Classifying Causal Structures: Ascertaining when Classical Correlations
are Constrained by Inequalities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02380v1
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:23:55 GMT
- Title: Classifying Causal Structures: Ascertaining when Classical Correlations
are Constrained by Inequalities
- Authors: Shashaank Khanna, Marina Maciel Ansanelli, Matthew F. Pusey, and Elie
Wolfe
- Abstract summary: We develop methods for detecting causal scenarios that impose inequality constraints versus those which do not.
Many scenarios with exclusively equality constraints can be detected via a condition articulated by Henson, Lal and Pusey.
We are able to resolve all but three causal scenarios, providing evidence that the HLP condition is, in fact, exhaustive.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The classical causal relations between a set of variables, some observed and
some latent, can induce both equality constraints (typically conditional
independences) as well as inequality constraints (Instrumental and Bell
inequalities being prototypical examples) on their compatible distribution over
the observed variables. Enumerating a causal structure's implied inequality
constraints is generally far more difficult than enumerating its equalities.
Furthermore, only inequality constraints ever admit violation by quantum
correlations. For both those reasons, it is important to classify causal
scenarios into those which impose inequality constraints versus those which do
not. Here we develop methods for detecting such scenarios by appealing to
d-separation, e-separation, and incompatible supports. Many (perhaps all?)
scenarios with exclusively equality constraints can be detected via a condition
articulated by Henson, Lal and Pusey (HLP). Considering all scenarios with up
to 4 observed variables, which number in the thousands, we are able to resolve
all but three causal scenarios, providing evidence that the HLP condition is,
in fact, exhaustive.
Related papers
- Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective [58.06306331390586]
We analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time.
We show that enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups.
We introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T11:19:52Z) - Tsirelson bounds for quantum correlations with indefinite causal order [4.162019309587634]
We provide a general method for bounding the violation of arbitrary causal inequalities.
We prove that the maximum violation is generally smaller than the algebraic maximum.
Surprisingly, we find that the algebraic maximum of arbitrary causal inequalities can be achieved by a new type of processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T08:07:10Z) - On Regularization and Inference with Label Constraints [62.60903248392479]
We compare two strategies for encoding label constraints in a machine learning pipeline, regularization with constraints and constrained inference.
For regularization, we show that it narrows the generalization gap by precluding models that are inconsistent with the constraints.
For constrained inference, we show that it reduces the population risk by correcting a model's violation, and hence turns the violation into an advantage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-08T03:39:22Z) - Nonclassicality in correlations without causal order [0.0]
Antinomicity is a notion of nonclassicality for correlations in the presence of indefinite causality.
This article provides a causal perspective on antinomicity, complementing the device-independent perspective adopted in arXiv:2411.11397.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T18:04:16Z) - Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown
Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables.
Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z) - Remarks on the use of objective probabilities in Bell-CHSH inequalities [0.0]
We explore the axioms which can be deduced from two widely used objetive probability theories: frequentism and propensities.
One of the strongest objections in the deduction of one version of Bell inequalities goes about the probability space.
It is shown that frequentism rejects the possibility of using counterfactual situations, while long-run propensities allow their use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-16T21:59:52Z) - Nested Counterfactual Identification from Arbitrary Surrogate
Experiments [95.48089725859298]
We study the identification of nested counterfactuals from an arbitrary combination of observations and experiments.
Specifically, we prove the counterfactual unnesting theorem (CUT), which allows one to map arbitrary nested counterfactuals to unnested ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T12:51:04Z) - Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs.
We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables.
We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z) - A Weaker Faithfulness Assumption based on Triple Interactions [89.59955143854556]
We propose a weaker assumption that we call $2$-adjacency faithfulness.
We propose a sound orientation rule for causal discovery that applies under weaker assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-27T13:04:08Z) - Generalizing optimal Bell inequalities [0.0]
Bell inequalities are central tools for studying nonlocal correlations and their applications in quantum information processing.
We develop a method to characterize Bell inequalities under constraints, which may be given by symmetry or other linear conditions.
This allows to search systematically for generalizations of given Bell inequalities to more parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T13:11:02Z) - On the three types of Bell's inequalities [0.0]
I will argue that the violation of Bell's inequalities has different meanings in the three cases.
In the first case it rules out the interpretation of certain numbers as probabilities of events.
In the second case it rules out a common causal explanation of conditional correlations of certain events.
In the third case the violation neither rules out the interpretation of these numbers as probabilities of events nor a common causal explanation of the correlations between these events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T10:11:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.