Gender mobility in the labor market with skills-based matching models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08368v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:06:21 GMT
- Title: Gender mobility in the labor market with skills-based matching models
- Authors: Ajaya Adhikari, Steven Vethman, Daan Vos, Marc Lenz, Ioana Cocu,
Ioannis Tolios, Cor J. Veenman
- Abstract summary: This work shows the presence of gender segregation in language model-based skills representation of occupations.
We show how skills-based matching approaches can be evaluated and compared on matching performance as well as on the risk of gender segregation.
- Score: 0.06927055673104934
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Skills-based matching promises mobility of workers between different sectors
and occupations in the labor market. In this case, job seekers can look for
jobs they do not yet have experience in, but for which they do have relevant
skills. Currently, there are multiple occupations with a skewed gender
distribution. For skills-based matching, it is unclear if and how a shift in
the gender distribution, which we call gender mobility, between occupations
will be effected. It is expected that the skills-based matching approach will
likely be data-driven, including computational language models and supervised
learning methods.
This work, first, shows the presence of gender segregation in language
model-based skills representation of occupations. Second, we assess the use of
these representations in a potential application based on simulated data, and
show that the gender segregation is propagated by various data-driven
skills-based matching models.These models are based on different language
representations (bag of words, word2vec, and BERT), and distance metrics
(static and machine learning-based). Accordingly, we show how skills-based
matching approaches can be evaluated and compared on matching performance as
well as on the risk of gender segregation. Making the gender segregation bias
of models more explicit can help in generating healthy trust in the use of
these models in practice.
Related papers
- Who Gets the Callback? Generative AI and Gender Bias [0.030693357740321777]
We find that large language models (LLMs) tend to favor men, especially for higher-wage roles.
A comprehensive analysis of linguistic features in job ads reveals strong alignment of model recommendations with traditional gender stereotypes.
Our findings highlight how AI-driven hiring may perpetuate biases in the labor market and have implications for fairness and diversity within firms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-30T07:55:52Z) - Revealing and Reducing Gender Biases in Vision and Language Assistants (VLAs) [82.57490175399693]
We study gender bias in 22 popular image-to-text vision-language assistants (VLAs)
Our results show that VLAs replicate human biases likely present in the data, such as real-world occupational imbalances.
To eliminate the gender bias in these models, we find that finetuning-based debiasing methods achieve the best tradeoff between debiasing and retaining performance on downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T05:59:44Z) - GenderBias-\emph{VL}: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probing [72.0343083866144]
This paper introduces the GenderBias-emphVL benchmark to evaluate occupation-related gender bias in Large Vision-Language Models.
Using our benchmark, we extensively evaluate 15 commonly used open-source LVLMs and state-of-the-art commercial APIs.
Our findings reveal widespread gender biases in existing LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-30T05:55:15Z) - Leveraging Large Language Models to Measure Gender Representation Bias in Gendered Language Corpora [9.959039325564744]
Large language models (LLMs) often inherit and amplify social biases embedded in their training data.<n>Gender bias is the association of specific roles or traits with a particular gender.<n>Gender representation bias is the unequal frequency of references to individuals of different genders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T16:30:58Z) - Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning [87.15170977240643]
We conduct a systematic study of gender biases in model-based evaluation metrics for image captioning tasks.
We demonstrate the negative consequences of using these biased metrics, including the inability to differentiate between biased and unbiased generations.
We present a simple and effective way to mitigate the metric bias without hurting the correlations with human judgments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T04:27:40Z) - Vision-Language Models Performing Zero-Shot Tasks Exhibit Gender-based
Disparities [19.03751960721954]
We explore the extent to which zero-shot vision-language models exhibit gender bias for different vision tasks.
We evaluate different vision-language models with multiple datasets across a set of concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-26T13:44:31Z) - Exploring Gender Bias in Retrieval Models [2.594412743115663]
Mitigating gender bias in information retrieval is important to avoid propagating stereotypes.
We employ a dataset consisting of two components: (1) relevance of a document to a query and (2) "gender" of a document.
We show that pre-trained models for IR do not perform well in zero-shot retrieval tasks when full fine-tuning of a large pre-trained BERT encoder is performed.
We also illustrate that pre-trained models have gender biases that result in retrieved articles tending to be more often male than female.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-02T21:12:05Z) - The Birth of Bias: A case study on the evolution of gender bias in an
English language model [1.6344851071810076]
We use a relatively small language model, using the LSTM architecture trained on an English Wikipedia corpus.
We find that the representation of gender is dynamic and identify different phases during training.
We show that gender information is represented increasingly locally in the input embeddings of the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T00:59:04Z) - DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of
Text-to-Image Generation Models [73.12069620086311]
We investigate the visual reasoning capabilities and social biases of text-to-image models.
First, we measure three visual reasoning skills: object recognition, object counting, and spatial relation understanding.
Second, we assess the gender and skin tone biases by measuring the gender/skin tone distribution of generated images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-08T18:36:52Z) - Gendered Language in Resumes and its Implications for Algorithmic Bias
in Hiring [0.0]
We train a series of models to classify the gender of the applicant.
We investigate whether it is possible to obfuscate gender from resumes.
We find that there is a significant amount of gendered information in resumes even after obfuscation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T14:26:36Z) - How True is GPT-2? An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational
Biases [50.591267188664666]
Downstream applications are at risk of inheriting biases contained in natural language models.
We analyze the occupational biases of a popular generative language model, GPT-2.
For a given job, GPT-2 reflects the societal skew of gender and ethnicity in the US, and in some cases, pulls the distribution towards gender parity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T11:10:27Z) - Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text.
We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions.
Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.