Self-Diagnosis and Large Language Models: A New Front for Medical Misinformation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04910v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 21:28:26 GMT
• Title: Self-Diagnosis and Large Language Models: A New Front for Medical Misinformation
• Authors: Francois Barnard, Marlize Van Sittert, Sirisha Rambhatla
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) from the lens of a general user self-diagnosing. We develop a testing methodology which can be used to evaluate responses to open-ended questions mimicking real-world use cases. We reveal that a) these models perform worse than previously known, and b) they exhibit peculiar behaviours, including overconfidence when stating incorrect recommendations.
• Score: 8.738092015092207
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Improving healthcare quality and access remains a critical concern for countries worldwide. Consequently, the rise of large language models (LLMs) has erupted a wealth of discussion around healthcare applications among researchers and consumers alike. While the ability of these models to pass medical exams has been used to argue in favour of their use in medical training and diagnosis, the impact of their inevitable use as a self-diagnostic tool and their role in spreading healthcare misinformation has not been evaluated. In this work, we critically evaluate LLMs' capabilities from the lens of a general user self-diagnosing, as well as the means through which LLMs may aid in the spread of medical misinformation. To accomplish this, we develop a testing methodology which can be used to evaluate responses to open-ended questions mimicking real-world use cases. In doing so, we reveal that a) these models perform worse than previously known, and b) they exhibit peculiar behaviours, including overconfidence when stating incorrect recommendations, which increases the risk of spreading medical misinformation.

Related papers

• MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
  We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions. We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users. Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z)
• The Role of Language Models in Modern Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review [2.048226951354646]
  The application of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has gained significant attention. This review examines the trajectory of language models from their early stages to the current state-of-the-art LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T12:15:15Z)
• MediConfusion: Can you trust your AI radiologist? Probing the reliability of multimodal medical foundation models [20.781551849965357]
  We introduce MediConfusion, a challenging medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmark dataset. We reveal that state-of-the-art models are easily confused by image pairs that are otherwise visually dissimilar and clearly distinct for medical experts. We also extract common patterns of model failure that may help the design of a new generation of more trustworthy and reliable MLLMs in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T18:59:37Z)
• STLLaVA-Med: Self-Training Large Language and Vision Assistant for Medical Question-Answering [58.79671189792399]
  STLLaVA-Med is designed to train a policy model capable of auto-generating medical visual instruction data. We validate the efficacy and data efficiency of STLLaVA-Med across three major medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T15:01:23Z)
• Large Language Model Distilling Medication Recommendation Model [61.89754499292561]
  We harness the powerful semantic comprehension and input-agnostic characteristics of Large Language Models (LLMs) Our research aims to transform existing medication recommendation methodologies using LLMs. To mitigate this, we have developed a feature-level knowledge distillation technique, which transfers the LLM's proficiency to a more compact model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T08:25:22Z)
• MedLM: Exploring Language Models for Medical Question Answering Systems [2.84801080855027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) with their advanced generative capabilities have shown promise in various NLP tasks. This study aims to compare the performance of general and medical-specific distilled LMs for medical Q&A. The findings will provide valuable insights into the suitability of different LMs for specific applications in the medical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T03:37:47Z)
• Medical Foundation Models are Susceptible to Targeted Misinformation Attacks [3.252906830953028]
  Large language models (LLMs) have broad medical knowledge and can reason about medical information across many domains. We demonstrate a concerning vulnerability of LLMs in medicine through targeted manipulation of just 1.1% of the model's weights. We validate our findings in a set of 1,038 incorrect biomedical facts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T06:44:36Z)
• Language models are susceptible to incorrect patient self-diagnosis in medical applications [0.0]
  We present a variety of LLMs with multiple-choice questions from U.S. medical board exams modified to include self-diagnostic reports from patients. Our findings highlight that when a patient proposes incorrect bias-validating information, the diagnostic accuracy of LLMs drop dramatically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T19:56:39Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Privacy-preserving medical image analysis [53.4844489668116]
  We present PriMIA, a software framework designed for privacy-preserving machine learning (PPML) in medical imaging. We show significantly better classification performance of a securely aggregated federated learning model compared to human experts on unseen datasets. We empirically evaluate the framework's security against a gradient-based model inversion attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T13:56:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.