Predictive Coding beyond Correlations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15479v2
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:43:52 GMT
- Title: Predictive Coding beyond Correlations
- Authors: Tommaso Salvatori, Luca Pinchetti, Amine M'Charrak, Beren Millidge, Thomas Lukasiewicz,
- Abstract summary: We show how one of such algorithms, called predictive coding, is able to perform causal inference tasks.
First, we show how a simple change in the inference process of predictive coding enables to compute interventions without the need to mutilate or redefine a causal graph.
- Score: 59.47245250412873
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recently, there has been extensive research on the capabilities of biologically plausible algorithms. In this work, we show how one of such algorithms, called predictive coding, is able to perform causal inference tasks. First, we show how a simple change in the inference process of predictive coding enables to compute interventions without the need to mutilate or redefine a causal graph. Then, we explore applications in cases where the graph is unknown, and has to be inferred from observational data. Empirically, we show how such findings can be used to improve the performance of predictive coding in image classification tasks, and conclude that such models are able to perform simple end-to-end causal inference tasks.
Related papers
- Predicting Probabilities of Error to Combine Quantization and Early Exiting: QuEE [68.6018458996143]
We propose a more general dynamic network that can combine both quantization and early exit dynamic network: QuEE.
Our algorithm can be seen as a form of soft early exiting or input-dependent compression.
The crucial factor of our approach is accurate prediction of the potential accuracy improvement achievable through further computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T15:25:13Z) - Learning-Augmented Algorithms with Explicit Predictors [67.02156211760415]
Recent advances in algorithmic design show how to utilize predictions obtained by machine learning models from past and present data.
Prior research in this context was focused on a paradigm where the predictor is pre-trained on past data and then used as a black box.
In this work, we unpack the predictor and integrate the learning problem it gives rise for within the algorithmic challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T08:40:21Z) - Leveraging Task Structures for Improved Identifiability in Neural Network Representations [31.863998589693065]
We extend the theory of identifiability in supervised learning by considering the consequences of having access to a distribution of tasks.
We show that linear identifiability is achievable in the general multi-task regression setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-26T17:16:50Z) - New metrics and search algorithms for weighted causal DAGs [7.424262881242935]
We study causal graph discovery via adaptive interventions with node-dependent costs.
We define a new benchmark that captures the worst-case interventional cost for any search algorithm.
We provide adaptive search algorithms that achieve logarithmic approximations under various settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T03:48:37Z) - Neural Algorithmic Reasoning with Causal Regularisation [18.299363749150093]
We make an important observation: there are many different inputs for which an algorithm will perform certain intermediate computations identically.
This insight allows us to develop data augmentation procedures that, given an algorithm's intermediate trajectory, produce inputs for which the target algorithm would have exactly the same next trajectory step.
We prove that the resulting method, which we call Hint-ReLIC, improves the OOD generalisation capabilities of the reasoner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-20T19:41:15Z) - A Meta-Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Causal Discovery [3.4806267677524896]
Causal structures can enable models to go beyond pure correlation-based inference.
Finding causal structures from data poses a significant challenge both in computational effort and accuracy.
We develop a meta-reinforcement learning algorithm that performs causal discovery by learning to perform interventions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-18T09:26:07Z) - Hybrid Predictive Coding: Inferring, Fast and Slow [62.997667081978825]
We propose a hybrid predictive coding network that combines both iterative and amortized inference in a principled manner.
We demonstrate that our model is inherently sensitive to its uncertainty and adaptively balances balances to obtain accurate beliefs using minimum computational expense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-05T12:52:45Z) - Non-Clairvoyant Scheduling with Predictions Revisited [77.86290991564829]
In non-clairvoyant scheduling, the task is to find an online strategy for scheduling jobs with a priori unknown processing requirements.
We revisit this well-studied problem in a recently popular learning-augmented setting that integrates (untrusted) predictions in algorithm design.
We show that these predictions have desired properties, admit a natural error measure as well as algorithms with strong performance guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-21T13:18:11Z) - Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and
Gradient Supervision [57.14468881854616]
We propose an auxiliary training objective that improves the generalization capabilities of neural networks.
We use pairs of minimally-different examples with different labels, a.k.a counterfactual or contrasting examples, which provide a signal indicative of the underlying causal structure of the task.
Models trained with this technique demonstrate improved performance on out-of-distribution test sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T02:47:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.