Large Language Models on the Chessboard: A Study on ChatGPT's Formal
Language Comprehension and Complex Reasoning Skills
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15118v1
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:36:30 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models on the Chessboard: A Study on ChatGPT's Formal
Language Comprehension and Complex Reasoning Skills
- Authors: Mu-Tien Kuo, Chih-Chung Hsueh, Richard Tzong-Han Tsai
- Abstract summary: This paper probes the performance of ChatGPT, a sophisticated language model by OpenAI.
We assess ChatGPT's understanding of the chessboard, adherence to chess rules, and strategic decision-making abilities.
Our study also reveals ChatGPT's propensity for a coherent strategy in its gameplay and a noticeable uptick in decision-making assertiveness.
- Score: 4.138999291282392
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: While large language models have made strides in natural language processing,
their proficiency in complex reasoning tasks requiring formal language
comprehension, such as chess, remains less investigated. This paper probes the
performance of ChatGPT, a sophisticated language model by OpenAI in tackling
such complex reasoning tasks, using chess as a case study. Through robust
metrics examining both the legality and quality of moves, we assess ChatGPT's
understanding of the chessboard, adherence to chess rules, and strategic
decision-making abilities. Our evaluation identifies limitations within
ChatGPT's attention mechanism that affect its formal language comprehension and
uncovers the model's underdeveloped self-regulation abilities. Our study also
reveals ChatGPT's propensity for a coherent strategy in its gameplay and a
noticeable uptick in decision-making assertiveness when the model is presented
with a greater volume of natural language or possesses a more lucid
understanding of the state of the chessboard. These findings contribute to the
growing exploration of language models' abilities beyond natural language
processing, providing valuable information for future research towards models
demonstrating human-like cognitive abilities.
Related papers
- Self Generated Wargame AI: Double Layer Agent Task Planning Based on
Large Language Model [0.6562256987706128]
This paper innovatively applies the large language model to the field of intelligent decision-making.
It proposes a two-layer agent task planning, issues and executes decision commands through the interaction of natural language.
It is found that the intelligent decision-making ability of the large language model is significantly stronger than the commonly used reinforcement learning AI and rule AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-02T09:45:45Z) - ChatABL: Abductive Learning via Natural Language Interaction with
ChatGPT [72.83383437501577]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated significant potential in mathematical abilities.
LLMs currently have difficulty in bridging perception, language understanding and reasoning capabilities.
This paper presents a novel method for integrating LLMs into the abductive learning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-21T16:23:47Z) - Dissociating language and thought in large language models [52.39241645471213]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have come closest among all models to date to mastering human language.
We ground this distinction in human neuroscience, which has shown that formal and functional competence rely on different neural mechanisms.
Although LLMs are surprisingly good at formal competence, their performance on functional competence tasks remains spotty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-16T22:41:19Z) - Improving Chess Commentaries by Combining Language Models with Symbolic
Reasoning Engines [31.87260568733666]
We show how to combine symbolic reasoning engines with controllable language models to generate chess commentaries.
We conduct experiments to demonstrate that our approach generates commentaries preferred by human judges over previous baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-15T23:38:31Z) - Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions.
Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z) - Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse.
It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases.
We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z) - Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning [53.88983683513114]
We propose generating knowledge statements directly from a language model with a generic prompt format.
This approach improves performance of both off-the-shelf and finetuned language models on four commonsense reasoning tasks.
Notably, we find that a model's predictions can improve when using its own generated knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-15T21:58:03Z) - Learning Chess Blindfolded: Evaluating Language Models on State Tracking [69.3794549747725]
We consider the task of language modeling for the game of chess.
Unlike natural language, chess notations describe a simple, constrained, and deterministic domain.
We find that transformer language models can learn to track pieces and predict legal moves with high accuracy when trained solely on move sequences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-26T01:16:23Z) - A Closer Look at Linguistic Knowledge in Masked Language Models: The
Case of Relative Clauses in American English [17.993417004424078]
Transformer-based language models achieve high performance on various tasks, but we still lack understanding of the kind of linguistic knowledge they learn and rely on.
We evaluate three models (BERT, RoBERTa, and ALBERT) testing their grammatical and semantic knowledge by sentence-level probing, diagnostic cases, and masked prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-02T13:25:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.