Benchmarking the Generation of Fact Checking Explanations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15202v1
• Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:40:46 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking the Generation of Fact Checking Explanations
• Authors: Daniel Russo, Serra Sinem Tekiroglu, Marco Guerini
• Abstract summary: We focus on the generation of justifications (textual explanation of why a claim is classified as either true or false) and benchmark it with novel datasets and advanced baselines. Results show that in justification production summarization benefits from the claim information. Although cross-dataset experiments suffer from performance degradation, a unique model trained on a combination of the two datasets is able to retain style information in an efficient manner.
• Score: 19.363672064425504
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Fighting misinformation is a challenging, yet crucial, task. Despite the growing number of experts being involved in manual fact-checking, this activity is time-consuming and cannot keep up with the ever-increasing amount of Fake News produced daily. Hence, automating this process is necessary to help curb misinformation. Thus far, researchers have mainly focused on claim veracity classification. In this paper, instead, we address the generation of justifications (textual explanation of why a claim is classified as either true or false) and benchmark it with novel datasets and advanced baselines. In particular, we focus on summarization approaches over unstructured knowledge (i.e. news articles) and we experiment with several extractive and abstractive strategies. We employed two datasets with different styles and structures, in order to assess the generalizability of our findings. Results show that in justification production summarization benefits from the claim information, and, in particular, that a claim-driven extractive step improves abstractive summarization performances. Finally, we show that although cross-dataset experiments suffer from performance degradation, a unique model trained on a combination of the two datasets is able to retain style information in an efficient manner.

Related papers

• GPT Self-Supervision for a Better Data Annotator [22.598300095822026]
  We propose a Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) self-supervision annotation method. The proposed approach comprises a one-shot tuning phase followed by a generation phase. The alignment score between the recovered and original data serves as a self-supervision navigator to refine the process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T11:33:14Z)
• Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedback [57.816210168909286]
  We leverage recent progress on textual entailment models to address this problem for abstractive summarization systems. We use reinforcement learning with reference-free, textual entailment rewards to optimize for factual consistency. Our results, according to both automatic metrics and human evaluation, show that our method considerably improves the faithfulness, salience, and conciseness of the generated summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T21:04:04Z)
• Modeling Entities as Semantic Points for Visual Information Extraction in the Wild [55.91783742370978]
  We propose an alternative approach to precisely and robustly extract key information from document images. We explicitly model entities as semantic points, i.e., center points of entities are enriched with semantic information describing the attributes and relationships of different entities. The proposed method can achieve significantly enhanced performance on entity labeling and linking, compared with previous state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T08:21:16Z)
• WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipedia [63.234352061821625]
  We propose WiCE, a new fine-grained textual entailment dataset built on natural claim and evidence pairs extracted from Wikipedia. In addition to standard claim-level entailment, WiCE provides entailment judgments over sub-sentence units of the claim. We show that real claims in our dataset involve challenging verification and retrieval problems that existing models fail to address.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:45:32Z)
• Revisiting text decomposition methods for NLI-based factuality scoring of summaries [9.044665059626958]
  We show that fine-grained decomposition is not always a winning strategy for factuality scoring. We also show that small changes to previously proposed entailment-based scoring methods can result in better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T09:54:37Z)
• On Modality Bias Recognition and Reduction [70.69194431713825]
  We study the modality bias problem in the context of multi-modal classification. We propose a plug-and-play loss function method, whereby the feature space for each label is adaptively learned. Our method yields remarkable performance improvements compared with the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T13:47:09Z)
• A Review on Fact Extraction and Verification [19.373340472113703]
  We study the fact checking problem, which aims to identify the veracity of a given claim. We focus on the task of Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) and its accompanied dataset. This task is essential and can be the building block of applications such as fake news detection and medical claim verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T20:05:43Z)
• Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization [117.70510762845338]
  Opinion summarization is the automatic creation of text reflecting subjective information expressed in multiple documents. In this work, we show that even a handful of summaries is sufficient to bootstrap generation of the summary text. Our approach substantially outperforms previous extractive and abstractive methods in automatic and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T15:37:38Z)
• Generating Fact Checking Explanations [52.879658637466605]
  A crucial piece of the puzzle that is still missing is to understand how to automate the most elaborate part of the process. This paper provides the first study of how these explanations can be generated automatically based on available claim context. Our results indicate that optimising both objectives at the same time, rather than training them separately, improves the performance of a fact checking system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T05:23:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.