Othering and low status framing of immigrant cuisines in US restaurant reviews and large language models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07645v2
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:52:34 GMT
- Title: Othering and low status framing of immigrant cuisines in US restaurant reviews and large language models
- Authors: Yiwei Luo, Kristina Gligorić, Dan Jurafsky,
- Abstract summary: We find that immigrant cuisines are more likely to be othered using socially constructed frames of authenticity.
Non-European cuisines are more likely to be described as cheap and dirty, even after controlling for price.
- Score: 27.948015645095563
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Identifying implicit attitudes toward food can mitigate social prejudice due to food's salience as a marker of ethnic identity. Stereotypes about food are representational harms that may contribute to racialized discourse and negatively impact economic outcomes for restaurants. Understanding the presence of representational harms in online corpora in particular is important, given the increasing use of large language models (LLMs) for text generation and their tendency to reproduce attitudes in their training data. Through careful linguistic analyses, we evaluate social theories about attitudes toward immigrant cuisine in a large-scale study of framing differences in 2.1M English language Yelp reviews. Controlling for factors such as restaurant price and neighborhood racial diversity, we find that immigrant cuisines are more likely to be othered using socially constructed frames of authenticity (e.g., "authentic," "traditional"), and that non-European cuisines (e.g., Indian, Mexican) in particular are described as more exotic compared to European ones (e.g., French). We also find that non-European cuisines are more likely to be described as cheap and dirty, even after controlling for price, and even among the most expensive restaurants. Finally, we show that reviews generated by LLMs reproduce similar framing tendencies, pointing to the downstream retention of these representational harms. Our results corroborate social theories of gastronomic stereotyping, revealing racialized evaluative processes and linguistic strategies through which they manifest.
Related papers
- When Tom Eats Kimchi: Evaluating Cultural Bias of Multimodal Large Language Models in Cultural Mixture Contexts [15.78054683369659]
We introduce MixCuBe, a cross-cultural bias benchmark, and study elements from five countries and four ethnicities.
Our findings reveal that MLLMs achieve both higher accuracy and lower sensitivity to such perturbations for high-resource cultures.
GPT-4o, the best-performing model overall, shows up to 58% difference in accuracy between the original and perturbed cultural settings in low-resource cultures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T03:50:05Z) - Analyzing Cultural Representations of Emotions in LLMs through Mixed Emotion Survey [2.9213203896291766]
This study focuses on analyzing the cultural representations of emotions in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our methodology is based on the studies of Miyamoto et al. (2010), which identified distinctive emotional indicators in Japanese and American human responses.
We find that models have limited alignment with the evidence in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-04T20:56:05Z) - See It from My Perspective: How Language Affects Cultural Bias in Image Understanding [60.70852566256668]
Vision-language models (VLMs) can respond to queries about images in many languages.
We characterize the Western bias of VLMs in image understanding and investigate the role that language plays in this disparity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T15:49:51Z) - FoodieQA: A Multimodal Dataset for Fine-Grained Understanding of Chinese Food Culture [60.51749998013166]
We introduce FoodieQA, a manually curated, fine-grained image-text dataset capturing the intricate features of food cultures across various regions in China.
We evaluate vision-language Models (VLMs) and large language models (LLMs) on newly collected, unseen food images and corresponding questions.
Our findings highlight that understanding food and its cultural implications remains a challenging and under-explored direction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T17:59:32Z) - COVID-19's Unequal Toll: An assessment of small business impact disparities with respect to ethnorace in metropolitan areas in the US using mobility data [0.0]
This study examines the changes in small urban restaurant visitation patterns following the COVID-19 pandemic.
We investigate differences in visitation pattern changes across Census Block Groups with majority Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, and American Indian populations.
Our results show clear indications of reduced visitation patterns after the pandemic, with slow recoveries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T23:30:20Z) - Does Mapo Tofu Contain Coffee? Probing LLMs for Food-related Cultural Knowledge [47.57055368312541]
We introduce FmLAMA, a multilingual dataset centered on food-related cultural facts and variations in food practices.
We analyze LLMs across various architectures and configurations, evaluating their performance in both monolingual and multilingual settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T08:49:27Z) - Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in
Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs)
LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z) - Building Socio-culturally Inclusive Stereotype Resources with Community
Engagement [9.131536842607069]
We demonstrate a socio-culturally aware expansion of evaluation resources in the Indian societal context, specifically for the harm of stereotyping.
The resultant resource increases the number of stereotypes known for and in the Indian context by over 1000 stereotypes across many unique identities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T01:26:34Z) - Biased Bytes: On the Validity of Estimating Food Consumption from
Digital Traces [17.890674216192277]
We quantify the link between dietary behaviors as captured via social media (Twitter) v.s. a food-tracking application (MyFoodRepo)
We find that the food type distributions in social media v.s. food tracking diverge; e.g., bread is 2.5 times more frequent among consumed and tracked foods than on Twitter, whereas cake is 12 times more frequent on Twitter.
Across food types, food posted on Twitter is perceived as tastier, more caloric, less healthy, less likely to have been consumed at home, more complex, and larger-portioned, compared to consumed and tracked foods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-30T17:13:16Z) - Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias
Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations.
We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity.
Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z) - Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models [107.82654101403264]
Large-scale pretrained language models (LMs) can be potentially dangerous in manifesting undesirable representational biases.
We propose steps towards mitigating social biases during text generation.
Our empirical results and human evaluation demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating bias while retaining crucial contextual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-24T17:52:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.