Next Steps for Human-Centered Generative AI: A Technical Perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15774v2
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:53:02 GMT
- Title: Next Steps for Human-Centered Generative AI: A Technical Perspective
- Authors: Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Jeff Burke, Ruofei Du, Matthew K. Hong, Jennifer
Jacobs, Philippe Laban, Dingzeyu Li, Nanyun Peng, Karl D. D. Willis,
Chien-Sheng Wu, Bolei Zhou
- Abstract summary: We propose next-steps for Human-centered Generative AI (HGAI)
By identifying these next-steps, we intend to draw interdisciplinary research teams to pursue a coherent set of emergent ideas in HGAI.
- Score: 107.74614586614224
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Through iterative, cross-disciplinary discussions, we define and propose
next-steps for Human-centered Generative AI (HGAI). We contribute a
comprehensive research agenda that lays out future directions of Generative AI
spanning three levels: aligning with human values; assimilating human intents;
and augmenting human abilities. By identifying these next-steps, we intend to
draw interdisciplinary research teams to pursue a coherent set of emergent
ideas in HGAI, focusing on their interested topics while maintaining a coherent
big picture of the future work landscape.
Related papers
- Progress: A Post-AI Manifesto [0.0]
This manifesto outlines key principles for progress in the post-AI era.
It emphasizes non-linear yet cumulative advancement, deep understanding of purpose and context, and system-level experimentation.
It acknowledges AI's potential to accelerate progress across industries while recognizing its limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-25T08:59:42Z) - Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment.
The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment.
We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z) - Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution.
Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts.
We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z) - Imagining a Future of Designing with AI: Dynamic Grounding, Constructive
Negotiation, and Sustainable Motivation [13.850610205757633]
We aim to isolate the new value large AI models can provide design compared to past technologies.
We arrive at three affordances that summarize latent qualities of natural language-enabled foundation models.
Our design process, terminology, and diagrams aim to contribute to future discussions about the relative affordances of AI technology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T00:20:43Z) - The illusion of artificial inclusion [5.721091784293226]
Human participants play a central role in the development of modern artificial intelligence technology.
Recent advances in generative AI have attracted growing interest to the possibility of replacing human participants with AI surrogates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T18:58:02Z) - Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Current & Future
Trends [76.94037394832931]
In recent years, the CHI community has seen significant growth in research on Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence.
All of this work is aimed at developing AI that benefits humanity while being grounded in human rights and ethics, and reducing the potential harms of AI.
In this special interest group, we aim to bring together researchers from academia and industry interested in these topics to map current and future research trends.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T08:59:42Z) - On some Foundational Aspects of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence [52.03866242565846]
There is no clear definition of what is meant by Human Centered Artificial Intelligence.
This paper introduces the term HCAI agent to refer to any physical or software computational agent equipped with AI components.
We see the notion of HCAI agent, together with its components and functions, as a way to bridge the technical and non-technical discussions on human-centered AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-29T09:58:59Z) - Human-Centered AI for Data Science: A Systematic Approach [48.71756559152512]
Human-Centered AI (HCAI) refers to the research effort that aims to design and implement AI techniques to support various human tasks.
We illustrate how we approach HCAI using a series of research projects around Data Science (DS) works as a case study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-03T21:47:13Z) - Human-AI Symbiosis: A Survey of Current Approaches [18.252264744963394]
We highlight various aspects of works on the human-AI team such as the flow of complementing, task horizon, model representation, knowledge level, and teaming goal.
We hope that the survey will provide a more clear connection between the works in the human-AI team and guidance to new researchers in this area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-18T02:39:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.