Statistical Correlators and Tripartite Entanglement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16236v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 18:00:07 GMT
• Title: Statistical Correlators and Tripartite Entanglement
• Authors: Sakil Khan, Dipankar Home, Urbasi Sinha, and Sachin Jain
• Abstract summary: We show that two measures can be empirically determined for the two important classes of tripartite entangled states. Such a formulated scheme would provide for the first time the means to exactly quantify tripartite entanglement.
• Score: 0.07812210699650153
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: It has recently been argued that among the various suggested measures of tripartite entanglement, the two particular measures, viz. the Concurrence Fill and the Genuine Multipartite Concurrence are the only 'genuine' tripartite entanglement measures based on certain suitably specified criteria. In this context, we show that these two genuine tripartite entanglement measures can be empirically determined for the two important classes of tripartite entangled states, viz. the generalized GHZ and the generalized W states using the derived relationships of these two measures with the observable statistical correlators like the Pearson correlator and mutual information. Such a formulated scheme would therefore provide for the first time the means to exactly quantify tripartite entanglement, crucial for the proper assessment of its efficacy as resource. We also point out two specific applications of this scheme, viz. a) Enabling empirical demonstration of the potentially significant feature of inequivalence between Concurrence Fill and Genuine Multipartite Concurrence in quantitatively assessing which of the two given tripartite states is more entangled than the other one. b) Enabling experimental detection of the recently predicted phenomenon of entanglement sudden death for a tripartite system.

Related papers

• Challenges and Considerations in the Evaluation of Bayesian Causal Discovery [49.0053848090947]
  Representing uncertainty in causal discovery is a crucial component for experimental design, and more broadly, for safe and reliable causal decision making. Unlike non-Bayesian causal discovery, which relies on a single estimated causal graph and model parameters for assessment, causal discovery presents challenges due to the nature of its quantity. No consensus on the most suitable metric for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T12:45:23Z)
• Geometry of sequential quantum correlations and robust randomness certification [0.0]
  We study the geometry of quantum correlations and their implications for robust device-independent randomness generation. We identify a boundary for the set of these correlations expressed as a trade-off between the amount of nonlocality between different observers. We propose a practical protocol based on non-projective measurements that can produce the boundary correlations under ideal conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T17:50:29Z)
• Reconciling Predictive and Statistical Parity: A Causal Approach [68.59381759875734]
  We propose a new causal decomposition formula for the fairness measures associated with predictive parity. We show that the notions of statistical and predictive parity are not really mutually exclusive, but complementary and spanning a spectrum of fairness notions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:23:22Z)
• Multipartite entanglement detection based on generalized state-dependent entropic uncertainty relation for multiple measurements [15.907303576427644]
  We present the generalized state-dependent entropic uncertainty relations for multiple measurement settings. We give the experimentally accessible lower bounds on both bipartite and tripartite entanglements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T06:26:07Z)
• Monotonicity and Double Descent in Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Processes [52.92110730286403]
  It is commonly believed that the marginal likelihood should be reminiscent of cross-validation metrics and that both should deteriorate with larger input dimensions. We prove that by tuning hyper parameters, the performance, as measured by the marginal likelihood, improves monotonically with the input dimension. We also prove that cross-validation metrics exhibit qualitatively different behavior that is characteristic of double descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T08:09:33Z)
• Targeted Separation and Convergence with Kernel Discrepancies [61.973643031360254]
  kernel-based discrepancy measures are required to (i) separate a target P from other probability measures or (ii) control weak convergence to P. In this article we derive new sufficient and necessary conditions to ensure (i) and (ii) For MMDs on separable metric spaces, we characterize those kernels that separate Bochner embeddable measures and introduce simple conditions for separating all measures with unbounded kernels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T16:41:16Z)
• Relating an entanglement measure with statistical correlators for two-qudit mixed states using only a pair of complementary observables [0.0]
  We focus on characterizing entanglement of high dimensional bipartite states using various statistical correlators for two-qudit mixed states. relations linking Negativity with the statistical correlators have been derived for such Horodecki states in the domain of distillable entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T02:58:36Z)
• Direct determination of entanglement monotones for arbitrary dimensional bipartite states using statistical correlators and one set of complementary measurements [0.0]
  Entanglement Monotones (EMs) are of key importance, particularly for assessing the efficacy of a given entangled state. There is yet no general scheme available for direct determination of the EMs. The present paper fills this gap, both theoretically as well as experimentally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-01T06:50:40Z)
• Optimal Adaptive Strategies for Sequential Quantum Hypothesis Testing [87.17253904965372]
  We consider sequential hypothesis testing between two quantum states using adaptive and non-adaptive strategies. We show that these errors decrease exponentially with decay rates given by the measured relative entropies between the two states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T00:52:48Z)
• A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methods [60.04142561088524]
  We find that the confidence intervals are rather wide, demonstrating high uncertainty in how reliable automatic metrics truly are. Although many metrics fail to show statistical improvements over ROUGE, two recent works, QAEval and BERTScore, do in some evaluation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T18:28:14Z)
• Entanglement quantification in atomic ensembles [0.0]
  Entanglement measures quantify nonclassical correlations present in a quantum system. We consider broad families of entanglement criteria based on variances of arbitrary operators. We quantify bipartite and multipartite entanglement in spin-squeezed Bose-Einstein condensates of $sim 500$ atoms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-29T16:17:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.