Automatic Design of Semantic Similarity Ensembles Using Grammatical Evolution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00925v8
• Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 10:11:25 GMT
• Title: Automatic Design of Semantic Similarity Ensembles Using Grammatical Evolution
• Authors: Jorge Martinez-Gil,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents an automated strategy based on grammatical evolution for constructing semantic similarity ensembles.<n> Experiments on standard benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms existing ensemble techniques in terms of accuracy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Semantic similarity measures are a key component in natural language processing tasks such as document analysis, requirement matching, and user input interpretation. However, the performance of individual measures varies considerably across datasets. To address this, ensemble approaches that combine multiple measures are often employed. This paper presents an automated strategy based on grammatical evolution for constructing semantic similarity ensembles. The method evolves aggregation functions that maximize correlation with human-labeled similarity scores. Experiments on standard benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms existing ensemble techniques in terms of accuracy. The results confirm the effectiveness of grammatical evolution in designing adaptive and accurate similarity models. The source code that illustrates our approach can be downloaded from https://github.com/jorge-martinez-gil/sesige.

Related papers

• Comateformer: Combined Attention Transformer for Semantic Sentence Matching [11.746010399185437]
  We propose a novel semantic sentence matching model named Combined Attention Network based on Transformer model (Comateformer) In Comateformer model, we design a novel transformer-based quasi-attention mechanism with compositional properties. Our proposed approach builds on the intuition of similarity and dissimilarity (negative affinity) when calculating dual affinity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T06:18:07Z)
• A Top-down Graph-based Tool for Modeling Classical Semantic Maps: A Crosslinguistic Case Study of Supplementary Adverbs [50.982315553104975]
  Semantic map models (SMMs) construct a network-like conceptual space from cross-linguistic instances or forms. Most SMMs are manually built by human experts using bottom-up procedures. We propose a novel graph-based algorithm that automatically generates conceptual spaces and SMMs in a top-down manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T12:06:41Z)
• Evaluating Semantic Variation in Text-to-Image Synthesis: A Causal Perspective [50.261681681643076]
  We propose a novel metric called SemVarEffect and a benchmark named SemVarBench to evaluate the causality between semantic variations in inputs and outputs in text-to-image synthesis. Our work establishes an effective evaluation framework that advances the T2I synthesis community's exploration of human instruction understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T08:45:35Z)
• Relation-aware Ensemble Learning for Knowledge Graph Embedding [68.94900786314666]
  We propose to learn an ensemble by leveraging existing methods in a relation-aware manner. exploring these semantics using relation-aware ensemble leads to a much larger search space than general ensemble methods. We propose a divide-search-combine algorithm RelEns-DSC that searches the relation-wise ensemble weights independently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:40:12Z)
• Semantic similarity prediction is better than other semantic similarity measures [5.176134438571082]
  We argue that when we are only interested in measuring the semantic similarity, it is better to directly predict the similarity using a fine-tuned model for such a task. Using a fine-tuned model for the Semantic Textual Similarity Benchmark tasks (STS-B) from the GLUE benchmark, we define the STSScore approach and show that the resulting similarity is better aligned with our expectations on a robust semantic similarity measure than other approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T08:11:01Z)
• A Comparative Study of Sentence Embedding Models for Assessing Semantic Variation [0.0]
  We compare several recent sentence embedding methods via time-series of semantic similarity between successive sentences and matrices of pairwise sentence similarity for multiple books of literature. We find that most of the sentence embedding methods considered do infer highly correlated patterns of semantic similarity in a given document, but show interesting differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T23:31:10Z)
• Boosting the Performance of Transformer Architectures for Semantic Textual Similarity [0.0]
  We fine-tune transformer architectures for semantic textual similarity on the Semantic Textual Similarity Benchmark. We experiment with BERT, RoBERTa, and DeBERTaV3 cross-encoders by approaching the problem as a binary classification task or a regression task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T14:16:53Z)
• Syntax and Semantics Meet in the "Middle": Probing the Syntax-Semantics Interface of LMs Through Agentivity [68.8204255655161]
  We present the semantic notion of agentivity as a case study for probing such interactions. This suggests LMs may potentially serve as more useful tools for linguistic annotation, theory testing, and discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T16:24:01Z)
• Beyond Contrastive Learning: A Variational Generative Model for Multilingual Retrieval [109.62363167257664]
  We propose a generative model for learning multilingual text embeddings. Our model operates on parallel data in $N$ languages. We evaluate this method on a suite of tasks including semantic similarity, bitext mining, and cross-lingual question retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T02:41:40Z)
• Relational Sentence Embedding for Flexible Semantic Matching [86.21393054423355]
  We present Sentence Embedding (RSE), a new paradigm to discover further the potential of sentence embeddings. RSE is effective and flexible in modeling sentence relations and outperforms a series of state-of-the-art embedding methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T05:25:17Z)
• Comparing in context: Improving cosine similarity measures with a metric tensor [0.0]
  Cosine similarity is a widely used measure of the relatedness of pre-trained word embeddings, trained on a language modeling goal. We propose instead the use of an extended cosine similarity measure to improve performance on that task, with gains in interpretability. We learn contextualized metrics and compare the results with the baseline values obtained using the standard cosine similarity measure, which consistently shows improvement. We also train a contextualized similarity measure for both SimLex-999 and WordSim-353, comparing the results with the corresponding baselines, and using these datasets as independent test sets for the all-context similarity measure learned on
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T18:04:26Z)
• On The Ingredients of an Effective Zero-shot Semantic Parser [95.01623036661468]
  We analyze zero-shot learning by paraphrasing training examples of canonical utterances and programs from a grammar. We propose bridging these gaps using improved grammars, stronger paraphrasers, and efficient learning methods. Our model achieves strong performance on two semantic parsing benchmarks (Scholar, Geo) with zero labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T21:41:16Z)
• Rethinking End-to-End Evaluation of Decomposable Tasks: A Case Study on Spoken Language Understanding [101.24748444126982]
  Decomposable tasks are complex and comprise of a hierarchy of sub-tasks. Existing benchmarks, however, typically hold out examples for only the surface-level sub-task. We propose a framework to construct robust test sets using coordinate ascent over sub-task specific utility functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T02:53:59Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)
• Automated Concatenation of Embeddings for Structured Prediction [75.44925576268052]
  We propose Automated Concatenation of Embeddings (ACE) to automate the process of finding better concatenations of embeddings for structured prediction tasks. We follow strategies in reinforcement learning to optimize the parameters of the controller and compute the reward based on the accuracy of a task model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-10T14:03:20Z)
• Combining Word Embeddings and N-grams for Unsupervised Document Summarization [2.1591018627187286]
  Graph-based extractive document summarization relies on the quality of the sentence similarity graph. We employ off-the-shelf deep embedding features and tf-idf features, and introduce a new text similarity metric. Our approach can outperform the tf-idf based approach and achieve state-of-the-art performance on the DUC04 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T00:22:46Z)
• Leveraging Cognitive Search Patterns to Enhance Automated Natural Language Retrieval Performance [0.0]
  We show that cognitive reformulation patterns that mimic user search behaviour are highlighted. We formalize the application of these patterns by considering a query conceptual representation. A genetic algorithm-based weighting process allows placing emphasis on terms according to their conceptual role-type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T14:13:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.