Adversarial Deep Hedging: Learning to Hedge without Price Process Modeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13217v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 03:09:32 GMT
• Title: Adversarial Deep Hedging: Learning to Hedge without Price Process Modeling
• Authors: Masanori Hirano, Kentaro Minami, Kentaro Imajo
• Abstract summary: We propose a new framework called adversarial deep hedging, inspired by adversarial learning. In this framework, a hedger and a generator, which respectively model the underlying asset process and the underlying asset process, are trained in an adversarial manner.
• Score: 4.656182369206814
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep hedging is a deep-learning-based framework for derivative hedging in incomplete markets. The advantage of deep hedging lies in its ability to handle various realistic market conditions, such as market frictions, which are challenging to address within the traditional mathematical finance framework. Since deep hedging relies on market simulation, the underlying asset price process model is crucial. However, existing literature on deep hedging often relies on traditional mathematical finance models, e.g., Brownian motion and stochastic volatility models, and discovering effective underlying asset models for deep hedging learning has been a challenge. In this study, we propose a new framework called adversarial deep hedging, inspired by adversarial learning. In this framework, a hedger and a generator, which respectively model the underlying asset process and the underlying asset process, are trained in an adversarial manner. The proposed method enables to learn a robust hedger without explicitly modeling the underlying asset process. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed method achieves competitive performance to models that assume explicit underlying asset processes across various real market data.

Related papers

• Experimental Analysis of Deep Hedging Using Artificial Market Simulations for Underlying Asset Simulators [0.7329727526222747]
  This study proposes a new approach using artificial market simulations for underlying asset simulations in deep hedging. We investigate the effectiveness of the proposed approach by comparing its results with those of the traditional approach. The results show that the proposed approach can achieve almost the same level of performance as the traditional approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T05:11:07Z)
• Designing an attack-defense game: how to increase robustness of financial transaction models via a competition [69.08339915577206]
  Given the escalating risks of malicious attacks in the finance sector, understanding adversarial strategies and robust defense mechanisms for machine learning models is critical. We aim to investigate the current state and dynamics of adversarial attacks and defenses for neural network models that use sequential financial data as the input. We have designed a competition that allows realistic and detailed investigation of problems in modern financial transaction data. The participants compete directly against each other, so possible attacks and defenses are examined in close-to-real-life conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T12:53:09Z)
• Neural Stochastic Agent-Based Limit Order Book Simulation: A Hybrid Methodology [6.09170287691728]
  Modern financial exchanges use an electronic limit order book (LOB) to store bid and ask orders for a specific financial asset. We propose a novel hybrid LOB simulation paradigm characterised by: (1) representing the aggregation of market events' logic by a neural background trader that is pre-trained on historical LOB data through a neural point model; and (2) embedding the background trader in a multi-agent simulation with other trading agents. We show that the stylised facts remain and we demonstrate order flow impact and financial herding behaviours that are in accordance with empirical observations of real markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T20:53:39Z)
• Factor Investing with a Deep Multi-Factor Model [123.52358449455231]
  We develop a novel deep multi-factor model that adopts industry neutralization and market neutralization modules with clear financial insights. Tests on real-world stock market data demonstrate the effectiveness of our deep multi-factor model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T14:47:11Z)
• Latent State Marginalization as a Low-cost Approach for Improving Exploration [79.12247903178934]
  We propose the adoption of latent variable policies within the MaxEnt framework. We show that latent variable policies naturally emerges under the use of world models with a latent belief state. We experimentally validate our method on continuous control tasks, showing that effective marginalization can lead to better exploration and more robust training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T15:09:12Z)
• Bayesian Bilinear Neural Network for Predicting the Mid-price Dynamics in Limit-Order Book Markets [84.90242084523565]
  Traditional time-series econometric methods often appear incapable of capturing the true complexity of the multi-level interactions driving the price dynamics. By adopting a state-of-the-art second-order optimization algorithm, we train a Bayesian bilinear neural network with temporal attention. By addressing the use of predictive distributions to analyze errors and uncertainties associated with the estimated parameters and model forecasts, we thoroughly compare our Bayesian model with traditional ML alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-07T18:59:54Z)
• Adaptive learning for financial markets mixing model-based and model-free RL for volatility targeting [0.0]
  Model-Free Reinforcement Learning has achieved meaningful results in stable environments but, to this day, it remains problematic in regime changing environments like financial markets. We propose to combine the best of the two techniques by selecting various model-based approaches thanks to Model-Free Deep Reinforcement Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T19:20:22Z)
• Generative Temporal Difference Learning for Infinite-Horizon Prediction [101.59882753763888]
  We introduce the $gamma$-model, a predictive model of environment dynamics with an infinite probabilistic horizon. We discuss how its training reflects an inescapable tradeoff between training-time and testing-time compounding errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T17:54:12Z)
• Hedging using reinforcement learning: Contextual $k$-Armed Bandit versus $Q$-learning [0.22940141855172028]
  We study the construction of replication strategies for contingent claims in the presence of risk and market friction. In this article, the hedging problem is viewed as an instance of a risk-averse contextual $k$-armed bandit problem. We find that the $k$-armed bandit model naturally fits to the Profit and Loss formulation of hedging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T11:34:10Z)
• Plausible Counterfactuals: Auditing Deep Learning Classifiers with Realistic Adversarial Examples [84.8370546614042]
  Black-box nature of Deep Learning models has posed unanswered questions about what they learn from data. Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and multi-objectives are used to furnish a plausible attack to the audited model. Its utility is showcased within a human face classification task, unveiling the enormous potential of the proposed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T11:08:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.