On the Challenges of Deploying Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data in the Enterprise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04208v1
• Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:42:22 GMT
• Title: On the Challenges of Deploying Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data in the Enterprise
• Abstract summary: We study the challenges associated with deploying synthetic data, a subfield of Generative AI. Our focus centers on enterprise deployment, with an emphasis on privacy concerns caused by the vast amount of personal and highly sensitive data.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI technologies are gaining unprecedented popularity, causing a mix of excitement and apprehension through their remarkable capabilities. In this paper, we study the challenges associated with deploying synthetic data, a subfield of Generative AI. Our focus centers on enterprise deployment, with an emphasis on privacy concerns caused by the vast amount of personal and highly sensitive data. We identify 40+ challenges and systematize them into five main groups -- i) generation, ii) infrastructure & architecture, iii) governance, iv) compliance & regulation, and v) adoption. Additionally, we discuss a strategic and systematic approach that enterprises can employ to effectively address the challenges and achieve their goals by establishing trust in the implemented solutions.

Related papers

• What's the next frontier for Data-centric AI? Data Savvy Agents [71.76058707995398]
  We argue that data-savvy capabilities should be a top priority in the design of agentic systems.<n>We propose four key capabilities to realize this vision: Proactive data acquisition, Sophisticated data processing, Interactive test data synthesis, and Continual adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-02T17:09:29Z)
• Responsible AI Adoption in the Public Sector: A Data-Centric Taxonomy of AI Adoption Challenges [0.0]
  This study develops a taxonomy of data-related challenges to responsible AI adoption in government.<n>Based on a systematic review of 43 studies and 21 expert evaluations, the taxonomy identifies 13 key challenges across technological, organizational, and environmental dimensions.<n> Annotated with institutional pressures, the taxonomy serves as a diagnostic tool to surface'symptoms' of high-risk AI deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:42:09Z)
• Privacy in the Age of AI: A Taxonomy of Data Risks [0.0]
  This paper presents a taxonomy classifying AI privacy risks, synthesised from 45 studies identified through systematic review.<n>We identify 19 key risks grouped under four categories: dataset-Level, Model-Level, Infrastructure-Level, and Insider Threat Risks.<n>Findings reveal a balanced distribution across these dimensions, with human error (9.45%) emerging as the most significant factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T00:20:03Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Generative AI-Empowered Secure Communications in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks: A Survey and Tutorial [107.26005706569498]
  Space-air-ground integrated networks (SAGINs) face unprecedented security challenges due to their inherent characteristics.<n>Generative AI (GAI) is a transformative approach that can safeguard SAGIN security by synthesizing data, understanding semantics, and making autonomous decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T01:42:57Z)
• Policy-Driven AI in Dataspaces: Taxonomy, Explainability, and Pathways for Compliant Innovation [1.6766200616088744]
  This paper provides a comprehensive review of privacy-preserving and policy-aware AI techniques.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy to classify these techniques based on privacy levels, impacts, and compliance complexity.<n>By technical, ethical, and regulatory perspectives, this work lays the groundwork for developing trustworthy, efficient, and compliant AI systems in dataspaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T17:07:01Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Federated Embedding Learning for Localized Retrieval-Augmented Generation [60.81109086640437]
  We propose a novel framework called Federated Retrieval-Augmented Generation (FedE4RAG) FedE4RAG facilitates collaborative training of client-side RAG retrieval models. We apply homomorphic encryption within federated learning to safeguard model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-27T04:26:02Z)
• Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [61.633126163190724]
  Mental illness is a widespread and debilitating condition with substantial societal and personal costs. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold great potential for recognizing and addressing conditions such as depression, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Privacy concerns, including the risk of sensitive data leakage from datasets and trained models, remain a critical barrier to deploying these AI systems in real-world clinical settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z)
• Towards Foundation-model-based Multiagent System to Accelerate AI for Social Impact [37.72844862625008]
  Existing AI4SI research is often labor-intensive and resource-demanding. We propose a novel meta-level multi-agent system designed to accelerate the development of such base-level systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T19:29:34Z)
• Personal Data Protection in AI-Native 6G Systems [3.2688512759172195]
  We examine the primary data protection risks associated with AI-driven 6G networks, focusing on the complex data flows and processing activities. Our findings stress the necessity of embedding privacy-by-design and privacy-by-default principles in the development of 6G standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T10:35:04Z)
• SeCTIS: A Framework to Secure CTI Sharing [13.251593345960265]
  The rise of IT-dependent operations in modern organizations has heightened their vulnerability to cyberattacks. Current information-sharing methods lack privacy safeguards, leaving organizations vulnerable to leaks of both proprietary and confidential data. We design a novel framework called SeCTIS (Secure Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing) to enable businesses to collaborate, preserving the privacy of their CTI data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T08:34:50Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Review of Integration Challenges for Industrial Systems [45.31340537171788]
  Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) generate vast data sets that can be leveraged by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for applications including predictive maintenance and production planning. Despite the demonstrated potential of AI, its widespread adoption in sectors like manufacturing remains limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:54:41Z)
• Generative AI for Secure and Privacy-Preserving Mobile Crowdsensing [74.58071278710896]
  generative AI has attracted much attention from both academic and industrial fields. Secure and privacy-preserving mobile crowdsensing (SPPMCS) has been widely applied in data collection/ acquirement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T04:00:58Z)
• The Privacy Pillar -- A Conceptual Framework for Foundation Model-based Systems [10.261775049562708]
  Foundation models present both significant challenges and incredible opportunities. There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the comprehensive scope of both technical and non-technical issues that the privacy evaluation process should encompass. This paper introduces a novel conceptual framework that integrates various responsible AI patterns from multiple perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T00:44:06Z)
• Federated Learning-Empowered AI-Generated Content in Wireless Networks [58.48381827268331]
  Federated learning (FL) can be leveraged to improve learning efficiency and achieve privacy protection for AIGC. We present FL-based techniques for empowering AIGC, and aim to enable users to generate diverse, personalized, and high-quality content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T04:13:11Z)
• AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes. We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful. We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z)
• Mitigating Sovereign Data Exchange Challenges: A Mapping to Apply Privacy- and Authenticity-Enhancing Technologies [67.34625604583208]
  Authenticity Enhancing Technologies (AETs) and Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs) are considered to engage in Sovereign Data Exchange (SDE) PETs and AETs are technically complex, which impedes their adoption. This study empirically constructs a challenge-oriented technology mapping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T08:16:42Z)
• Requirement Engineering Challenges for AI-intense Systems Development [1.6563993097383285]
  We argue that significant challenges relate to defining and ensuring behaviour and quality attributes of complex, AI-intense systems and applications. We derive four challenge areas from relevant use cases of complex, AI-intense systems and applications related to industry, transportation, and home automation. Solving these challenges will imply process support that integrates new requirements engineering methods into development approaches for complex, AI-intense systems and applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:06:13Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.