Credit Assignment: Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Human-like AI Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08171v1
• Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:11:26 GMT
• Title: Credit Assignment: Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Human-like AI Agents
• Authors: Thuy Ngoc Nguyen and Chase McDonald and Cleotilde Gonzalez
• Abstract summary: Temporal credit assignment is crucial for learning and skill development in natural and artificial intelligence. We use a cognitive model based on a theory of decisions from experience to test different credit assignment mechanisms in a goal-seeking navigation task. We found that an IBL model that gives equal credit assignment to all decisions is able to match human performance better than other models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Temporal credit assignment is crucial for learning and skill development in natural and artificial intelligence. While computational methods like the TD approach in reinforcement learning have been proposed, it's unclear if they accurately represent how humans handle feedback delays. Cognitive models intend to represent the mental steps by which humans solve problems and perform a number of tasks, but limited research in cognitive science has addressed the credit assignment problem in humans and cognitive models. Our research uses a cognitive model based on a theory of decisions from experience, Instance-Based Learning Theory (IBLT), to test different credit assignment mechanisms in a goal-seeking navigation task with varying levels of decision complexity. Instance-Based Learning (IBL) models simulate the process of making sequential choices with different credit assignment mechanisms, including a new IBL-TD model that combines the IBL decision mechanism with the TD approach. We found that (1) An IBL model that gives equal credit assignment to all decisions is able to match human performance better than other models, including IBL-TD and Q-learning; (2) IBL-TD and Q-learning models underperform compared to humans initially, but eventually, they outperform humans; (3) humans are influenced by decision complexity, while models are not. Our study provides insights into the challenges of capturing human behavior and the potential opportunities to use these models in future AI systems to support human activities.

Related papers

• Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps? [59.84848399905409]
  We study the ability to skip steps in reasoning. Unlike humans, who may skip steps to enhance efficiency or to reduce cognitive load, models do not possess such motivations. Our work presents the first exploration into human-like step-skipping ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T07:10:24Z)
• On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
  Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks. We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly. In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z)
• Mimicking Human Intuition: Cognitive Belief-Driven Q-Learning [5.960184723807347]
  We propose Cognitive Belief-Driven Q-Learning (CBDQ), which integrates subjective belief modeling into the Q-learning framework. CBDQ enhances decision-making accuracy by endowing agents with human-like learning and reasoning capabilities. We evaluate the proposed method on discrete control benchmark tasks in various complicate environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T16:50:29Z)
• Towards Neural Network based Cognitive Models of Dynamic Decision-Making by Humans [16.72938921687168]
  We build on Instance Based Learning (IBL) that posits that human decisions are based on similar situations encountered in the past. We propose two new attention-based neural network models to have open form non-linear functions to model distinct and heterogeneous human decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T20:28:03Z)
• Predicting and Understanding Human Action Decisions: Insights from Large Language Models and Cognitive Instance-Based Learning [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their capabilities across various tasks. This paper exploits the reasoning and generative capabilities of the LLMs to predict human behavior in two sequential decision-making tasks. We compare the performance of LLMs with a cognitive instance-based learning model, which imitates human experiential decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T14:13:06Z)
• Explain To Decide: A Human-Centric Review on the Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in AI-assisted Decision Making [1.0878040851638]
  Machine learning models are error-prone and cannot be used autonomously. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aids end-user understanding of the model. This paper surveyed the recent empirical studies on XAI's impact on human-AI decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T22:35:21Z)
• Modeling Boundedly Rational Agents with Latent Inference Budgets [56.24971011281947]
  We introduce a latent inference budget model (L-IBM) that models agents' computational constraints explicitly. L-IBMs make it possible to learn agent models using data from diverse populations of suboptimal actors. We show that L-IBMs match or outperform Boltzmann models of decision-making under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T03:55:51Z)
• Can Foundation Models Watch, Talk and Guide You Step by Step to Make a Cake? [62.59699229202307]
  Despite advances in AI, it remains a significant challenge to develop interactive task guidance systems. We created a new multimodal benchmark dataset, Watch, Talk and Guide (WTaG) based on natural interaction between a human user and a human instructor. We leveraged several foundation models to study to what extent these models can be quickly adapted to perceptually enabled task guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T15:13:49Z)
• Anti-Retroactive Interference for Lifelong Learning [65.50683752919089]
  We design a paradigm for lifelong learning based on meta-learning and associative mechanism of the brain. It tackles the problem from two aspects: extracting knowledge and memorizing knowledge. It is theoretically analyzed that the proposed learning paradigm can make the models of different tasks converge to the same optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-27T09:27:36Z)
• Deep Learning Reproducibility and Explainable AI (XAI) [9.13755431537592]
  The nondeterminism of Deep Learning (DL) training algorithms and its influence on the explainability of neural network (NN) models are investigated. To discuss the issue, two convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been trained and their results compared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T12:06:20Z)
• On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models [256.61956234436553]
  We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-16T17:50:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.