Critical Behavioral Traits Foster Peer Engagement in Online Mental Health Communities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01618v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 14:00:12 GMT
• Title: Critical Behavioral Traits Foster Peer Engagement in Online Mental Health Communities
• Authors: Aseem Srivastava, Tanya Gupta, Alison Cerezo, Sarah Peregrine (Grin) Lord, Md Shad Akhtar, Tanmoy Chakraborty
• Abstract summary: We introduce BeCOPE, a novel behavior encoded Peer counseling dataset comprising over 10,118 posts and 58,279 comments sourced from 21 mental health-specific subreddits. Our analysis indicates the prominence of self-criticism'' as the most prevalent form of criticism expressed by help-seekers, accounting for a significant 43% of interactions. We highlight the pivotal role of well-articulated problem descriptions, showing that superior readability effectively doubles the likelihood of receiving the sought-after support.
• Score: 28.17719749654601
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Online Mental Health Communities (OMHCs), such as Reddit, have witnessed a surge in popularity as go-to platforms for seeking information and support in managing mental health needs. Platforms like Reddit offer immediate interactions with peers, granting users a vital space for seeking mental health assistance. However, the largely unregulated nature of these platforms introduces intricate challenges for both users and society at large. This study explores the factors that drive peer engagement within counseling threads, aiming to enhance our understanding of this critical phenomenon. We introduce BeCOPE, a novel behavior encoded Peer counseling dataset comprising over 10,118 posts and 58,279 comments sourced from 21 mental health-specific subreddits. The dataset is annotated using three major fine-grained behavior labels: (a) intent, (b) criticism, and (c) readability, along with the emotion labels. Our analysis indicates the prominence of ``self-criticism'' as the most prevalent form of criticism expressed by help-seekers, accounting for a significant 43% of interactions. Intriguingly, we observe that individuals who explicitly express their need for help are 18.01% more likely to receive assistance compared to those who present ``surveys'' or engage in ``rants.'' Furthermore, we highlight the pivotal role of well-articulated problem descriptions, showing that superior readability effectively doubles the likelihood of receiving the sought-after support. Our study emphasizes the essential role of OMHCs in offering personalized guidance and unveils behavior-driven engagement patterns.

Related papers

• CBT-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Assisting Cognitive Behavior Therapy [67.23830698947637]
  We propose a new benchmark, CBT-BENCH, for the systematic evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) assistance. We include three levels of tasks in CBT-BENCH: I: Basic CBT knowledge acquisition, with the task of multiple-choice questions; II: Cognitive model understanding, with the tasks of cognitive distortion classification, primary core belief classification, and fine-grained core belief classification; III: Therapeutic response generation, with the task of generating responses to patient speech in CBT therapy sessions. Experimental results indicate that while LLMs perform well in reciting CBT knowledge, they fall short in complex real-world scenarios
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T04:52:57Z)
• PsychoGAT: A Novel Psychological Measurement Paradigm through Interactive Fiction Games with LLM Agents [68.50571379012621]
  Psychological measurement is essential for mental health, self-understanding, and personal development. PsychoGAT (Psychological Game AgenTs) achieves statistically significant excellence in psychometric metrics such as reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:00:30Z)
• Who can help me? Reconstructing users' psychological journeys in depression-related social media interactions [0.13194391758295113]
  We investigate several popular mental health-related Reddit boards about depression. We reconstruct users' psychological/linguistic profiles together with their social interactions. Our approach opens the way to data-informed understandings of psychological coping with mental health issues through social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T14:45:11Z)
• Mental Health Coping Stories on Social Media: A Causal-Inference Study of Papageno Effect [8.962128900404554]
  The Papageno effect concerns how media can play a positive role in preventing and mitigating suicidal ideation and behaviors. We study the impact of exposure to mental health coping stories on individuals on Twitter. Our findings reveal that, engaging with coping stories leads to decreased stress and depression, and improved expressive writing, diversity, and interactivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T10:25:28Z)
• NLP as a Lens for Causal Analysis and Perception Mining to Infer Mental Health on Social Media [10.342474142256842]
  We argue that more consequential and explainable research is required for optimal impact on clinical psychology practice and personalized mental healthcare. Within the scope of Natural Language Processing (NLP), we explore critical areas of inquiry associated with Causal analysis and Perception mining. We advocate for a more explainable approach toward modeling computational psychology problems through the lens of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T09:26:01Z)
• Affective Idiosyncratic Responses to Music [63.969810774018775]
  We develop methods to measure affective responses to music from over 403M listener comments on a Chinese social music platform. We test for musical, lyrical, contextual, demographic, and mental health effects that drive listener affective responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T19:57:46Z)
• Chatbots for Mental Health Support: Exploring the Impact of Emohaa on Reducing Mental Distress in China [50.12173157902495]
  The study included 134 participants, split into three groups: Emohaa (CBT-based), Emohaa (Full) and control. Emohaa is a conversational agent that provides cognitive support through CBT-based exercises and guided conversations. It also emotionally supports users by enabling them to vent their desired emotional problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T08:23:40Z)
• Online discussion forums for monitoring the need for targeted psychological health support: an observational case study of r/COVID19_support [0.9558392439655015]
  The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a severe mental strain on people in general, and on young people in particular. Online support forums offer opportunities for peer-to-peer health support, which can ease pressure on professional and established volunteer services when demand is high. We created and monitored r/COVID19_support, an online forum for people seeking support during the COVID-19 pandemic, on the platform Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T18:58:35Z)
• Exploring Self-Identified Counseling Expertise in Online Support Forums [26.086207762353336]
  We study the differences between interactions with peers and with self-identified mental health professionals. Our work contributes toward the developing efforts of understanding how health experts engage with health information- and support-seekers in social networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T12:53:07Z)
• Assessing the Severity of Health States based on Social Media Posts [62.52087340582502]
  We propose a multiview learning framework that models both the textual content as well as contextual-information to assess the severity of the user's health state. The diverse NLU views demonstrate its effectiveness on both the tasks and as well as on the individual disease to assess a user's health.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T03:45:14Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.