Integral Probability Metrics Meet Neural Networks: The Radon-Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02422v4
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 02:53:39 GMT
• Title: Integral Probability Metrics Meet Neural Networks: The Radon-Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
• Authors: Seunghoon Paik, Michael Celentano, Alden Green, Ryan J. Tibshirani,
• Abstract summary: We study the function of $mathcalF$ to be the unit ball in the RBV space of a given smoothness degree $k geq 0$. This test can be viewed as a generalization of the well-known and classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test to multiple dimensions and higher orders of smoothness.
• Score: 4.81107183727255
• License:
• Abstract: Integral probability metrics (IPMs) constitute a general class of nonparametric two-sample tests that are based on maximizing the mean difference between samples from one distribution $P$ versus another $Q$, over all choices of data transformations $f$ living in some function space $\mathcal{F}$. Inspired by recent work that connects what are known as functions of $\textit{Radon bounded variation}$ (RBV) and neural networks (Parhi and Nowak, 2021, 2023), we study the IPM defined by taking $\mathcal{F}$ to be the unit ball in the RBV space of a given smoothness degree $k \geq 0$. This test, which we refer to as the $\textit{Radon-Kolmogorov-Smirnov}$ (RKS) test, can be viewed as a generalization of the well-known and classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test to multiple dimensions and higher orders of smoothness. It is also intimately connected to neural networks: we prove that the witness in the RKS test -- the function $f$ achieving the maximum mean difference -- is always a ridge spline of degree $k$, i.e., a single neuron in a neural network. We can thus leverage the power of modern neural network optimization toolkits to (approximately) maximize the criterion that underlies the RKS test. We prove that the RKS test has asymptotically full power at distinguishing any distinct pair $P \not= Q$ of distributions, derive its asymptotic null distribution, and carry out experiments to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses of the RKS test versus the more traditional kernel MMD test.

Related papers

• Biology-inspired joint distribution neurons based on Hierarchical Correlation Reconstruction allowing for multidirectional neural networks [0.49728186750345144]
  There are proposed novel artificial neurons based on HCR (Arnold Correlation Reconstruction) allowing to remove low level differences. Such HCR network can also propagate probability distributions (also joint) like $rho(y,z|x)$. It also allows for additional training approaches, like direct $(a_mathbfj)$ estimation, through tensor decomposition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T14:49:27Z)
• Learning with Norm Constrained, Over-parameterized, Two-layer Neural Networks [54.177130905659155]
  Recent studies show that a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) is not a suitable space to model functions by neural networks. In this paper, we study a suitable function space for over- parameterized two-layer neural networks with bounded norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T15:04:07Z)
• Multi-layer random features and the approximation power of neural networks [4.178980693837599]
  We prove that a reproducing kernel Hilbert space contains only functions that can be approximated by the architecture. We show that if eigenvalues of the integral operator of the NNGP decay slower than $k-n-frac23$ where $k$ is an order of an eigenvalue, our theorem guarantees a more succinct neural network approximation than Barron's theorem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T14:57:56Z)
• Collaborative non-parametric two-sample testing [55.98760097296213]
  The goal is to identify nodes where the null hypothesis $p_v = q_v$ should be rejected. We propose the non-parametric collaborative two-sample testing (CTST) framework that efficiently leverages the graph structure. Our methodology integrates elements from f-divergence estimation, Kernel Methods, and Multitask Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T14:43:56Z)
• Neural Inference of Gaussian Processes for Time Series Data of Quasars [72.79083473275742]
  We introduce a new model that enables it to describe quasar spectra completely. We also introduce a new method of inference of Gaussian process parameters, which we call $textitNeural Inference$. The combination of both the CDRW model and Neural Inference significantly outperforms the baseline DRW and MLE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-17T13:01:26Z)
• A Manifold Two-Sample Test Study: Integral Probability Metric with Neural Networks [46.62713126719579]
  Two-sample tests are important areas aiming to determine whether two collections of observations follow the same distribution or not. We propose two-sample tests based on integral probability metric (IPM) for high-dimensional samples supported on a low-dimensional manifold. Our proposed tests are adaptive to low-dimensional geometric structure because their performance crucially depends on the intrinsic dimension instead of the data dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T13:03:31Z)
• Deformed semicircle law and concentration of nonlinear random matrices for ultra-wide neural networks [29.03095282348978]
  We study the limiting spectral distributions of two empirical kernel matrices associated with $f(X)$. We show that random feature regression induced by the empirical kernel achieves the same performance as its limiting kernel regression under the ultra-wide regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T05:25:52Z)
• Fundamental tradeoffs between memorization and robustness in random features and neural tangent regimes [15.76663241036412]
  We prove for a large class of activation functions that, if the model memorizes even a fraction of the training, then its Sobolev-seminorm is lower-bounded. Experiments reveal for the first time, (iv) a multiple-descent phenomenon in the robustness of the min-norm interpolator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T17:52:50Z)
• The Sample Complexity of Robust Covariance Testing [56.98280399449707]
  We are given i.i.d. samples from a distribution of the form $Z = (1-epsilon) X + epsilon B$, where $X$ is a zero-mean and unknown covariance Gaussian $mathcalN(0, Sigma)$. In the absence of contamination, prior work gave a simple tester for this hypothesis testing task that uses $O(d)$ samples. We prove a sample complexity lower bound of $Omega(d2)$ for $epsilon$ an arbitrarily small constant and $gamma
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-31T18:24:41Z)
• Adjusted chi-square test for degree-corrected block models [13.122543280692641]
  We propose a goodness-of-fit test for degree-corrected block models (DCSBM) We show that a simple adjustment allows the statistic to converge in distribution, under null, as long as the harmonic mean of $d_i$ grows to infinity. Our distributional results are nonasymptotic, with explicit constants, providing finite-sample bounds on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance to the target distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T05:20:59Z)
• Learning Over-Parametrized Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networks beyond NTK [58.5766737343951]
  We consider the dynamic of descent for learning a two-layer neural network. We show that an over-parametrized two-layer neural network can provably learn with gradient loss at most ground with Tangent samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T07:09:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.