Cognition by 32.6% and 28.8%, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T15:36:12Z)
• LLM4Vis: Explainable Visualization Recommendation using ChatGPT [21.875548217393927]
  We propose a novel ChatGPT-based approach to perform visualization recommendation and return human-like explanations. Our approach involves feature description, demonstration example selection, explanation generation, demonstration example construction, and inference steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T16:51:46Z)
• What Makes for Good Visual Tokenizers for Large Language Models? [26.488269091290597]
  We investigate proper pre-training methods to build good visual tokenizers, making Large Language Models (LLMs) powerful Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We discuss different visual tokenizers pre-trained with dominant methods (i.e., DeiT, CLIP, MAE, DINO) We obtain a new MLLM equipped with a tailored Good Visual Tokenizer (GVT), which exhibits strong visual comprehension capability at multiple scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T16:11:26Z)
• Visual Instruction Tuning [79.70923292053097]
  We present the first attempt to use language-only GPT-4 to generate multimodal language-image instruction-following data. By instruction tuning on such generated data, we introduce LLaVA: Large Language and Vision Assistant. When fine-tuned on Science QA, the synergy of LLaVA and GPT-4 achieves a new state-of-the-art accuracy of 92.53%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T17:59:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.